By Hilary White

SPRINGFIELD, January 20, 2006 ( – Since Terri Schiavo’s court-ordered, agonizing death by dehydration, the enthusiasm of euthanasia advocates has increased for using this painful method to kill patients dependent on feeding tubes. The latest case to make the news, is that of Haleigh Poutre, an 11 year-old girl admitted to hospital in September 2005 with brain damage that left her dependent upon assisted respiration and feeding.

On Tuesday, the Massachusetts Supreme Court allowed her doctors to stop the respirator. To the doctors’ surprise, Haleigh began to breathe on her own and started showing signs of coming out of the coma she had suffered for 4 months.

The Court, however, is not ruling out the possibility that Haleigh, now a ward of the state, can still be dehydrated to death. The Boston Globe said Wednesday that the court is deferring the decision to remove Haleigh’s feeding and hydration tube until further medical evidence has been established for her improvement.

Denise Monteiro, a spokeswoman for the state’s Department of Social Services, said, “There’s a possible change in her condition. She’s having some responses.”

Peg Whitbread, president of Massachusetts Citizens for Life said, “It’s disturbing. The SJC is saying the state has a right to euthanize a severely disabled ward of the state.”

Mark Dupont, a spokesman for the Diocese of Springfield said, “We certainly share the concerns of many who feel the whole matter has been rushed.”

Her stepfather Jason Strickland and her aunt Holly Strickland, who adopted the girl, were charged with criminal assault for allegedly beating her with a baseball bat which resulted in her comatose state. Strickland, despite being charged in Haleigh’s abuse, has petitioned the department of social services to stop the decision to euthanize her.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.