News
Featured Image
 Antonio Guillem/Shutterstock

NEW YORK (LifeSiteNews) – A Christian adoption agency in New York recently won a lawsuit after a federal judge ruled the state could not require the organization to violate its religious beliefs by placing children with same-sex or unmarried couples.  

New Hope Family Services is a pro-life and pro-family nonprofit located in Syracuse which offers adoption, pregnancy, and other family support resources. The organization originally filed a lawsuit in 2018 in response to an investigation launched by the New York State Division of Human Rights. New Hope was represented by attorneys from Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF).

Last week, a federal court decision ruled against the efforts of both the Office of Children and Family Services (OCFS) and the State Division of Human Rights to force New Hope to offer adoption services to same-sex and unmarried couples.  

“The New York State Office of Children and Family Services singled out the nonprofit for its policy, guided by its religious beliefs, of placing children it serves in homes with a married mother and father,” ADF stated in a September 7 media release. “The summary judgment order from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York in New Hope Family Services v. Poole prohibits OCFS from enforcing state law ‘insofar as it would compel New Hope to process applications from, or place children for adoption with, same-sex couples or unmarried cohabitating couples, and insofar as it would prevent New Hope from referring such couples to other agencies.'”

READ: Christian bakers fined for gay ‘wedding’ cake refusal take case back to US Supreme Court

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Supreme Court must defend religious liberty of Christians who refused to bake gay-wedding cake
  Show Petition Text
4112 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 5000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

SIGN: The Supreme Court must hear the appeal of Aaron and Melissa Klein as they seek to vindicate their right to decline baking cakes that violate their religious beliefs.

Oregon bakers Aaron and Melissa Klein have been through hell since 2013 when they were sued for refusing to bake a gay-wedding cake that violated their religious beliefs as Christians.

They hope the Supreme Court will hear their appeal against a ruling that ultimately put Sweet Cakes by Melissa out of business and resulted in a state-imposed fine of $135,000.

This persecution of Christians by liberal judges must be corrected by the Supreme Court.

SIGN: I stand with Aaron and Melissa Klein in their fight for justice.

Melissa was forced to bake from home with her husband and five children in September 2013 when a sustained hate campaign dried up business at the store and eventually forced them to fold in 2016.

The Kleins have been embroiled in a never-ending struggle since to uphold the right of all Christians to decline participating in events and messages that violate their faith.

It's time Christians and people of good-will brought this terrible injustice to light. 

SIGN: We demand the U.S. Supreme Court hear the appeal of Aaron and Melissa Klein.

First Liberty lawyers hope the Supreme Court will overturn an Oregon ruling that put the Kleins out of business.

A statement by First Liberty reads: Our attorneys argue that the Constitution protects the Kleins and all Americans from being forced to express a message with which they disagree. The brief states, “Forcing artists to design, create, and decorate custom products against their strongest beliefs abridges the freedom protected by the Free Speech Clause” of the First Amendment.

“Having to shut down the shop was devastating,” Melissa told First Liberty. “Watching something our family had worked so hard on for years to build just disappear in such a short time—it crushed me.”

Thankfully the $135,000 fine was reduced to $30,000 this July by the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, but the principle at play is much more valuable to the Kleins than money. 

SIGN: The Supreme Court MUST defend the Klein's First Amendment rights.

Please SHARE this petition after signing it, as this case deserves the urgent attention of every American.

Thank you.

  Hide Petition Text

In the same release, ADF Senior Counsel Roger Brooks was quoted saying, “New Hope is a private religious ministry that doesn’t take a dime from the government. Shutting down an adoption provider for its religious beliefs—needlessly and unconstitutionally reducing the number of agencies willing to help—benefits no one—certainly not children … The decision from the court simply allows New Hope to continue serving the community so that more kids find permanent homes, more adoptive parents welcome a new child, and more birth parents enjoy the exceptional support that New Hope has offered for decades.”  

Brooks also released a statement in October 2020 that a court had ruled the state could not impede on the organization’s services during the ongoing litigation. Last week’s ruling made this decision permanent. 

According to the ADF case summary, the “New York State Office of Children and Family Services (OCFS) sent New Hope a letter demanding that the agency either revise its policy or shut down its adoption program.” This sparked the pro-life center’s lawsuit “to protect its ability to operate according to its beliefs.” 

While the agency continued its work with temporary protection, the summary also explains how “in August 2021, an individual apparently aware of New Hope’s beliefs contacted New Hope inquiring about adoption generally.” 

The organization’s director shared service options, including “an accurate description of New Hope’s religious beliefs and its priority of placing children in homes with a married mother and father.” Soon after, the “individual filed a complaint with the New York State Division of Human Rights.” An investigation was “promptly launched” by the state. 

Previously, the ADF has fought on behalf of other Christian adoption agencies under attack for the allegedly discriminatory practice of placing children in the care of a married man and woman. In March, ADF attorneys announced an agreement with Michigan officials regarding the right to refuse putting a child in the care of a same-sex couple. 

In 2020, the nonprofit legal group supported religious adoption agencies in Philadelphia as the decision of enabling placement in a family with a father and a mother awaited a ruling from the Supreme Court.  

RELATED: Supreme Court delivers narrow victory for religious freedom over LGBT ‘rights’

“Every child deserves a home with a loving mother and father who are committed to each other,” New Hope Executive Director Kathy Jerman said, according to the ADF. “New Hope is an ‘arm-around-the-shoulder’ ministry that walks with adoptive families and birth parents alike to place children with adoptive families. It’s regrettable that New York ever threatened to shut down our adoption services, through which we have placed more than 1,000 children with adoptive families since we began as an adoption agency in 1965. We’re grateful that the court’s decision allows us to keep serving children and families.” 

RELATED:

Biden admin scraps plan to withhold lunch funds from religious schools that don’t back LGBT agenda

Catholic nurse practitioner sues CVS after getting fired for refusing to dispense abortion drugs

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

6 Comments

    Loading...