Featured Image
A pro-assisted suicide protester shouts at Rep. Brad Wenstrup, R-Ohio.Twitter

WASHINGTON, D.C., September 29, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) – A bipartisan group of Congressmen introduced a “Sense of Congress” resolution condemning physician-assisted suicide on Wednesday.

This type of resolution neither creates a law nor is enforceable. It is a way for members of Congress to express an opinion. The Republican-controlled Congress could have blocked Washington, D.C.'s assisted suicide law after it was enacted but failed to do so.

Rep. Brad Wenstrup, R-Ohio, introduced the resolution, which warns that physician-assisted suicide “puts everyone, including those most vulnerable, at risk of deadly harm and undermines the integrity of the healthcare system.”

A coalition of disability and patients’ rights groups joined Wenstrup in introducing the resolution. A pro-assisted suicide protester interrupted Wenstrup as he introduced the bill, accusing him of not telling the truth. His comments can be heard in the distance on the Patients Rights Action Fund's video of the press conference.

Another screamed at him for “voting many times to kill thousands of people more, millions of people more than assisted suicide ever will.”

After the resolution’s press conference during a question and answer session, a woman with ovarian cancer detailed the pain and many hospital visits caused by her disease, saying she wants the option to kill herself.

The woman accused the coalition of “spreading misinformation,” not speaking for D.C. residents, and seeking to “impose your will and your beliefs on me.”

One of the disability rights activists, who uses a wheelchair, responded.

“We’re not denying that there’s things wrong with the healthcare policies,” the disability rights advocate said. “There’s tons of things that need to be fixed in our healthcare policies – tons.”

“When you take away choice from people that are helpless and defenseless and you impose policies to make (assisted suicide) legal then you basically sign everybody here’s death certificates. That’s what you don’t see,” she said.

“You might want to die and we, we understand that,” she continued. “And we want you to go peacefully. And I’m sorry that you’re going through what you’re going through. But all of us have suffered greatly in this room. All of us have.”

In tears, she went on, “You don’t know how many people have told us to our faces, ‘you guys should be dead,’ and how hard we have fought just to be treated like human beings … and not some thing in a chair. That’s what it’s about.”

“I’m sorry that you’re going through what you’re going through, but the point is, you’re still alive,” she concluded. “Look at the good things about it. You can get up. You can go to the bathroom on your own. Do you know what I would give to be able to do that?”

The exchange begins 30 minutes into the video of the press conference

'Solution to suffering is not to end the life of the sufferer'

The Patients Rights Action Fund, Physicians for Compassionate Care, National Council on Independent Living, ADAPT, Not Dead Yet, and the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund praised Wenstrup and his colleagues for speaking out against assisted suicide.

“Many do not realize that people battling terminal illness, people with disabilities and others are inadvertently targeted by the legalization of assisted suicide,” said JJ Hanson, a terminal cancer patient who is the President of the Patients Rights Action Fund. “I am grateful to Congressmen Correa, Vargas, Wenstrup and all of the other co-sponsors for introducing a Sense of Congress resolution. This bill brings attention to this important issue and takes a big step toward protecting me and so many others.”

In 2015, the Patients Rights Action Fund released a video of Hanson with his wife and young son explaining how in 2014, he was only given a few months to live when he was diagnosed with the deadliest form of brain cancer. He's still alive today.

“Empowering doctors to assist patients in killing themselves has led to an inevitable erosion of trust in the motives of doctors, healthcare institutions, and insurers,” said William F. Toffler, national director of Physicians for Compassionate Care Education Fund. “This has been detrimental to patients, degraded the quality of medical care, and compromised the integrity of medical profession wherever assisted suicide has been legalized. The solution to suffering is not to end the life of the sufferer; rather society's focus at the end of life should be to alleviate suffering by improving access to hospice and palliative care whenever it is needed.”

'Equal rights include equal suicide prevention'

The resolution notes that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled twice, in Washington v. Glucksberg and Vacco v. Quill, that there is no constitutional right to assisted suicide. The Court ruled “that the Government has a legitimate interest in prohibiting assisted suicide, and that such prohibitions rationally relate to ‘protecting the vulnerable from coercion’ and ‘protecting disabled and terminally ill people from prejudice, negative and inaccurate stereotypes, and ‘societal indifference.’”

Laws legalizing assisted suicide have been passed in five states and the District of Columbia.

A Montana court ruling allows doctors who are prosecuted to use the patient’s request to die as a potentially viable defense in court. Twenty-three other states have rejected bills attempting to legalize assisted suicide since the beginning of 2017. More than 30 states have rejected over 200 attempts at legalization since 1994.

“Our society places a high value on physical appearance and ability, and stigmatizes significant disability. It's no surprise that those of us who grew up able-bodied and then became disabled might initially see disability as a huge loss of one’s former dreams and physical abilities,” said Kelly Buckland of the National Council on Assisted Living.

“When someone is first hit with this, they may feel they’d be better off dead. As one struggles to get basic needs met, some people feel worn down,” she continued.

Buckland explained that had assisted suicide been legal in the past, “even if it were supposedly only for those with ‘terminal’ conditions, I might not be here today.”

“I’m grateful that assisted suicide was not legal back then, and I'm committed to keeping it that way,” she continued. “This is an important reason why the National Council on Independent Living opposes assisted suicide laws. NCIL is a leader in the disability rights movement, our political struggle for equal rights. And, among other things, equal rights include equal suicide prevention.”

The resolution has nine co-sponsors, five of whom are Democrats. The co-sponsors are:

  • Rep. Luis J. Correa, D-California
  • Rep. Juan Vargas, D-California
  • Rep. James Langevin, D-Rhode Island
  • Rep. Dan Lipinski, D-Illinois
  • Rep. Andy Harris, R-Maryland
  • Rep. Darin LaHood, R-Illinois
  • Rep. Ralph Lee Abraham, R-Louisiana
  • Rep. Keith J. Rothfus, R-Pennsylvania
  • Rep. Thomas R. Suozzi, D-New York

“The National Alliance Against Assisted Suicide shares this mission in general and collectively supports this specific legislation and no other at this time,” the Alliance stated in a press release.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.