News
Featured Image
 Shutterstock.com

CAMBRIDGE, Massachusetts (LifeSiteNews) – Members of the Cambridge City Council debated Tuesday an amendment to ban the licensing of pro-life crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) and impose legal limits on what they can publish, though the measure drew opposition on constitutional grounds.

The Harvard Crimson reported that the proposed amendment would prohibit licensing entities that “present themselves as providing pregnancy related services but instead seek to persuade people against having an abortion,” and forbid any “limited-services pregnancy center” from publishing material it “knows or reasonably should know” to be “deceptive, whether by statement or omission.” No such centers currently operate in the city.

CPCs offer a wide range of support to women facing unplanned and unwanted pregnancies, including housing, counseling, information, medical resources, adoption information, childcare supplies, and parenting classes, and have outnumbered Planned Parenthood locations since well before the end of Roe v. Wade, (2,700+ CPCs versus roughly 600 PPs).

But City Solicitor Nancy Glowa told the meeting that her office determined “this could be an unconstitutional regulation of free speech” under both the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the Sixteenth Amendment of the Massachusetts Constitution. One of the cosponsors, Councilor Patricia Nolan, responded that she and her colleagues would “take into account” the constitutional issue and try to come up with a version “narrowly enough construed” to survive legal challenge. “The goal, I think, of the Council is to do all we can to ensure that there’s not deceptive information being promulgated in the city.”

CPCs have long been a target of left-wing rage for offering an alternative to the abortion industry, with attacks often focusing on claims that they deceive women, both about abortion and about their own services. But the pro-life contentions most often derided as “misinformation” are in fact true, and accusations of self-misrepresentation typically refer to little more than the fact that ads for them appear in online searches for the term “abortion.”

Notably, the Crimson added, “[d]uring the public comment portion of the meeting, 10 speakers — including the executive director of a Boston-based limited-services pregnancy center — spoke against the proposal. None spoke in favor.”

Left-wing hostility to CPCs drastically intensified with the U.S. Supreme Court’s June overturn of Roe, which triggered the reactivation of numerous state laws that forced scores of Planned Parenthood facilities across the country to shut down. CPCs became the targets of violence, vandalism, and threats, and politicians including President Joe Biden, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer have called for new limits on their funding, speech rights, and very existence.

A Change.org petition in support of the Cambridge amendment currently has 333 signatures.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

5 Comments

    Loading...