News

By John Jalsevac

NEW YORK, July 31, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Recently the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) voted to give official consultative status to several homosexual rights groups, including one from Quebec that had previously been rejected by the NGO accrediting committee.

On Friday, July 20, the  ECOSOC voted to overturn the decision by the NGO committee, giving official consultative status to the Coalition gaie et lesbienne du Quebec and the Swedish Federation for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Rights in Geneva.

However, while the granting of consultative status to these groups is a severe blow pro-life and pro-family efforts at the UN, what is distressing many pro-family advocates is the fact that the supposedly pro-life and pro-family Bush Administration voted, against the beliefs of its core supporter base, in favor of the pro-homosexual groups.

Austin Ruse, the director of C-Fam, a UN focused pro-family group, responded to the Bush Administration’s decision. “We are distressed that the Bush administration continues to cast these votes for radical homosexuals. The vote is to be condemned,” Ruse told LifeSiteNews.com. Ruse pointed out that this is not the first time that the current administration has chosen to vote in favor of pro-homosexual groups.

In May of 2006, the United States backed the NGO status of two radical pro-homosexual groups, angering much of their supporter base in the process.

“The social conservative base should let the administration know that this is not acceptable,” said Ruse about the most recent case.

Asked why he thought that the Bush Administration would chose to alienate its supporter base in this way, Ruse responded, “There is a large and influential homosexual lobby within the state department.”

Americans for Truth also issued a statement asking, “Why the President would alienate his conservative, pro-family base at this critical juncture. This continues Bush’s misguided policy of recognizing homosexuality-based ‘rights’ organizations at the U.N.”

Americans for Truth also encouraged their supporters to contact the White House and the state department, and to “urge the President to stop using the authority and goodwill of the United States of America to promote the normalization of homosexuality abroad.”

Samantha Singson, also of C-Fam, pointed out in a recent article that the entire process at the UN Economic Social Council was rigged in order to ensure that the homosexual “rights” groups were given the green light. “The voting process was mired in confusion over unclear language,” said Singson. Despite a request for a re-vote, no re-vote was granted, and the motion passed with 22 countries in favor, 13 against, 13 abstaining and 6 absent.

See related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:

  Bush Appointment of Gay Man to Head US AIDS Program Dismays Social Conservatives
  https://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/oct/06101603.html

Quebec Gay Group, Formerly Rejected by UN, Gets Green Light to Lobby UN
https://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/jul/07072304.html

Under New Conservative Government Canada Still Obsessed With Abortion and Homosexuality at UN
https://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/apr/06040512.html

United States Backs UN NGO Status for Homosexual Activist Groups Once Associated with Pedophiles
https://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/may/06051902.html

Three Homosexual Activist Groups Gain Previously Denied UN Consultative Status
https://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/dec/06121404.html

INTERNATIONAL HOMOSEXUAL MOVEMENT AND THE UN
https://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2000/may/00053103.html

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.