News

LONDON, Aug 20, 2001 (LSN.ca) – Dianne Pretty, a 47-year-old British woman suffering from motor neurone disease, has launched a legal battle to allow her husband to assist her with suicide. Canadian anti-euthanasia activist Alex Schadenberg has criticized the case as another attempt by the Voluntary Euthanasia Society, which has backed the case, “to exploit the disabled to find a poster-child to forward their cause.”

Pretty, with the backing of her husband and adult children, will argue at the High Court that the refusal to allow her husband to assist her with suicide contravenes the Human Rights Act by subjecting her to inhuman and degrading treatment. The BBC reports that Pretty wrote the prime minister earlier this year asking to have the law on voluntary euthanasia changed.

Schadenberg, of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition, told LifeSite, “It is obvious the Mrs. Pretty is in a very difficult condition and there is suffering involved in her case. But if Ms. Pretty is given the right to assisted suicide, it cannot be limited to her alone but would result in assisted suicide for the disabled across the whole nation.” Mr. Schadenberg concluded: ” Our concern is for the vulnerable people whose lives would be taken against their consent, especially since most disabled people are devalued in the eyes of most.” A recent poll, featured in the current issue of The Interim, shows that many Canadians do not respect the lives of disabled people.

See the BBC coverage:  https://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/health/newsid_1499000/1499875.stm

For information on obtaining The Interim:  https://www.lifesitenews.com/interim/subscribe.html

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.