Christian model crusades to protect young girls against hyper-sexed Cosmo Magazine
WOODLAND HILLS, California, March 2, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Nicole Weider was at the top of her game in the modeling world, landing jobs with Victoria’s Secret and appearing on the covers of magazines like Maxim and Esquire, when a deep depression left her disconcerted about the way the fashion industry used her body for profit.
“People have no idea about the extent of what girls are willing to do in order to be famous,” said Weider to LifeSiteNews. “I’ve seen first hand so many celebrities ruin their lives and compromise their values in order to stay relevant in the media. This means doing whatever it takes, whether it be wearing revealing clothing, selling your body in a sexual way, poising for Playboy, or even making a porn tape.”
Weider remembers the personal cost of her own effort to stay relevant: “I just felt degraded. The photographer was like, ‘Nicole bend down, go lower, stick your chest out, suck in your stomach.’ I felt bad about myself,” she recounted in an interview with CBN.
In the midst of her dark days a Christian friend encouraged the model to turn to Christ for answers.
“I just said, God, show me that there’s a better way, and I accepted the Lord, and my mind was renewed through God,” recalled Weider. “I just realized that my mind was almost like clear, and I knew that I was put on this earth for a bigger purpose.”
As Weider discovered the ways of the Lord, she came to see that part of her purpose was to expose the lies and darkness of the fashion world. Her first target would be the fashion magazine Cosmopolitan for its hyper-sexualized objectification of girls.
“The central core of the magazine is all about pushing sex from a young age to girls and pushing it in a very graphic manner. It’s not just saying ‘oh, have sex with your spouse’ rather it’s saying ‘girls give it up right away to a hook-up’”.
“I’ve been researching the magazine really thoroughly,” Weider told LifeSiteNews, “and have been horrified at how explicit and graphic it really is … it encourages girls with advice like ‘I wish my last girlfriend participated in anal sex’.”
“It is so damaging because it’s so explicit,” she explained. “The sexual tips in there are just so pornographic and it’s so harmful to girls because you have girls as young as 13 or 14 buying the magazine and taking the contents to heart.”
Weider has created a petition to have the racy magazine covered in a nontransparent wrapper and sold only to adults 18 and older.
“Because Cosmo is the #1 best-selling women’s magazine, it’s easily available to young boys and girls at any age,” wrote Weider on a website that carries her petition. Since beginning her crusade Weider says she has received hundreds of stories from girls as young as 11 who have detailed how they “tried the sexual tips written about in Cosmo, only to get their hearts broken, or worse — getting pregnant or catching an STD.”
Weider told LifeSiteNews that a lot of parents are in the dark when it comes to how graphic the content really is. “So many girls are buying it without their parent’s awareness and putting it in their backpack and bringing it to school and sharing it with their friends who are 13 and 14 years old.”
“This publication has steadily declined into a full-on pornographic ‘how to’ guide for teens and vulnerable young girls,” wrote Weider on her website. “Every issue dares girls and encourages them to try new sex moves (including anal sex), engage in threesomes, experient (sic) with lesbianism, have public sex, watch porn, (with specific URLS listed- October 2011 issue) and using sex toys such as dildos, shower heads, and vibrating tongue rings to ‘please your man and stimulate your clitoris.’
“This readily available magazine has become one of the media’s worst influences on girls.”
Weider knows that taking on Cosmopolitan is a little like David taking on Goliath, but she believes that challenging a culture that over-sexualizes girls to the detriment of their psychological growth is worth every effort.
“I want to tell girls that they’re so beautiful and perfect the way God made them and they’re a masterpiece,” she said. “Don’t conform to what the pressure of the media is telling you to do, to be sexy. Don’t listen to the lies they are telling you because you’re so beautiful the way you are, and you’re so precious”.
Weider believes that with the “power of thousands, [and] God behind us, we CAN and WILL get Cosmo sold to adults only.”
So far her petition has been signed by 26,700 people. She is hoping to send 50,000 signatures to Cosmopolitan.
Weider received a letter from the Federal Trade Commission saying that they will look into the magazine’s content and start an investigation when they determine that Cosmopolitan is a threat to society. “This means they need more complaints — that is, signers of this petition,” said Weider.
