News
Featured Image
Canadian Prime Minister Justin TrudeauPhoto by Alex Wong/Getty Images

TORONTO (LifeSiteNews) — The Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) announced yesterday that it will be suing the Canadian federal government over its invocation of the Emergencies Act (EA), due to violations of civil liberties. 

“The government’s emergency declaration is unprecedented and seriously infringes the Charter rights of Canadians,” stated Noa Mendelsohn Aviv, the executive director and general counsel for the CCLA, yesterday during a press conference. 

Aviv and a fellow CCLA member elaborated on the violations of civil liberties that have prompted them to sue the federal government, with Ewa Krajewska of Henein Hutchison LLP as their legal representation. 

She pointed out that the “Charter right to peaceful assembly” is a “critical democratic tool,” which allows “marginalized people to stand up for their rights.” She further noted that a gathering can be both “disruptive” and “peaceful,” and that disruptive protests “can be the most effective way of raising awareness.” 

Abby Deshman, director of the CCLA’s Criminal Justice Program, explained that one of the main reasons why the CCLA is legally challenging the Emergencies Act is because they believe the “threshold” legally required for enactment of the Emergencies Act, “put in place to safeguard our democratic processes,” has “not been met.” 

Along with this lack of legal justification for the EA, “critical protection for the democratic process, rule of law, and the civil liberties of individuals” is absent, said Deshman, going on to cite what the legal threshold for the EA includes. 

“Section three of the Emergencies Act requires that there be a national emergency, a temporary, urgent and critical situation that seriously endangers the lives, health or safety of Canadians, and is of such proportions or nature that it exceeds the capacity or authority of a province to deal with it,” said Deshman. 

“It also encompasses serious situations that seriously threaten the ability of the government of Canada to preserve the sovereignty, security and territorial integrity of the country. In either case, the emergency must be such that it cannot be effectively dealt with under any other Canadian law.

Deshman maintained that it is “unclear” whether any of these requirements have been met, and pointed out that “police deal with extremely complex, difficult law enforcement situations every day” and have already cleared border blockades and dealt with many other protests, “all without emergency powers.”  

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Call on FTC to investigate GoFundMe after shutting down Truckers' page
  Show Petition Text
21255 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 22500!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

GoFundMe has been called on the carpet by Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) for what he described in a letter to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) as possible engagement in potentially unfair or deceptive acts or practices.

After the BigTech crowdfunding giant summarily and seemingly arbitrarily shut down the page for the Canadian Freedom Convoy just as donations reached $10 million, Sen. Cruz sent the letter to FTC Chairwoman Lina Khan asking for the federal agency to investigate.

Please SIGN, SHARE and SUPPORT this petition to the FTC to investigate GoFundMe for potential "unfair or deceptive acts or practices."

One of the main focuses of his letter is fairness.

How can GoFundMe shut down fundraising for an entirely peaceful protest by Canadian Truckers, while, to cite just one example, having allowed the fundraiser for the "Capitol Hill Occupied Protest" in Seattle during the BLM/Antifa riots in the summer of 2020 to continue?

All freedom-loving people should be rightly suspicious that GoFundMe seems to apply one standard to fundraising for liberal causes, and another, far more stringent standard for conservative causes, which can effectively stop conservatives from expressing their support of a cause financially.

If this is true, it is unfair - and, undemocratic - and needs to be stopped immediately. And, that's why GoFundMe must be investigated now!

Please SIGN, SHARE and SUPPORT this petition to the FTC to investigate GoFundMe for potential "unfair or deceptive acts or practices."

GoFundMe says that their terms and conditions were violated because of false claims in the media that the Canadian Freedom Convoy protests had turned violent.

But, this is simply untrue, as there has been absolutely no riotous behavior (this is Canada after all, eh).

Clearly, Ottawa is not Seattle. Ottawa is not Portland.

In fact, the Ottawa police department said that there had been only 7 arrests, for minor violations, among throngs of tens of thousands - and, organizers of the Truckers Freedom Convoy have stated that their people had nothing to do with those arrests.

Please SIGN, SHARE and SUPPORT this petition to the FTC to investigate GoFundMe for potential "unfair or deceptive acts or practices."

While conservatives hate the idea of more government regulation, they hate the idea of losing their right to protest in support of freedom even more.

Smug BigTech companies should not be allowed to kill the momentum of peaceful causes they (or, their peers in Silicon Valley or Washington, DC) don't like.

Simply put, conservative causes on the GoFundMe platform must be held to exactly the same standard as liberal causes. If they are not, then the government must intervene to regulate GoFundMe, or shut them down.

Thank you SIGNING and SHARING this petition to the FTC to investigate GoFundMe for potential "unfair or deceptive acts or practices."

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

'GoFundMe freezes more than 4 million dollars raised for Canadian truckers protesting vax mandates' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/gofundme-freezes-more-than-4-million-dollars-raised-for-canadian-truckers-protesting-vax-mandates/

**Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com

  Hide Petition Text

A further problem of the EA, she said, is that it allows emergency powers to be used “across the entire country,” and “place unprecedented restrictions on every single Canadian’s constitutional rights.” 

“In other words, they apply to everyone,” said Deshman. She added that they could potentially be used to apply to the “thousands of protests” that take place in Canada every year.  

“The order also requires financial institutions to turn over the personal financial details to CSIS and the RCMP, and to freeze the bank accounts and cut off all financial services for people who have attended or provided assistance to those participating in prohibited assembly,” noted Deshman. 

She noted that again, these orders are not limited to trucker convoys, but “limit the rights of every single Canadian, with a particular focus on people who participate in, travel to or assist with [a] protest, no matter where it takes place, no matter the issue.” 

Just this week, it was announced that the former director of communications for Ontario Solicitor General Sylvia Jones, Marion Isabeau-Ringuette, has been fired from her job following the leaking by hackers of details of online donations made to the Canadian truckers Freedom Convoy.

In another attempt to crack down on the Freedom Convoy protesters, the City of Ottawa announced on social media yesterday that protesters may end up having their pets confiscated, a practice which can often lead to an animal being killed. 

Seven Canadian provinces now oppose the invocation of the Emergencies Act by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. 

Debate by Canadian Parliament over Trudeau’s enactment of the Emergencies Act has been postponed to Monday. 

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

7 Comments

    Loading...