News
Featured Image
 Shutterstock

You’re invited! Join LifeSite in celebrating 25 years of pro-life and pro-family reporting at our anniversary Gala August 17th in Naples, Florida. Tickets and sponsorships can be purchased by clicking here. 

WINNIPEG, Manitoba  (LifeSiteNews) – A Canadian doctor was censured by his provincial physicians’ college for prescribing ivermectin, not wearing a mask, and for speaking his mind regarding the COVID vaccines and lockdowns contrary to the official injection narrative.

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Manitoba (CPSM) noted in a June 29 statement that Dr. Wilhelmus Petrus Grobler, who practices family medicine in Winnipeg, could face further discipline from the college for his treatment of two  patients.

According to the CPSM, “In the first case, which occurred between June and September 2021, Dr. Grobler failed to meet the standard of care in his assessment and management of a patient’s medical condition in that he provided treatment for myocarditis in the absence of sufficient evidence to support that diagnosis.”

According to the CPSM, after “Patient X had received their first COVID-19 vaccination, the following day “they reported to a rural emergency room with new onset mild chest pain and tightness, shortness of breath, and general flu-like symptoms.”

Grobler then, said the CPSM, “prescribed ivermectin to the patient when he knew or ought to have known it was neither evidence-informed nor in the patient’s best interest.”

This discipline against Grobler came despite the fact the CPSM “standards on the use of ivermectin” did not come out until September 3, 2021, which is after he prescribed the medication.

The CPSM said the “Committee accepts that to consider the possibility of post-vaccine myocarditis was prudent and that Dr. Grobler did an appropriate physical examination and ordered applicable tests.”

As for the second case, the CPSM claimed that Grobler “allowed one of the patient’s parents to remove their mask during the encounter without a valid reason at a time when mask-wearing was mandated.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Stop Tedros' WHO Pandemic Treaty
  Show Petition Text
99955 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 100000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The WHO Pandemic Treaty looks set to be one of the biggest power-grabs in living memory, with unelected globalists seeking the power to declare pandemics, and then control your country's response. 

But it's not too late to do something about it. 

SIGN and SHARE this special petition telling Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus that the WHO will never usurp your nation's sovereignty.

The past two years have been rife with infringements on personal liberties and civil rights by national governments, but now the World Health Organization is seeking to appropriate those same abusive powers to itself at a global level. 

194 member states representing 99% of the world's population are expected to sign pandemic treaties with the WHO that would allow Tedros, or any future Director General, to dictate exactly how your nation would respond to a new disease outbreak which they consider a pandemic.

This attack on national sovereignty will come as no surprise to those who for years have listened to elites like Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates discussing their vision for the centralization of power into globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), the WHO and the rest of the United Nations. 

SIGN this petition against the WHO's Pandemic Treaty, before it's too late.

Ludicrously, 20 world leaders calling for the treaty, including Tedros, Boris Johnson and Emmanuel Macron, compared the post-Covid world to the post-WWII period, saying similar co-operation is now needed to "dispel the temptations of isolationism and nationalism, and to address the challenges that could only be achieved together in the spirit of solidarity and co-operation - namely peace, prosperity, health and security."

Australian PM Scott Morrison is the latest leader to express support for a “pandemic treaty”.

The stated intention of the WHO is to “kickstart a global process to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.”

The wheels are already in motion, with the Biden administration officially proposing the initial steps towards handing global pandemic control to the WHO. 

Biden's representatives have submitted amendments to the WHO's International Health Regulations (IHR), which would give the Director General the right to declare health emergencies in any nation, even when disputed by the country in question.

These amendments, which would be legally binding under international law, will be voted on by the World Health Assembly (the governing body of the WHO) at a special convention running from May 22-28 and set the stage for a fully-fledged pandemic treaty to be passed. 

SIGN and SHARE the petition telling the WHO that you won't accept any pandemic treaty

The ball has been rolling since the last World Health Assembly meeting in December, where the United States launched negotiations "on a new international health instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response," a U.S. statement read. 

"This momentous step represents our collective responsibility to work together to advance health security and to make the global health system stronger and more responsive. 

"We look forward to broad and deep negotiations using a whole-of-society and whole-of-government approach that will strengthen the international legal framework for public health/pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response and enable us to address issues of equity, accountability, and multisectoral collaboration evident in the COVID-19 pandemic. 

"We know it will take all of us working together across governments, private sector, philanthropy, academia, and civil society to make rapid progress towards a long-term solution for these complex problems," the U.S. statement added.

