News
Featured Image

July 28, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — As the adverse events count related to COVID-19 vaccines continues to grow around the world, an American medical practitioner has claimed that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had advance notice of some of the possible severe health defects now being reported following use of the jabs, including death, before granting them “emergency use authorization” (EUA) for distribution among the general public.

Bryan Ardis, a chiropractor who has closely followed the trial, development, and public administration of COVID-19 vaccines, spoke with Brannon Howse during his live segment on Lindell TV in a June 11 interview. Ardis explained that the FDA had been presented a document detailing the potential side effects of the proposed anti-COVID jabs for monitoring as early as October 22, 2020, at least two months before the release of the first mRNA gene therapy.

The document, titled “Plans for Monitoring COVID-19 Vaccine Safety and Effectiveness,” was produced by the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), the express aim of which is “to protect and promote the public health, in part by ensuring the safety and efficacy” of vaccines regulated by the FDA.

In conjunction with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the CBER drafted a list of 22 categories of “possible adverse event outcomes” following use of the COVID jabs, including death, and totalling 110 diseases, according to Ardis.

In what was described by Ardis as “the most incredibly damning document I’ve seen this year,” the doctor explained that each of the 22 symptoms listed on slide 16 of the presentation represent several related conditions, emphasizing in particular the inclusion of autoimmune diseases. Though one single bullet-point, the condition accounts for some “eighty diagnosable diseases in America, including fibromyalgia, diabetes, systemic lupus erythematosus.” He noted that the document can be found saved on LifeSiteNews here.

The list also included death as a possible outcome of “vaccine” usage, as well as “pregnancy and birth outcomes,” which Ardis described as “miscarriages, still births,” both of which have been reported extensively. The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), co-run by the FDA and the CDC, shows that from the COVID-19 “vaccines” being rolled out last December until July 16, 2021, at least 2,488 pregnant women have reported an adverse event after taking one of the jabs. Of this number, 850 have reported either miscarriage, fetal abnormalities, premature birth, or some other pregnancy-related injury.

On top of pregnancy-related injuries, the number of blood clotting disorders reported to VAERS now stands at a staggering 7,633, of which 6,000, or 78 percent, followed mRNA jabs. Deaths in the U.S. following use of COVID “vaccines” have reached 5,467, with 20 percent of those occurring within 48 hours of receiving the shot and a further 34 percent in those who took ill within 48 hours of receiving their jab.

Many of the “possible adverse event outcomes” from the jabs listed by the CBER have come to bear, including multiple cases of myocarditis and pericarditis, a dangerous inflammation of the heart. These conditions can also fall under the umbrella symptom detailed in the CBER report named “Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children” (MIS-C). Ardis claimed that the syndrome “never existed” before the introduction of the cautionary document for COVID “vaccines,” but that the Mayo Clinic defines the condition now as “the heart, lungs, blood vessels, kidneys, digestive system, brain, skin or eyes” becoming severely inflamed.

The Mayo Clinic also suggested MIS-C “to be a complication of COVID-19” and that Pfizer’s mRNA shot against the virus may prevent the condition in children 12 years old and above, to whom the jabs are now being offered.

In the U.S., VAERS reporting shows a total of 1,848 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis following COVID jabs, the vast majority of which can be attributed to Pfizer’s mRNA shot. Among that number are 383 reports of 12–17-year-olds suffering heart inflammation. 17 deaths within the younger age group have so far been reported.

These numbers, however, are thought to vastly underrepresent the actual instances of vaccine related injuries. A study into vaccine injury reporting by Harvard Pilgrim Health Care estimated that as few as 1 percent of injuries are reported to VAERS. Vaccine injury activist group Children’s Health Defense acknowledged that doctors “receive little or no training in how to recognize a vaccine adverse reaction, nor are they trained in medical school on how to file a report in VAERS.”

Although the document outlining the potential injuries from the shots is publicly available, the symptoms described within were not made readily known to those who were administered the jabs, and in fact a separate document was drawn up by the FDA some months later for distribution alongside the “vaccines,” according to Ardis, listing headaches, dizziness, fatigue, and chills as possible side effects of the experimental mRNA jabs.

Ardis noted that all of the announced effects one might expect “are very mild, flu like symptoms” and not the life-threatening illnesses described in the document presented to the FDA in October of 2020.

“The disgusting part of this whole thing is that you’ve been lied to and had information withheld from you to be able to make a true, informed consent about getting a vaccine,” Ardis said. “You couldn’t actually know whether or not it was safe for you without knowing all the risks and the benefits.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Fire Fauci and investigate him now!
  Show Petition Text
63600 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 70000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

PETITION UPDATE (5/12/2021)

It seems that Dr. Anthony Fauci's role in the NIH's funding of so-called "gain-of-function" research may be catching up with him.

In the last couple of days, both U.S. Senator Rand Paul and Fox's Tucker Carlson have laid into Fauci for his alleged promotion of this dangerous research which develops bat-based coronaviruses into more potent variants, capable of infecting humans.

