June 24, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — A Democratic congressman from California suggested that the Catholic Church ought to lose its tax-exempt status if the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) decides to follow Church law and deny Communion to pro-abortion politicians like President Joe Biden.
In a June 18 tweet, Rep. Jared Huffman (D-CA) said, “If they’re going to politically weaponize religion by ‘rebuking’ Democrats who support women’s reproductive choice, then a ‘rebuke’ of their tax-exempt status may be in order.”
Huffman, who serves on a variety of caucuses — including the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Equality Caucus and the House Pro-Choice Caucus — raised eyebrows several weeks ago when he announced that attendees of this year’s first in-person townhall in his district would be required to show proof of vaccination while unvaccinated members would be relegated to attending online.
The congressman’s tweet threatening retaliation against the Catholic Church came in connection to a “Statement of Principles” put out on the same day by 60 “Catholic Democrats in Congress,” in response to the USCCB’s June 2021 meeting.
On June 18 the bishops announced that they had voted on a resolution to draft a document which will assess the “meaning of the Eucharist in the life of the Church.” The resolution passed with 168 in favor, 55 against, and 6 abstentions. The document is likely to be presented for discussion when the bishops reconvene in November.
The 60 self-proclaimed Catholic Democrat congressmen have expressed their dissatisfaction with the bishops, arguing that Communion should not be denied them despite holding views at odds with Church teaching.
The pro-abortion congressmen say they are “proud to be part of the living Catholic tradition” and claim they “work every day to advance respect for life and the dignity of every human being, adding that they are “committed to making real the basic principles that are at the heart of Catholic social teaching.”
The statement goes on to list a grab-bag of Democrat policy items which it calls “basic principles of Catholic social teaching” including addressing “racial and gender inequities.”
According to the statement, the signers support alternatives to abortion, “envision a world in which every child belongs to a loving family and agree with the Catholic Church about the value of human life,” but also believe in “the primacy of conscience.”
“In recognizing the Church's role in providing moral leadership, we acknowledge and accept the tension that comes with being in disagreement with the Church in some areas,” the statement reads.
The signers go on to argue that “[t]he Sacrament of Holy Communion is central to the life of practicing Catholics, and the weaponization of the Eucharist to Democratic lawmakers for their support of a woman’s safe and legal access to abortion is contradictory.”
The statement decries the fact that politicians are not denied Communion for supporting other policies which they claim are contrary to the Church teaching, including the death penalty and legislation aimed at stopping or reducing immigration.
Pope Francis had attempted to change the Church’s teaching on the death penalty by revising the Catechism of the Catholic Church in 2018. Prior to that, the Church has always held that the death penalty, as punishment for a crime of a certain magnitude, is in principle always permissible.
It is not clear why the Democrats argue that the Catholic Church support unregulated immigration, nor how questions of immigration compare to the killing of unborn children.
The parents of Alta Fixsler are pleading with the British courts not to remove life support from their brain-damaged daughter, so that they can transport her to a hospital in Israel or the U.S.
Could you do your part and SIGN and SHARE this petition which asks the British courts and hospital system to allow the Fixslers to remove their daughter from the UK so that she can live, and not be killed by so-called "passive euthanasia" where her life support is taken away?
Late last month, High Court Justice Mr. Alistair McDonald insanely ruled that it is in Alta's "best interests" to have her life support stopped, and that Manchester University NHS could begin the process of removing her life support.
But, Mr. and Mrs. Fixsler, who are are Orthodox Jews living according to Hebrew law, strenuously objected to the hospital depriving Alta of life support and she was given a reprieve, but we don't know how long that will last.
In fact, just yesterday, a British Court of Appeal declined to render judgement in this case, giving more hope that little Alta might be able to leave the UK and be treated in another country.
And, both American and Israeli lawmakers have spoken up against the planned passive euthanasia death of Alta, with a host of U.S. Senators, as well as the Israeli Health Minister and President, petitioning different British officials to stop the process of causing Alta's death.
We concur with what the Senators wrote: "It is unacceptable that people in government think they, not parents, should decide what is in the best interest of a child, even in a matter of life and death."
Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition now.
The story of a brain-damaged child in England in danger of a passive euthanasia opposed by both his or her parents and officials overseas is now a distressingly familiar one.
In the 2017 case of Charlie Gard, Pope Francis, President Donald Trump, and 37 European MPs sided with the infant’s parents against the British courts that agreed to allow the NHS to withdraw his life support. Almost one-year-old Charlie died 12 minutes after he was removed from a ventilator.
In 2018, Tom Evans, the Catholic father of Alfie Evans, appealed to Pope Francis on behalf of his almost two-year-old son, and the pontiff did indeed ask for prayers for the youngster. Both Polish and Italian hospitals were willing to treat the brain-injured boy, but the British courts refused to release him. Alfie died four days after he was removed from a ventilator.
In 2019, Tafida Raqeeb, then five years old, made headlines when her Muslim parents fought the Barts Health NHS Trust’s request to stop treating the brain-damaged girl. Once again, an Italian hospital offered to treat the sick child, and in this case the judge – Mr Justice Alistair MacDonald – ruled that the child could be allowed to live and taken to Italy for treatment.
And, in 2021, six-year-old Pippa Knight was not permitted to live despite the wishes of her widowed mother Paula. Pippa died in May after doctors removed her life support.
RIGHT NOW, please help little Alta and her parents fight for her right to live, and not be killed by having her life support removed.
Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this urgent petition.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
'No judgment yet: Panel to ‘think carefully’ about taking 2-year-old Alta Fixsler off life support' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/no-judgment-yet-panel-to-think-carefully-about-taking-2-year-old-alta-fixsler-off-life-support
'US senators, Israeli officials appeal against UK High Court decision to deny Jewish toddler food, water, oxygen' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-senators-israeli-officials-appeal-against-uk-high-court-decision-to-deny-jewish-toddler-food-water-oxygen
'Judge rules Jewish girl's life support can be withdrawn' - https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-manchester-57276221
Photo Credit: screenshot / 'PA'
The congressmen go on to “solemnly urge” U.S. Catholic bishops not to “move forward and deny this most holy of all sacraments, the source and the summit of the whole work of the gospel over one issue.”
The “one issue” of abortion is a profound one for Catholics, because it is presupposed by all other rights.
As Pope Benedict XVI said in 2007 in an address in Vienna, “The fundamental human right, the presupposition of every other right, is the right to life itself. This is true of life from the moment of conception until its natural end. Abortion, consequently, cannot be a human right — it is the very opposite.”
According to Catholic teaching, politicians are morally bound to oppose any legislation which would legalize or promote the taking of an innocent human life.
A 2002 doctrinal note from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith succinctly states that “those who are directly involved in lawmaking bodies have a grave and clear obligation to oppose any law that attacks human life. For them, as for every Catholic, it is impossible to promote such laws or to vote for them.”
Earlier this week Meghan McCain defended the Church’s stance on abortion, explaining, “All of these issues are life and death for Catholics, for devout Christians, and [President Biden is] going to have to ultimately talk to his Creator when the time comes as we all do, and reconcile his politics with his — with his personal faith.”
“I believe that he’s doing grave spiritual harm to himself and harm to this country,” McCain said.