Featured Image
Republican Congressman Steve King speaks at the 2012 March for Life in Washington, D.C. Congressman King's Flickr page
Ben Johnson Ben Johnson Follow Ben

News

New bill would strip federal courts’ ability to redefine marriage

Ben Johnson Ben Johnson Follow Ben

WASHINGTON, D.C., April 30, 2015 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Observers on both sides of the fight to protect marriage now await the Supreme Court's ruling about whether the Constitution confers a right to same-sex “marriage.” But some pro-family leaders in Congress have introduced a bill to get the judges out of the business of redefining marriage.

Congressman Steve King, R-IA, introduced the Restrain the Judges on Marriage Act of 2015, which would strip all federal courts of the right to change state laws on marriage.

“For too long, federal courts have overstepped their constitutionally limited duty to interpret the Constitution,” Congressman King said. “Rather, federal courts have perverted the Constitution to make law and create constitutional rights to things such as privacy, birth control, and abortion. These unenumerated, so-called constitutionally-protected rights were not envisioned by our Founding Fathers."

"My bill would stop the court from destroying traditional marriage and preserve the votes of millions of voters in states that have passed bans on same sex marriage," the Iowa Republican – who has a strong record as a pro-life conservative – added.

His bill would prohibit federal courts from ruling on the issue and states that “no federal funds” will be used to try, or enforce, such rulings.

Although seldom-invoked, Congress has the power under Article III of the U.S. Constitution to exempt certain issues from judicial review, even from the Supreme Court – and even after arguments have begun.

Congress passed just such a bill to prevent the U.S. Supreme Court from ruling on the case Ex Parte McCardle in 1869. Justices had heard the arguments but not yet made a decision when Congress overrode the veto of President Andrew Johnson. The High Court acknowledged Congressional authority had been withdrawn and did not issue an independent ruling.

“Without jurisdiction the court cannot proceed at all in any case. Jurisdiction is power to declare the law, and when it ceases to exist, the only function remaining to the Court is that of announcing the fact and dismissing the case,” the Court ruled. “The appeal of the petitioner in this case must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.”

As the nation's courts have intervened on social issues in anti-democratic ways, the idea has cropped up time and again. The late Sen. Jesse Helms endorsed such a notion about school prayer in the 1980s.

Newt Gingrich, the former Speaker of the House, said on the campaign trail in 2011, “The Congress can pass a law and can limit the Court’s jurisdiction. It’s written directly in the Constitution.”

Congressman Ron Paul agreed that “Congress could statutorily remove whole issues like gay marriage from the federal judiciary.”

Former Congresswoman Michele Bachmann also specifically endorsed limiting court authority over the issue of same-sex “marriage.”

Same-sex “marriage” was imposed by court order in Massachusetts and Iowa, then by a host of federal judges in all but 11 of the states where the ancient institution has been redefined.

U.S. Supreme Court justices heard oral arguments on the subject in Obergefell v. Hodges on Tuesday. The same day, Congressman King led a pro-family rally on the Supreme Court's steps and, later that day, told Newsmax.com journalist Steve Malzberg that the “family unit is the essential building block of all society.”

"What's good for kids is to have a father role, a mother role and the two of them coming together making that sacrifice so that the children have the best opportunities to succeed," he said. "That's why we [hold] marriage so strongly and we've done so throughout all of the millennia” – a word cited by Justice Anthony Kennedy during the arguments.

Iowa Democratic Party Chairwoman Andy McGuire denounced what she described as King's “regressive and intolerant rhetoric.”

“As the GOP works to turn back the clock, Iowa Democrats will stay committed to progress and equality,” she told the Omaha World-Herald.

Click "like" if you want to defend true marriage.

In response to his bill, Colorado Democratic Congressman Jared Polis mockingly introduced the “Restrain Steve King from Legislating Act.”

King's bill currently has nine co-sponsors, all Republicans: Brian Babin of Texas, Jeff Duncan of South Carolina, Louie Gohmert of Texas, Thomas Massie of Kentucky, Doug LaMalfa of California, Steven Palazzo of Mississippi, Glenn Thompson of Pennsylvania, Tim Walberg of Michigan, and Ted Yoho of Florida.

There is no indication that House leadership intends to bring his bill to the floor for a vote.

Get FREE pro-life and pro-family news. Sign up today!

Stay up-to-date on the issues you care about the most.

Select Your Edition:

Finished reading? Want to make an impact?

Your donation today helps bring the truth to MILLIONS.