You’re invited! Join LifeSite in celebrating 25 years of pro-life and pro-family reporting at our anniversary Gala August 17th in Naples, Florida. Tickets and sponsorships can be purchased by clicking here.
BATH, England (LifeSiteNews) – An American pathologist says that the potential side effects from the COVID jab were like a “nuclear bomb,” due to the “platform of lipid nanoparticle” technology that “has never been proven before.”
Dr. Ryan Cole sat down with Bright Light News during the World Council for Health Better Way Conference on June 4 and gave his medical opinion on the dangers that he has witnessed in the wake of the COVID jab rollout.
“Everybody hears about myocarditis,” he said. “What they don’t hear is that a lipid nanoparticle plus a modified gene sequence is a nuclear bomb.”
“It’s not just that this COVID shot is dangerous for people, it’s this platform of lipid nanoparticle plus gene sequence that has never been proven before.”
Cole likened the lipid nanoparticle platform to “garlic, once you stick it in the arm it goes anywhere in the body.” Because of this, “it can damage the brain,” he added.
According to Cole, lipid nanoparticles “were originally designed to take chemotherapy or potential gene agents to the brain.”
“Where do you not want a toxin replicating itself?” he asked. “In your brain.”
READ: European data suggests COVID jabs may be fatal for one in every 4,000 doses
Cole said that this has led to “immune suppression,” which he said is evidenced by an increase in “cancer rates because of that immune suppression.”
The WHO Pandemic Treaty looks set to be one of the biggest power-grabs in living memory, with unelected globalists seeking the power to declare pandemics, and then control your country's response.
But it's not too late to do something about it.
SIGN and SHARE this special petition telling Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus that the WHO will never usurp your nation's sovereignty.
The past two years have been rife with infringements on personal liberties and civil rights by national governments, but now the World Health Organization is seeking to appropriate those same abusive powers to itself at a global level.
194 member states representing 99% of the world's population are expected to sign pandemic treaties with the WHO that would allow Tedros, or any future Director General, to dictate exactly how your nation would respond to a new disease outbreak which they consider a pandemic.
This attack on national sovereignty will come as no surprise to those who for years have listened to elites like Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates discussing their vision for the centralization of power into globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), the WHO and the rest of the United Nations.
SIGN this petition against the WHO's Pandemic Treaty, before it's too late.
Ludicrously, 20 world leaders calling for the treaty, including Tedros, Boris Johnson and Emmanuel Macron, compared the post-Covid world to the post-WWII period, saying similar co-operation is now needed to "dispel the temptations of isolationism and nationalism, and to address the challenges that could only be achieved together in the spirit of solidarity and co-operation - namely peace, prosperity, health and security."
Australian PM Scott Morrison is the latest leader to express support for a “pandemic treaty”.
The stated intention of the WHO is to “kickstart a global process to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.”
The wheels are already in motion, with the Biden administration officially proposing the initial steps towards handing global pandemic control to the WHO.
Biden's representatives have submitted amendments to the WHO's International Health Regulations (IHR), which would give the Director General the right to declare health emergencies in any nation, even when disputed by the country in question.
These amendments, which would be legally binding under international law, will be voted on by the World Health Assembly (the governing body of the WHO) at a special convention running from May 22-28 and set the stage for a fully-fledged pandemic treaty to be passed.
SIGN and SHARE the petition telling the WHO that you won't accept any pandemic treaty
The ball has been rolling since the last World Health Assembly meeting in December, where the United States launched negotiations "on a new international health instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response," a U.S. statement read.
"This momentous step represents our collective responsibility to work together to advance health security and to make the global health system stronger and more responsive.
"We look forward to broad and deep negotiations using a whole-of-society and whole-of-government approach that will strengthen the international legal framework for public health/pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response and enable us to address issues of equity, accountability, and multisectoral collaboration evident in the COVID-19 pandemic.
"We know it will take all of us working together across governments, private sector, philanthropy, academia, and civil society to make rapid progress towards a long-term solution for these complex problems," the U.S. statement added.
SIGN the petition today to show the WHO that you won't accept this attack on national sovereignty.
These are precarious times in which freedom and self-determination must be defended from those who would ride rough-shod over your civil rights.
We do not want to go back to global lockdowns, vaccine mandates and propoganda.
Sign the petition - speak up now!
For More Information:
Biden hands over American sovereignty with proposed WHO treaty - LifeSiteNews
Pandemic Treaty is a backdoor to global governance - LifeSiteNews
Dr. Robert Malone on the WHO's power-grab - LifeSiteNews
**Photo: YouTube Screenshot**
“We’re seeing deaths from this shot at a rate higher than any medical product ever used on humanity before,” he stated. He called the COVID shot rollout “the largest experiment on humanity ever done, not knowing the long-term outcomes.”
Of particular concern to Cole is the spike protein mechanism of the mRNA shots, which has been linked to blood clots, heart and brain damage, and potential risks to nursing babies and fertility.
Cole also asserted that the jab is being used “for a virus that no longer exists.” By that he meant the “Wuhan” virus, the alleged original COVID variant.
“Wuhan is gone; omicron’s here,” he said. “The shots are now all risk, no benefit.”
In addition, he said, “vaccines… against coronaviruses never worked.”
READ: Conservative journalist challenges top World Health Organization, UN executives on COVID response
Cole is concerned about vaccine induced “permanent organ damage in people.” He is also worried about the damage the shot could cause children and women’s fertility.
“The children are putting this needle with this gene in their arm…,” Cole said.
“Wrong shot, wrong protein, wrong virus…,” he continued.
“We don’t even know where it’s going to land, [but] we do know it goes to their ovaries.”
“It was never safe in pregnancy,” he added. “You never use an experimental therapy modality on women until proven safe.”
“These [vaccines] were never safe in pregnancy, and never will be.”
Cole categorized the push to jab women and children – which he views as irresponsible – as “criminal acts that are being perpetrated upon humanity.”