News
Featured Image
National Health Service (NHS)Shutterstock

July 29, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — A distraught pregnant woman and her partner were threatened by a National Health Service (NHS) employee in the U.K. when they defended their right not to have their child tested for COVID-19.

In a video filmed by the baby’s father, the off-camera NHS worker can be heard telling the couple that their protest will be discussed with the safeguarding team.

“Just so I’m clear, this will be documented in your notes,” the female NHS staffer said. “We will let the neo-natal team know … and we will also ask the safeguarding team.”

This seemingly innocuous remark was immediately accepted as a threat by Stacey, the mother-to-be.

“And you’ll get social [services] involved, too,” she said and clapped in a bitter parody of last summer’s official Thursday evening “applaud the NHS” ritual. “You’re so good, aren’t you, you people?”

It is illegal to film inside hospitals, which may be why the father chose not to show anyone’s face. Nevertheless, he captured his partner’s exasperation with the NHS worker’s inability to accept that the couple does not want their baby to undergo the invasive test for COVID-19.

“I’m going to stop you now because I don’t want to hear no more of it,” Stacey said.

“You’ve told me about 5 bloody times, and I’m sick of hearing it,” she continued, as her partner worried about her stress levels. “I haven’t leaked [amniotic fluid] all day, and now I’m leaking. Do you think I really need this [rubbish] about COVID? I’ve got a risk of losing my baby …”

The baby’s father chimed in, telling the NHS workers, “You’re more worried about the COVID than the baby.”

“They’re not COVID-testing my baby, end of [story],” he added.

Stacey’s partner suggested that they get their things and go, but Stacey had a word to say to the NHS workers first about what patient care should look like.

“I know you don’t want me here really,” she said with candor. “I know you don’t want to do what you’ve got to do because of this stupid compliance crap.”

“But I’m sorry, when it comes to care for a patient … you’ve got to understand and listen to what they’re saying. You can’t tell me that you get to give me the [say-so] of what happens once my baby is born. I don’t think so.”

The mother stated that she had done her research, including speaking to police, and that she knew that the NHS staff couldn’t do anything to her baby without her permission.

Undaunted, the NHS worker made her subtle threats, informing Stacey and her partner that she would talk to the safeguarding team after the couple made it clear that the neo-natal team already knew their feelings about COVID-testing the baby.

In return, the baby’s father assured the NHS worker that the conversation would go viral. It appeared on the Twitter account of Dissent Media on July 28.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Fire Fauci and investigate him now!
  Show Petition Text
63637 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 70000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

PETITION UPDATE (5/12/2021)

It seems that Dr. Anthony Fauci's role in the NIH's funding of so-called "gain-of-function" research may be catching up with him.

In the last couple of days, both U.S. Senator Rand Paul and Fox's Tucker Carlson have laid into Fauci for his alleged promotion of this dangerous research which develops bat-based coronaviruses into more potent variants, capable of infecting humans.

Dr. Fauci denied funding this research.

But, Senator Paul noted that a resident virologist at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Dr. Shi Zheng-li and Dr. Ralph Baric, an American virologist funded by Fauci's department in the NIH, "collaborated on gain-of-function research where they enhanced the SARS virus to infect human airway cells and they did it by merging a new spy protein on it. That is gain-of-function. That was joint research between the Wuhan Institute and Dr. Baric. You [Dr. Fauci] can’t deny it."

And, later, Fox News host Tucker Carlson picked up on the discrepancy, noting Fauci’s involvement in the creation and promotion of public health directives on account of COVID-19 while also being allegedly tied to the origin of the virus and its spread throughout the world.

So, the evidence - both in testimony and in the court of public opinion - continues to mount.

Could we ask you to consider SIGNING and SHARING this important petition, which calls for Dr. Fauci to be fired and investigated for any role he played in promoting and funding the dangerous research which may have cost the world dearly in lives and jobs lost.

____________________________________________________

When concerned scientists warned the US government of the great danger of creating superviruses in the lab, one man publicly defended the risky experiments: that man was the influential head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), none other than "Mr. Science" himself: Dr. Anthony Fauci.