Click here if you would like to sign the petition.
Visit Nicole Weider’s website Project Inspired.
‘Little miracles’: Mom gives birth to naturally-conceived quintuplets after refusing ‘selective reduction’
AUSTRALIA, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) -- A 26-year-old Australian mom has given birth to five healthy babies, all conceived naturally, after refusing the doctor’s advice that she must abort three of them in order to give the remaining two a better chance at life.
“After my initial ultrasound I was told I could consider the selection method to give 2 babies the best chance in life,” wrote mom Kim Tucci in a Facebook post last September.
“I watched a YouTube video on the procedure and I cried. I could never do that! Was I selfish for not giving two the chance of 100% survival? All I knew is that I already love them and that every heart beat I heard I connect with them more. For me life starts when a heart starts beating and all I know for sure is that I will do whatever it takes to bring them into this world healthy,” she wrote.
Last Thursday Kim and her husband Vaughn welcomed the five new members into their family — one boy and four girls —increasing the number of their children from 3 to 8. The babies were born at 30 weeks, 10 weeks early, due to insufficient space in Kim’s womb. They weighed on average about 2.5 pounds.
The quintuplets’ story began last March, after Kim and Vaughn had been trying for six months to conceive just one more child for their family. Due to health complications, Kim wondered if she would ever become a mother again.
After what she thought was an extra long cycle, she decided to take a pregnancy test.
“I was feeling tired and a little nauseated and thought I would take a pregnancy test just to get the ‘what if’ out of my head. To my shock and utter excitement it was positive,” she wrote on a Facebook post.
The parents got the shock of their lives when doctors confirmed in an ultrasound examination that there was not one baby, but five.
“After a long wait for the ultrasound we finally went in. The sonographer told me there were multiple gestational sacks, but she could only see a heart beat in two. I was so excited! Twins!”
“I was moved to another machine for a clearer view and had the head doctor come in and double check the findings. She started to count, one, two, three, four, five. Did i hear that correctly? Five? My legs start to shake uncontrollably and all i can do is laugh. The sonographer then told me the term for five is ‘quintuplets,’” Kim wrote.
Even though Kim began to feel stretched to the limit with all those human lives growing inside her, she chose to focus on her babies, and not herself, referring to them as “my five little miracles.”
“It's getting harder as each day passes to push through the pain, every part of my body aches and sleeping is becoming very painful. No amount of pillows are helping support my back and belly. Sometimes I get so upset that I just want to throw my hands up and give in.”
“Sometimes my pelvis becomes so stiff I can barely walk and my hips feel like they are grinding away constantly. I'm finding it hard to eat as I basically have no room left in my stomach, and the way it is positioned it's pushed all the way back with the babies leaning against it.”
“My skin on my belly is so stretched its painful and hot to touch. It literally feels like I have hives! No amount of cream helps relieve the discomfort. I have a lot of stretch marks now. Dealing with such a huge change in my body is hard.”
“Is it all worth it? Yes!!!! I will keep pushing through,” she wrote in one Facebook post days before the babies were born.
The newborns' names are Keith, Ali, Penelope, Tiffany, and Beatrix. They were born at King Edward Memorial Hospital in Subiaco, Western Australia. Mother and babies are reported to be doing well.
UN rights chief tells Catholic countries to legalize abortion over Zika virus: bishops and cardinal react
GENEVA, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) -- The United Nations, following the lead of international abortion activists, is now urging Latin American countries hit by the mosquito-borne Zika virus to lift restrictions on abortion for pregnant women who have contacted the virus and whose pre-born children may be at risk for birth defects, including having smaller than normal heads.
The UN human rights office said today that it is not enough for South American countries to urge women to postpone pregnancy without also offering them abortion as a final solution.
“How can they ask these women not to become pregnant, but not offer… the possibility to stop their pregnancies?” UN spokeswoman Cecile Pouilly told reporters.
UN human rights chief Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein said that governments should make available contraception and abortion services.
