News

SAN FRANCISCO, September 3, 2004 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A Chinese man who sought refuge in the U.S. and was originally denied asylum has been granted a reprieve by a U.S. appeals court. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the original judge had overlooked that Chinese officials had forcibly aborted Xiao Lan Zheng’s first child, and threatened to sterilize his wife after their second child was born.  Zheng and his wife, Xiu Qin Wen, were married in a traditional ceremony despite not having reached the legal age for marriage in the country. When Wen became pregnant with their first child at 19, officials forced her to abort the baby because she was not legally married in their eyes—all unwed mothers in China are forced to abort their children.  Three years later, Wen gave birth to a baby girl. Government officials requested that the couple apply for legal recognition of their marriage. They also ordered her to be sterilized, to prevent the couple from exceeding the country’s one-child law.  In 1999, Zheng fled China by boat. The boat was intercepted and Zheng was detained in Guam.  “Zheng is therefore eligible for asylum because of the forced abortion of his child even though China does not recognize his marriage to Wen,” Judge Raymond Fisher said, as reported by Reuters news.

Read related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:  U.S. Court Grants Asylum to Chinese Couple Threatened with Forced Abortion https://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2004/jan/04013003.html   tv

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.