Featured Image

LOS ANGELES (LifeSiteNews) — Christian doctors in California are suing the state after it passed a bill removing a doctor’s right to refuse to participate in assisted suicide and euthanasia. 

On behalf of the Christian Medical & Dental Associations (CMDA) and Dr. Leslee Cochrane, the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) has filed a lawsuit against California Attorney General Rob Bonta, Director of the Department of Public Health Tomas Aragon, and the state’s Medical Board.

Filed February 22 in the U.S. District of the Central District of California, the lawsuit is in response to bill SB 380, which was signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom on October 5, 2021, and removes a physician’s right not to participate in assisted suicide.

“Despite the medical-ethics consensus that no physician should be forced to participate in physician-assisted suicide even where the practice is allowed, California recently legislated to not only eliminate important safeguards from the End of Life Options Act, but also force conscientious physicians to participate in the process,” the ADF stated.

Assisted suicide was legalized in the state in 2015, under the End of Life Option Act. Under the Act, physicians were able to opt out of participating in assisted suicide, and remained free from liability for “refusing to inform” a patient about his “right” to assisted suicide and for refusing to refer a patient to a doctor who supported euthanasia.

However, the new legislation, which took effect January 1, 2022, removes such safeguards for the physician. SB 380 states that “participating” in assisted suicide remains “voluntary,” but adds that physicians who refuse to take part in assisted suicide must refer their patient to a doctor who is not opposed to it: 

This bill would require a health care provider who is unable or unwilling to participate under the act to inform the individual seeking an aid-in-dying medication that they do not participate, document the date of the individual’s request and the provider’s notice of their objection, and transfer their relevant medical record upon request.

However, owing to a peculiarly narrow use of the term “participation,” SB 380 actually “mandates that physicians engage in statutorily required steps to advance the patient toward assisted suicide, but defines ‘participate’ so narrowly that engaging in these steps of actively facilitating assisted suicide does not fall within the statutory definition of ‘participating,’” protested the ADF.

Both the CMDA and Dr. Cochrane’s “personal religious convictions and professional ethics oppose the practice of assisted suicide,” ADF’s lawsuit reads. 

The CMDA comprises around 16,000 members across the country, the majority of which remain firmly opposed to assisting euthanasia. “Over 90% of CMDA members would rather stop practicing medicine than be forced to participate in assisted suicide or other practices in violation of their consciences,” argued the ADF. 

The lawsuit claims that SB 380 “imposes a substantial burden on all religiously motivated California physicians who refuse to participate in assisted suicide.” 

“It forces religiously objecting California physicians, including CMDA members and Dr. Cochrane, to choose between abandoning their livelihoods or obeying government commands that violate their religious conscience and compel them to speak and act in ways that contravene their religious faith,” argued the ADF.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Urge U.S. Senate to vote down abortion defender Ketanji Brown Jackson
  Show Petition Text
7748 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 9000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Joe Biden’s pick to replace the retiring Justice Stephen Breyer on the U.S. Supreme Court is abortion defender D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first black woman nominated to the nation's highest court ever.

By choosing Brown Jackson, Biden is fulfilling two campaign promises at the same time: first, to use every tool at his disposal to defend and promote the killing of the most innocent; and, second, to make the nation’s highest court more "diverse."

Of course, Biden could have achieved "diversity" by different means (and, as a "Catholic," he should have), but, as throughout the rest of tenure in office, he has chosen to pursue the deadly path of promoting abortion.

And, make no mistake: Planned Parenthood and NARAL are ecstatic about Brown Jackson.

SIGN and SHARE this petition which urges all U.S. Senators to reject abortion activist Brown Jackson's nomination to the Supreme Court.

Unlike most previous nominees to the Supreme Court, Brown Jackson has a judicial history of supporting abortion - which should be enough to cause Senators to reject her.

In the 1990s, she wrote an amicus brief defending a Massachusetts law that banned protests outside of abortion clinics. Thankfully, the law was ruled unconstitutional in 2000, but it shows how Brown Jackson intends to use the law to silence free speech so that the killing can continue without protest.

Pro-lifers are unanimous in their opposition to Brown Jackson, while the pro-abortionists are undivided in their zeal for her nomination.

SIGN and SHARE this petition which urges all U.S. Senators to reject abortion activist Brown Jackson's nomination to the Supreme Court.

Carrie Severino, president of the pro-life Judicial Crisis Network, warned of an imminent free speech threat, stating that in her "buffer-zone" amicus brief, Brown Jackson "repeatedly disparaged the peaceful and often prayerful clinic protesters as engaging in ‘in-your-face’ and ‘chaotic’ activity that somehow fell short of ‘pure speech.’"

And, Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the pro-life Susan B. Anthony List stated her organization's opposition to Brown Jackson's nomination, saying: "She is on record opposing the free speech rights of pro-life advocates pleading to save lives outside abortion centers and supporting the false claim that abortion is ‘health care.’"

But, the country's top abortion groups are celebrating Brown Jackson’s appointment.

Planned Parenthood CEO Alexis McGill Johnson wrote in a tweet addressed to Jackson: "We can’t wait to see the fantastic work you will do and will be here to support you along the way,"

And, NARAL Pro-Choice America President Mini Timmaraju agreed.

"Judge Jackson … has a demonstrated record of defending and upholding our constitutional rights and fundamental freedoms — including reproductive freedom," Timmaraju said. "We are confident that she will be a voice for justice, equity, and freedom on the Court in the decades to come."

Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition which urges all U.S. Senators to reject abortion activist Brown Jackson's nomination to the Supreme Court.


'Biden announces Ketanji Brown Jackson to replace Stephen Breyer on Supreme Court' -

'Pro-life groups warn about Biden’s Supreme Court nominee' -

'These Republicans could help Biden install his far-left Supreme Court pick' -

**Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

  Hide Petition Text

“Our clients seek to live out their faith in their medical practice, and that includes valuing every human life entrusted to their care,” declared ADF Senior Counsel Denise Harle. 

“Participating in, or referring a patient for, physician-assisted suicide very clearly would violate their consciences,” said Harle. “No health care professional should be forced to act against their religious beliefs and medical ethics, and the state of California is wrong to enforce such coercion.”

As noted by the ADF, a physician’s right to refuse to participate in assisted suicide is even defended by the American Medical Association, whose code of ethics’ states: 

Permitting physicians to engage in assisted suicide would ultimately cause more harm than good. Physician-assisted suicide is fundamentally incompatible with the physician’s role as healer, would be difficult or impossible to control, and would pose serious societal risks.

ADF Senior Counsel Kevin Theriot added that “allowing doctors to exercise their best medical judgment consistent with their personal moral principles has long been widely accepted in the medical community; that includes allowing them to decline to participate in ending a patient’s life.”

“It’s vital that the state protect faith-based physicians so they can continue to offer their valuable services to their communities without violating their deeply held religious beliefs—the very beliefs that made them passionate to serve others through this profession,” Theriot added.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.