“Laws and policies that restrict (women’s) access to these services must be urgently reviewed in line with human rights obligations in order to ensure the right to health for all in practice,” he said.
But Brazil’s bishops strongly asserted yesterday that efforts should be made to eradicate the virus, not the people who may be infected by it.
The disease is “no justification whatsoever to promote abortion,” they said in a statement, adding that it is not morally acceptable to promote abortion “in the cases of microcephaly, as, unfortunately, some groups are proposing to the Supreme Federal Court, in a total lack of respect for the gift of life.”
Honduras Cardinal Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga has also come out strongly against the notion of “therapeutic abortions” as a response to the problem. Unlike Brazil where abortion is legal in the case of rape or health of the mother, abortion remains entirely illegal in Honduras.
“We should never talk about ‘therapeutic’ abortion,” the cardinal said in a homily at a February 3 Mass in Suyap. “Therapeutic abortion doesn’t exist. Therapeutic means curing, and abortion cures nothing. It takes innocent lives,” he said.
While the World Health Organization (WHO) declared an international public health emergency February 1 on account of concerns over the virus, critics have pointed out, however, that not one death as resulted from the virus. Even on WHO’s own website the virus is described in mild terms.
“It causes mild fever and rash. Other symptoms include muscle pain, joint pain, headache, pain behind the eyes and conjunctivitis. Zika virus disease is usually mild, with symptoms lasting only a few days,” the website states. “To date, there have been no reported deaths associated with Zika virus,” it added.
Critics suspect that the crisis is being manipulated to advance an anti-human agenda on the pre-born.
“Is Zika, actually, a hideous virus that threatens to spread uncontrollably across the world creating an army of disabled children with tiny heads and low IQ’s? Or might this be a willful misinterpretation of the scarce data to manipulate public opinion and legislatures?” wrote pro-life critic Mei-Li Garcia earlier this week.
“It becomes very clear that the publicity surrounding this story has a very little to do with medicine and a lot to do with a convenient crisis that is being used by those pushing for the legalization of abortion around the world,” she wrote.
Hillary’s litmus test for Supreme Court picks: They must ‘preserve Roe v. Wade’
DERRY, NH, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) - Hillary Clinton has a litmus test for Supreme Court nominees - several, in fact. At a Democratic event on Wednesday, Clinton unveiled her criteria in selecting a judge for the nation's highest court.
“I do have a litmus test, I have a bunch of litmus tests," she said.
"We’ve got to make sure to preserve Roe v. Wade, not let it be nibbled away or repealed,” she said.
That echoes her recent call to arms speech before Planned Parenthood last month, when she stated that taxpayers must fund abortion-on-demand in order to uphold the "right" of choice.
“We have to preserve marriage equality,” Clinton said, referring to last summer's Obergefell v. Hodges case, a 5-4 ruling that redefined marriage nationwide. “We have to go further to end discrimination against the LGBT community."
Her views differentiate her from the Republican front runners. Ted Cruz has called the court's marriage ruling "fundamentally illegitimate," and Donald Trump told Fox News Sunday this week that he would "be very strong on putting certain judges on the bench that I think maybe could change things." Marco Rubio has said he won't "concede" the issue to the one-vote majority.
All Republican presidential hopefuls say they are pro-life and will defund Planned Parenthood.
Her husband, Bill Clinton, raised the makeup of the Supreme Court early last month in New Hampshire, saying it receives "almost no attention" as a campaign issue.
On Wednesday, Hillary said "the next president could get as many as three appointments. It’s one of the many reasons why we can’t turn the White House over to the Republicans again.”
Clinton said her judicial appointees must also reverse the Citizens United ruling on campaign finance and oppose a recent decision striking down a portion of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. In 2013's Shelby County v. Holder, justices struck down Section 4(b) of the act, which said that certain states and jurisdictions had to obtain permission from the federal government before changing their voting laws.
At one time, most politicians frowned upon any "litmus test" for judicial nominees, emphasizing the independence of the third branch of government. "I don't believe in litmus tests," Jeb Bush told Chuck Todd last November.
But with the rise of an activist judiciary in the middle of the 20th century, constitutionalists have sought to rein in the power of the bench.