Featured Image

LifeSiteNews has been permanently banned on YouTube. Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library.

OTTAWA, Ontario, July 27, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – A Canadian government ministry has suggested that social media must be censored in the name of democracy. 

According to Blacklock’s Reporter, Canada’s Heritage Ministry produced a June 16 internal note that stated “lawful but offensive” Twitter content “steals and damages lives,” adding it “intimidates and obscures valuable voices,” which prevents “a truly democratic debate.” 

“This content steals and damages lives,” wrote staff in a briefing note according to Blacklock’s Reporter. “It intimidates and obscures valuable voices, preventing a truly democratic debate.” 

“However, social media platforms can also be used to threaten, intimidate, bully and harass people or used to promote racist, anti-Semitic, Islamophobic, misogynist and homophobic views that target communities, put people’s safety at risk and undermine Canada’s social cohesion or democracy.” 

Blacklock’s Reporter noted that the Heritage Department note did not provide any examples of social media posts being used to “bully” certain groups online. It reported also that the note declared that the Heritage Ministry’s goal is to ensure more “accountability and transparency from online platforms while respecting the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.” 

The briefing note was written only days before Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government presented in a new “hate speech” bill that one pundit cited as an “incredibly dangerous” attack on free speech. 

On June 23, the day before Canada’s House of Commons went into recess for summer, Bill C-36 was introduced by Justice Minister David Lametti. Entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Canadian Human Rights Act and to make related amendments to another Act (hate propaganda, hate crimes and hate speech),” Bill C-36 threatens the ability of social media users to speak freely. If passed, Bill C-36 would theoretically allow a tribunal to judge anyone accused of online “hate” to be in violation of the new law. If found guilty, the individual could face huge fines as well as house arrest.  

Bill C-36 includes text to amend Canada’s Criminal Code and Human Rights Act to include the definition of “hatred” (“haine” in French) as “the emotion that involves detestation or vilification and that is stronger than dislike or disdain.”   

Conservative opinion writer Spencer Fernando gave a scathing review of Bill C-36 on June 24, saying “With Bill C-10, and now Bill C-36, there can be zero doubt that the Trudeau Liberal government is engaged in an attack on your freedom of expression.”  

— Article continues below Petition —
Canada's Health Minister: Make abortion pill reversal information available
  Show Petition Text
2571 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 4000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Many women who choose to undergo a medical abortion procedure (Mifegymiso in Canada) change their minds having taken the first pill.

And now, a safe and effective procedure called abortion pill reversal has been developed to assist these women in an attempt to help them save their pre-born child from the effects of this first pill (Mifepristone).

Abortion advocates are currently engaged in a campaign to silence the message that Alliance for Life Ontario is providing women undergoing a medical abortion in Canada, including even calling facts “mis-information”.

Our message is that there is a safe, effective (64%-68%) method that may save their child if they have second thoughts after starting the Mifegymiso process.

That's why Alliance for Life Ontario and LifeSiteNews are now partnering on this petition: To give Canadian women a second chance at choice!

Abortion Pill Reversal is being offered around the world with 2,000 little ones saved to-date.

But, in Canada, abortion advocates do not want women to have a second chance at choice! Alliance for Life Ontario's Facebook page has been taken down after erroneous complaints, and now their website is being attacked.

Women deserve to know the truth about this second chance at choice and to know there are physicians trained and willing to help them try and save their child, if that is their choice.

We need your help to let the Minister of Health know that Canadian women do not give up their right to the truth when they choose induced abortion.

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition today! Thank you.


Abortion Pill Reversal - A Second Chance:

  Hide Petition Text

According to Fernando, Bill C-36 is “incredibly dangerous, goes against Canada’s values, and must be stopped.”   

“This is the kind of legislation you would expect to see in an anti-democratic, Communist state that is seeking to create wide pretexts to arrest or punish whomever the government feels has ‘stepped out of line’ with the official government message,” opined Fernando.   

Some with Canada’s national police force seem to want the ability to target social media users online.  

A recent Blacklock’s Reporter article says that a specialist with Canada’s national police force, the RCMP, says Bill C-36 if passed would come in handy “as far as our ability to do something about online hate when something needs to be done.” 

Regarding Bill C-36, Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault recently said that “People think that C-10 was controversial. Wait till we table this legislation.”  

Guilbeault’s controversial Bill C-10, or “Act to amend the Broadcasting Act,” has drawn fire for its targeting of user-generated content on social media platform.  

Bill C-10 passed in the early morning hours in Canada’s House of Commons in mid-June, but failed to advance in the Senate on June 29, the last day of debate before the upper chamber closed for the summer.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.