Dr. Fauci denied funding this research.

But, Senator Paul noted that a resident virologist at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Dr. Shi Zheng-li and Dr. Ralph Baric, an American virologist funded by Fauci's department in the NIH, "collaborated on gain-of-function research where they enhanced the SARS virus to infect human airway cells and they did it by merging a new spy protein on it. That is gain-of-function. That was joint research between the Wuhan Institute and Dr. Baric. You [Dr. Fauci] can’t deny it."

And, later, Fox News host Tucker Carlson picked up on the discrepancy, noting Fauci’s involvement in the creation and promotion of public health directives on account of COVID-19 while also being allegedly tied to the origin of the virus and its spread throughout the world.

So, the evidence - both in testimony and in the court of public opinion - continues to mount.

Could we ask you to consider SIGNING and SHARING this important petition, which calls for Dr. Fauci to be fired and investigated for any role he played in promoting and funding the dangerous research which may have cost the world dearly in lives and jobs lost.

____________________________________________________

When concerned scientists warned the US government of the great danger of creating superviruses in the lab, one man publicly defended the risky experiments: that man was the influential head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), none other than "Mr. Science" himself: Dr. Anthony Fauci.

In 2014, the same year the US government called for a moratorium on this insanely dangerous research, Dr. Fauci's NIAID began funding a program to study the transmission of bat coronaviruses to humans.

Not only did his funding go to develop the technology for making bat coronaviruses spread more easily to humans, but much of it went to the lab located in the exact location where the Covid pandemic eventually emerged: Wuhan, China.

Like every person, Dr. Fauci deserves to be presumed innocent until proven guilty.

But the evidence is so overwhelming that Fauci gambled with a supervirus and lost (the whole world lost), that, at a minimum, he needs to be fired from his position of public trust and must be investigated for possible violations of US law which mandated a moratorium on this extremely dangerous practice of creating superviruses in the lab.

However Dr. Fauci, far from being held responsible for his dangerous gamble, has been promoted to the point where, currently, he is the highest paid employee in the US Government.

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition if you agree that Dr. Anthony Fauci should instead be immediately fired and investigated for his role in causing the Covid-19 pandemic. 

Just like the Wall Street moguls, whose financial negligence precipitated the financial crisis of 2008, received massive bailout bonuses, Dr. Anthony Fauci recklessly pushed for the research that probably caused the deadly pandemic. And now, he, too, has been rewarded with money and power.

As has been carefully and meticulously documented by Steve Hilton of Fox News, the probable origins of the coronavirus point to Dr. Anthony Fauci.  

Dr. Fauci was one of the greatest proponents of developing superviruses in labs.

Dr. Fauci was responsible for the funding of much of the research through the NIAID.

And, it appears that Dr. Fauci funneled taxpayer funds through an intermediary to allow the research to continue in the unsafe Wuhan Institute of Virology, even after the US government banned the funding of this dangerous research.

Until a thorough investigation into his role of the origins of the current pandemic has taken place, Dr. Fauci should not be in a position of public trust.

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition to demand that Dr. Fauci be fired immediately and investigated fully for his role in the creation of Covid-19 and the ensuing pandemic.

P.S. It should be noted that Dr. Fauci not only has proven to be catastrophic for public health with his advocacy of dangerous research, but he has also been a disastrous public health advisor, advocating measures that have negatively impacted every aspect of our lives, from the economy to our most fundamental liberties.

P.P.S. Dr. Anthony Fauci, recently stated that he is delighted to be pushing Joe Biden's return to US taxpayer funding of abortions abroad. So, evidently, not only does Dr. Fauci have problems with public health, public safety, and economics, but also with basic human rights and embryology.

FOR MORE INFORMATION

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/report-links-fauci-u.s-govt-funding-to-origin-of-man-made-covid-19-in-china

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-flu-virus-risk-worth-taking/2011/12/30/gIQAM9sNRP_story.html

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2014/10/17/doing-diligence-assess-risks-and-benefits-life-sciences-gain-function-research

**Photo Credit: Official White House Photo by Tia Dufour

  Hide Petition Text

To this end “they excluded all of the listed 22 bullet-point [adverse events] … they didn’t include a single one of those on their fact sheets that accompany the emergency use authorization sheets for each vaccine,” noted Ardis.

LifeSiteNews reached out to the FDA for clarification on the nature of the CBER document and whether the advisories within were specific to the COVID jabs or if such monitoring documents are general and apply to many vaccines. No response was received before publication.

Meanwhile, CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky has reversed the recent guidance that permitted “fully vaccinated” individuals the freedom not to don a mask while indoors, apparently owing to breakthrough infections rising among vaccinated people. “To maximize protection from the Delta variant and prevent possibly spreading it to others, wear a mask indoors in public if you are in an area of substantial or high transmission,” the new guidance for vaccinated individuals now determines.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.