SIGN the petition today to show the WHO that you won't accept this attack on national sovereignty.

These are precarious times in which freedom and self-determination must be defended from those who would ride rough-shod over your civil rights. 

We do not want to go back to global lockdowns, vaccine mandates and propoganda.

Sign the petition - speak up now!

For More Information:

Biden hands over American sovereignty with proposed WHO treaty - LifeSiteNews

Pandemic Treaty is a backdoor to global governance - LifeSiteNews

Dr. Robert Malone on the WHO's power-grab - LifeSiteNews

**Photo: YouTube Screenshot**

  Hide Petition Text

Additionally, the CPSM’s statement claimed that Grobler gave information during a meeting with the patient’s parents that “conveyed information to the patient and their parents about the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccines that was contrary to Public Health recommendations, professional standards and expectations, and could pose a potential risk to personal and public safety.”

According to the CPSM, during the encounter with the parents, one of them supported the COVID shots and the other did not.

The CPSM said, “During the encounter, Dr. Grobler discussed a list of questions prepared by one parent about the safety of the vaccine in the presence of the child.”

The CPSM claimed that Grobler’s “information was not only contrary to public health recommendations but contributed to the spread of misinformation about the vaccine.”

While Grobler’s medical license has not been revoked, a censure, which is formal means of discipline, can be used to take additional action against the doctor should the CPSM decide to do so in the future.

Grobler was also ordered to pay $6,165.00 for the cost of the CPSM investigation.

LifeSiteNews reached out to Grobler’s office but was told “Dr. Grobler isn’t conducting interviews.”

Doctor was made to sign ‘undertaking’ saying he would not give his own views on jabs 

In October 2020, Grobler was asked to “sign a voluntary undertaking” stating that “he would not disseminate information to his patients or the public regarding COVID-19 that does not align with current public health directives.”

As of now, this undertaking remains in force.

In October 2020, Grobler wrote that the “virus causing COVID-19 is a Cold Virus and causes cold symptoms for the vast majority of people infected between the ages of 0-80.”

“It is not more lethal or carry excess morbidity over any other cold or flu virus, for this age group.”

He then said that it was only a matter of time before all “people” get “the virus and form natural immunity, even if immunized with the mRNA (COVID-19) vaccine which ‘protects’ only for three months, because we are dealing with a NOVEL virus.”

Grobler was also outspoken against the extreme COVID lockdowns in Manitoba, which was one of the first provinces to enact a local vaccine passport system in 2021 that was first put in place in late July 2021.

The rules banned the unvaccinated from accessing sports venues, museums, restaurants, or any other place that mandates proof of a shot to enter.

Just before Christmas, the government put in place rules that restricted church attendance based on the congregation’s COVID vaccine status.

The government of Manitoba until March mandated the COVID vaccine for healthcare workers.

A group of 16 healthcare workers placed on unpaid leave after choosing to not get the COVID jabs in Manitoba are suing their provincial government and local health regions.

Grobler not the only doctor in Canada who has been reprimanded for prescribing Ivermectin

Dr. Daniel Nagase was one of the first in Alberta — and Canada — to openly speak of the benefits of treating COVID with Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, and a regimen of Vitamins C and D.

His testimony of how he treated three people in a rural Alberta hospital with the taboo drugs went viral. Despite the fact all three of his patients made a swift recovery, Nagase nonetheless was banned from practicing medicine in Alberta hospitals.

Several studieshave shown that ivermectin, a widely-used generic drug with virtually no risk of serious side effects, can be effective against COVID-19.

Regulators and drug makers have nevertheless aggressively suppressed the medication, but various leading experts like Dr. Peter McCollough, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, and Dr. Robert Malone, as well as the 12,700 doctors and scientists who signed the Rome Declaration, have endorsed it as a COVID treatment.

Like many drugs, ivermectin has multiple applications, and while one of them is for animals, its use for treating human ailments is well established and was not controversial until the drug was mentioned in the context of COVID-19.

The COVID vaccines have been associated with the inflammatory heart condition myocarditis and the neurologically disabling Guillain Barré Syndrome.

Even the CDC has admitted a “likely association” of “mild” heart inflammation in the young after getting the COVID shots.

The COVID-19 injections approved for emergency use in Canada, and which are still in an experimental trial phase, including the Pfizer vaccine for ages 12 and up, all have connections to cells derived from aborted babies.

Help Jenny Porter recover from her vaccine injury: LifeFunder

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

2 Comments

    Loading...