In 2014, the same year the US government called for a moratorium on this insanely dangerous research, Dr. Fauci's NIAID began funding a program to study the transmission of bat coronaviruses to humans.

Not only did his funding go to develop the technology for making bat coronaviruses spread more easily to humans, but much of it went to the lab located in the exact location where the Covid pandemic eventually emerged: Wuhan, China.

Like every person, Dr. Fauci deserves to be presumed innocent until proven guilty.

But the evidence is so overwhelming that Fauci gambled with a supervirus and lost (the whole world lost), that, at a minimum, he needs to be fired from his position of public trust and must be investigated for possible violations of US law which mandated a moratorium on this extremely dangerous practice of creating superviruses in the lab.

However Dr. Fauci, far from being held responsible for his dangerous gamble, has been promoted to the point where, currently, he is the highest paid employee in the US Government.

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition if you agree that Dr. Anthony Fauci should instead be immediately fired and investigated for his role in causing the Covid-19 pandemic. 

Just like the Wall Street moguls, whose financial negligence precipitated the financial crisis of 2008, received massive bailout bonuses, Dr. Anthony Fauci recklessly pushed for the research that probably caused the deadly pandemic. And now, he, too, has been rewarded with money and power.

As has been carefully and meticulously documented by Steve Hilton of Fox News, the probable origins of the coronavirus point to Dr. Anthony Fauci.  

Dr. Fauci was one of the greatest proponents of developing superviruses in labs.

Dr. Fauci was responsible for the funding of much of the research through the NIAID.

And, it appears that Dr. Fauci funneled taxpayer funds through an intermediary to allow the research to continue in the unsafe Wuhan Institute of Virology, even after the US government banned the funding of this dangerous research.

Until a thorough investigation into his role of the origins of the current pandemic has taken place, Dr. Fauci should not be in a position of public trust.

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition to demand that Dr. Fauci be fired immediately and investigated fully for his role in the creation of Covid-19 and the ensuing pandemic.

P.S. It should be noted that Dr. Fauci not only has proven to be catastrophic for public health with his advocacy of dangerous research, but he has also been a disastrous public health advisor, advocating measures that have negatively impacted every aspect of our lives, from the economy to our most fundamental liberties.

P.P.S. Dr. Anthony Fauci, recently stated that he is delighted to be pushing Joe Biden's return to US taxpayer funding of abortions abroad. So, evidently, not only does Dr. Fauci have problems with public health, public safety, and economics, but also with basic human rights and embryology.

FOR MORE INFORMATION

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/report-links-fauci-u.s-govt-funding-to-origin-of-man-made-covid-19-in-china

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-flu-virus-risk-worth-taking/2011/12/30/gIQAM9sNRP_story.html

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2014/10/17/doing-diligence-assess-risks-and-benefits-life-sciences-gain-function-research

**Photo Credit: Official White House Photo by Tia Dufour

  Hide Petition Text

Dissent Media said that he had reached out to a family spokesperson.

“I have spoken to a representative for the family involved and reached out with an offer of an uncensored interview,” he tweeted. “I await response.”

Not much is known about the family as yet, except that the parents speak with strong London or Essex accents that mark them as socially vulnerable in England’s persistently classist society.

“I’m not a Marxist, but time and time again we see parents from a working-class and/or religious background treated with a hermeneutic of suspicion,” CitizenGO UK’s Caroline Farrow told LifeSiteNews via social media.

“As far as the NHS are concerned, as soon as you take your child to hospital and seek treatment or advice, they become the custodians and primary decision-makers,” Farrow noted on Twitter.

“What do the parents of Alfie Evans, Charlie Gard, Isaiah Haastrup, Tafida Raqeeb and now Alta Fixsler have in common? All from either working class and/or religious minority backgrounds …,” she added.

With regards to that expectant woman and her partner, it’s very distressing seeing some of the comments attacking them for being working class. Sadly, too many hospitals seem to share this approach & act as though working class parents who disagree with them, lack capacity.”

Developing…

 

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.