News
Featured Image
 shutterstock.com

June 28, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – An international group of Christian pastors has collaborated to create a document in defense of the Biblical understanding of authority and liberty amid COVID-19 related lockdowns and medical mandates seen around the world.

“With the rise of COVID-19 and all of the attendant ramifications, it has been incumbent upon the church to come to terms with what it believes related to the intersecting areas of biblical ethics, authority, and medical mandates,” reads the preamble to the Warrenton Declaration on Medical Mandates, Biblical Ethics, & Authority, released Wednesday.

The declaration, initially signed by 24 Protestant church leaders from the U.S. and Europe, has since attracted the endorsement of at least another 140 co-signatories. The purpose of the document, according to the declaration website, is to “provide doctrinal clarity and coherence on issues of biblical authority and ethics related to medical mandates.”

To this end, the declaration raises 36 propositions both affirming biblical teachings about the rights and duties of man in relation to the just ruler and denying the false application of those principles. Broken into two distinct yet related sections, the declaration first focuses on “authority,” the opening statement of which affirms “that all authority, in heaven and on earth has been bestowed upon God the Son, Christ Jesus.”

But “due to a pervasive lack of theological and biblical understanding on these issues coupled with a tendency to over-attribute power and jurisdiction to the state,” the document’s preamble criticized that “oftentimes churches have defaulted to almost reflexively acquiescing to whatever government health agency statements are made and the policies they put in place.”

The declaration does not, however, simply discount all earthly authority as either unjust or able to be ignored in se, but calls on the historical Christian understanding of Church and state. The authors thus recognize that “earthly authorities have been instituted by God as His servants to function as a blessing to those in their jurisdiction through their Godly governance and rule according to God’s law and in obedience to Christ.”

Given the limits of the earthly ruler, the declaration affirms the obedience due to the state by its inhabitants can only extend as far as the commands of the regime are “non-sinful,” while “disobedience is also permissible should any command be given outside of the jurisdiction of the particular authority,” the group declare. As an example, they cite such evils as China’s infamous one- (later two- and now three-) child policy as well as governmental coercion into what they call “certain vocations.”

With the principle of authority according to the Bible having been set forth in the opening 15 statements, the declaration proceeds under the heading “Application to Medical Mandates,” the initial pronouncement of which is to categorically deny “that the civil authorities have been granted lawful jurisdiction and authority over personal, familial, or ‘public’ health.”

Expanding, the group explains that a misunderstanding of passages on leprosy in Leviticus 13 and 14, on their account, might lead Christians to believe that the state has direct charge over matters of biological contagion. Instead, the authors suggest that these passages relate to a ceremonial uncleanness, meaning that the expulsion of the lepers in these chapters was not a treatise on the powers of government over public health.

Since the declaration sets out that governing “public health” is not an unlimited power, it therefore denies that governments “have lawful authority to enact ‘lockdowns’” on that same basis. Additionally, the group denied any scope for the government to justify mandating vaccines and face masks “based on the claim that unmasked or unvaccinated persons ‘present a general danger to the health of the public due to viral spread.’”

READ: Explosion in mandatory masking isn’t driven by science, but fear

The group doubled down, positing “that the existence of communicable viruses, viral testing mechanisms, or the invention of vaccinations” cannot create “a new standard of morality whereby a healthy person simply conducting their affairs in society without vaccination, viral testing, or wearing a mask is evidence of criminally or morally reckless behavior.”

“Moreover,” they say, “if such a standard for violation of medical freedom is adopted, conceivably, civil governments could permanently regulate and restrict every facet of life since according to this same rationale, various flu-like viruses can be unknowingly spread at all times.”

Accordingly, the group denies the right of state rulers to force or coerce “individuals or their children with any form of public banishment, fine, imprisonment, social ostracism, or other forms of coercion” into “wearing a mask or injecting a substance into their bodies.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: No to mandatory vaccination for the coronavirus
  Show Petition Text
1073047 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 1100000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

People of goodwill can disagree about the safety, efficacy and religious implications of a new vaccine for the coronavirus.

But, everyone should agree on this point:

No government can force anyone who has reached legal adulthood to be vaccinated for the coronavirus. Equally, no government can vaccinate minors for the coronavirus against the will of their parents or guardians.

Please SIGN this urgent petition which urges policymakers at every level of government to reject calls for mandatory coronavirus vaccination.

Fear of a disease - which we know very little about, relative to other similar diseases - must not lead to knee-jerk reactions regarding public health, nor can it justify supporting the hidden agenda of governmental as well as non-governmental bodies that have apparent conflicts of interest in plans to restrict personal freedoms. 

The so-called "public health experts" have gotten it wrong many times during the current crisis. We should not, therefore, allow their opinions to rush decision-makers into policies regarding vaccination.

And, while some people, like Bill Gates, may have a lot of money, his opinion and that of his NGO (the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) - namely, that life will not return to normal till people are widely vaccinated - should not be permitted to influence policy decisions on a coronavirus vaccination program.

Finally, we must also not allow the rush by pharmaceutical companies to produce a new coronavirus vaccine to, itself, become an imperative for vaccination.

Unwitting citizens must not be used as guinea pigs for New World Order ideologues, or Big Pharma, in pursuit of a vaccine (and, profits) which may not even protect against future mutated strains of the coronavirus.

And it goes without saying that the production of vaccines using aborted babies for cell replication is a total non-starter, as the technique is gravely immoral.

However, if after sufficient study of the issue, a person who has reached the age of majority wishes to be vaccinated with a morally produced vaccine, along with his children, that is his business.

But we cannot and will not permit the government to make that decision for us.

Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition, urging policymakers at all levels of government to reject mandatory coronavirus vaccination.

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Bill Gates: Life won’t go back to ‘normal’ until population 'widely vaccinated' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bill-gates-life-wont-go-back-to-normal-until-population-widely-vaccinated

COVID-19 scare leads to more digital surveillance, talk of mandatory vaccine 'tattoos' for kids' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covid-19-scare-leads-to-more-digital-surveillance-talk-of-mandatory-vaccine-tattoos-for-kids

Trudeau says no return to ‘normal’ without vaccine: 'Could take 12 to 18 months' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-says-no-return-to-normal-without-vaccine-could-take-12-to-18-months

Trudeau mulls making coronavirus vaccine mandatory for Canadians - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-mulls-making-coronavirus-vaccine-mandatory-for-canadians

US bishop vows to ‘refuse’ COVID-19 vaccine if made from ‘aborted fetal tissue' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-bishop-vows-to-refuse-covid-19-vaccine-if-made-from-aborted-fetal-tissue

** While LifeSite opposes immorally-produced vaccines using aborted fetal cell lines, we do not have a position on any particular coronavirus vaccines produced without such moral problems. We realize many have general concerns about vaccines, but also recognize that millions of lives have been saved due to vaccines.

*** Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com

  Hide Petition Text

Perhaps more contentious within Christian circles is the application of Christ’s command to “love your neighbor as yourself” (Matt 22:39) as well as performing one’s “Christian obligation to the weaker brother” (1 Cor 8:1–12). In answer to these commands, the Warrenton Declaration states that those “who seek to bind the conscience of the believer by insisting that conformity with mask or vaccination mandates is the only way for a Christian to fulfil the command to ‘love one’s neighbor as oneself” are treating the traditions of man as the commandments of God.”

Continuing, the group accuses such individuals as being “guilty of twisting the Scriptures and are effectively subjecting the law of God to the ever-changing and conflicting whims of ‘public health’ agencies, the latest medical study, or majority opinion.”

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.