News
Featured Image
 Shutterstock.com

LONDON, England (LifeSiteNews) — Researchers from Queen Mary University in London (QMUL) have discovered anomalies in COVID-19 vaccine data indicating that the narrative supporting the effectiveness of the jabs is “massively exaggerated” and that the vaccines expose recipients to a risk of “increased mortality.” 

The most likely factor for the erroneous statistics has to do with government authorities misclassifying those who have died within 14 days of a COVID injection as “unvaccinated.” 

Dr. Norman Fenton, a Professor in Risk Information Management at QMUL and a lead author of the study, provided a broad framework of his team’s research in a December 4 radio interview.

“When it comes to the vaccine, ultimately, the only truly objective way to evaluate its overall risk [vs.] benefit is to compare the all-cause mortality for the vaccinated against the unvaccinated,” he stated. 

“So, in crude terms, if the virus is as dangerous as claimed and the vaccine is as effective as claimed, then we should by now have data confirming that the vaccines are saving a lot more lives than they’re killing.”  

Looking closely at the data provided by the United Kingdom’s Office for National Statistics (ONS), which suggested the vaccines were effective, Fenton and his co-author Dr. Martin Neil, “found so many inconsistencies and anomalies in the data that when you take account of the most obvious explanations for these, there really is no reliable evidence that the vaccines reduce all-cause mortality.” 

“In fact, if you take account of the fact that newly vaccinated people [who] die, [are] likely being misclassified as unvaccinated—because that’s the most likely explanation for the strange things in the data—then you get to the conclusion that the vaccines don’t seem to reduce the all-cause mortality, but rather produce a genuine spike in all-cause mortality shortly after vaccination,” he summarized. 

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Ban Critical Race Theory in public schools
  Show Petition Text
9761 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 10000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The dangerous ideas of Critical Race Theory (CRT) are being forced on students in public schools around the country.

This is wrong and parents have had enough! It's time to join them in saying "STOP!" to this harmful and racist propaganda.

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition which says "No to CRT" in public schools, and "Yes to parents' right" to strongly protest CRT.

But, what is CRT anyway and why is it so dangerous?

Critical Race Theory is a hateful system of indoctrination which teaches that one race is either superior or inferior to another race, and that the United States is inherently racist.

CRT is dangerous and hateful precisely because it teaches children who are not white to despise and envy white children simply because of their skin color. And, as a result, it also teaches white children to despise themselves simply because of the color of their skin.

CRT also erroneously teaches that American society is inherently racist, and that different, detrimental policies (like reparations for slavery and race-based pay scales) should be imposed on the population to redistribute wealth from whites to non-whites.

This type of racist/marxist propaganda should have NO place in public, taxpayer-funded schools!

And, thankfully, American parents of EVERY COLOR are raising their voices and ballots against it!

Indeed, parents understand the destructive ramifications of CRT and, despite outrageous threats from Biden's Justice Department to prosecute them, they have been strongly protesting CRT at school board meetings across the country!

And now, in the first test of its kind, a candidate who was campaigning hard against CRT just won the governorship of Virginia in a huge upset victory.

That's great news, but we now need to contact every state legislature about this crucial educational issue.

And, we need to DEMAND that they BAN Critical Race Theory from every public school in their states - both primary and high schools, and colleges!

Whereas advocates of CRT seem more intent on vengence than on teaching children of every race to respect everybody, regardless of skin color, American parents of every race understand that it is not the color of one's skin that matters, but the content of one's character (to paraphrase Martin Luther King, Jr.).

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition asking all state legislatures to BAN Crititical Race Theory from public schools in their respective states.

Thank you!

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

'States are fighting the Left over the morally bankrupt critical race theory' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/states-are-fighting-the-left-over-the-morally-bankrupt-critical-race-theory/

'Parents who oppose Critical Race Theory in schools could be prosecuted by FBI' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/attorney-general-tasks-fbi-to-move-against-parents-protesting-leftist-agenda-in-schools/

Ohio parents testify: Yes, critical race theory is in our schools, and we say NO! - https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/ohio-parents-testify-yes-critical-race-theory-is-in-our-schools-and-we-say-no

An excellent Heritage Foundation document on CRT: Critical Race Theory Would Not Solve Racial Inequality: It Would Deepen It

**Photo Credit: EJ Nickerson / Shutterstock.com

  Hide Petition Text

Dr. Martin Neil, a Professor in Computer Science and Statistics at QMUL and co-author of the study, sent out a series of tweets explaining the data from their paper. 

The figures showed a lower non-COVID-related death rate for the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated indicating that the vaccinated were oddly provided protection, not just from COVID-19, but from all other life-threatening maladies as well. 

And strangely, as Neil reports, the higher mortality rates of the unvaccinated “peak at the same time as the vaccine rollout peaks for [each] age group.” It then “falls and closes in on the vaccinated [rate]. This is not natural.” 

Providing another chart, Neil shows spikes in death rates of the unvaccinated following the uptake of vaccines in the vaccinated, and asks, “Why are the unvaccinated dying after NOT getting the 1st dose? Why are the single dosed dying after NOT getting the 2nd dose?” 


Answering his own questions, he displays another chart from their study demonstrating that there is “plenty of evidence that the vaccinated who die within 14 days of vaccination may be categorized as unvaccinated. Then someone who dies within 14 days of first dose is miscategorized as unvaccinated and a similar thing could occur post second dose.” 

After considering further aspects of the data, Neil concludes that they found “no significant benefit of the vaccines in the short term.” In fact, the shots “appear to expose people to an increased mortality.” 

Furthermore, “[w]hatever the explanations for the observed data, it is clear that the ONS data is both unreliable and misleading. Absent any better explanation Occam’s razor would support our conclusions. The ONS data provide no reliable evidence that the vaccines reduce all-cause mortality.” 

In September, Dr. Joseph Mercola reported that the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in the United States is “counting anyone who died within the first 14 days post-injection as unvaccinated.” 

“Not only does this inaccurately inflate the unvaccinated death toll, but it also hides the real dangers of the COVID shots, as the vast majority of deaths from these shots occur within the first two weeks. Now their deaths are counted as unvaccinated deaths rather than being counted as deaths due to vaccine injury or COVID-19 breakthrough infections,” he wrote. 

Offering further support for the study, Dr. Clare Craig, a co-author and UK Diagnostic Pathologist, tweeted a link to a document issued by Public Health Scotland confirming, in her words, that that one can be “vaccinated for 3 weeks in Scotland before you are ‘vaccinated.’” 

 

When asked if their paper had been peer-reviewed, Fenton said, “No. The funny thing is, when we first started doing research on this, we had no problems getting our work in peer-reviewed papers because we weren’t challenging the narrative.”  

After their work began raising concerns over “mass testing of asymptomatic people, the potential for false positives” and the “inflating [of COVID] case numbers,” their papers were rejected by these publications without review, a difficulty Fenton and his team had not faced before. 

RELATED: 

America is One Step Closer to a National Vaccine Registry! — Only the Senate can stop it now..

 CDC continues dishonest vaccine, COVID data reporting to hide danger of COVID jabs  

 EXCLUSIVE – Former Pfizer VP: ‘Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death.’ 

Brief video illustrates dramatic spikes in COVID-19 deaths after jabs in 40 nations 

 Dr. Peter McCullough: The COVID shot is a form of ‘bioterrorism,’ its spike protein is ‘pathogenic’ 

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

12 Comments

    Loading...