CWA Claims Fake “Hate Crimes” Being Used to Force Legislation through Congress

By Peter J. Smith

  WASHINGTON, D. C., April 11, 2007 ( – Fake “hate crimes” are providing the impetus behind legislation pushed though Congress that would give homosexuals and their behavior special protections under US law and muzzle free speech protections of those who oppose homosexuality.

  According to Concerned Women for America (CWA), liberal lawmakers in the Democrat controlled Congress are poised to push the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act (H.R. 1592) - which would include “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” in current “hate crimes” legislation – despite the fact that homosexual activists may have fabricated an alarming percentage of the miniscule number of “hate crimes.”
  FBI statistics show nearly 1.4 million violent crimes were committed in 2005 of which just over 1,000 were reported as “hate crimes” directed against homosexuals or transvestites. Of this number, just one-third consisted of reports of “intimidation” or “hateful” words as opposed to violent acts.

  However, the homosexual lobby has trumpeted high-profile reports of alleged violence, which lacking substantial basis in fact, serve their agenda by creating a political atmosphere for liberal politicians to demand federal “hate crimes” legislation.

  Rep. John Conyer’s (D-Mich.) March 20th introduction of H.R. 1592 came in the wake of the high profile death of 72-year-old homosexual Andrew Anthos in Detroit. Homosexual activists asserted that in February an unidentified African-American man called Anthos a “faggot” and struck him in the back of the head with a metal pipe, ultimately killing him.

  Later investigators in Wayne County, Michigan, determined that this “hate crime” was in fact no “crime” at all - hateful or otherwise - but the result of an accidental fall brought on by severe arthritis in Anthos’ neck. Anthos had also been diagnosed with mental illness, and originally told police that he did not know how he was injured until he changed his story a week later to suggest that he was the victim of a “hate crime.”

  In another disturbing case of political deception, Alex McGillis, a homosexual Boise State University (BSU) student who told police in January an unidentified man beat him from behind with an object while shouting anti-“gay” epithets, later confessed that his “hate crime” was a hoax. He admitted to using a stick and his own fists to injure himself, but by that time student and administrative organizations around Boise State had sponsored the ‘No Oppression Tolerated, Not on Our Campus,’ rally and a candlelight vigil on the Quad.

  In perhaps the most famous “hate crime” case of Matthew Shephard, his murderers said their crime had nothing to do with Sheppard’s homosexual orientation, but concerned money for drugs. ABC News’ 20/20 admitted after an investigation that the attack had not been a hate crime but was in fact a bungled robbery. Nevertheless, the case generated over 13,500 "Mathew Shepard" news stories, massive TV coverage, two major Hollywood specials, three TV movies, and a play.
  Rather than prosecute all crimes equally as motivated by “hate”, H.R. 1592 would grant the federal government sweeping and entirely subjective authority to regulate the thoughts, words and actions of American citizens who could be accused of “hate crimes” by opposing the lifestyle of a special class of citizens.

  During an annual "gay pride" event known as "Outfest" in Philadelphia October 10, 2004, a number of Christians were arrested and charged with “hate crimes” for praying, singing, reading scripture, and handing out leaflets to homosexual attendees. The group faced three felony counts of criminal conspiracy, ethnic intimidation, and riot and five misdemeanor charges, which would have landed them 47 years in prison without the intervention of a Philadelphia judge who dismissed the charges in February.

  In Canada, homosexual activist MP Svend Robinson’s generated sympathy for his hate crimes bill C-250 by frequently referring to the US Shepard case. Robinson also heavily exploited the murder of a B.C. homosexual to motivate passage of the Canadian “hate” crimes change. In that case it was also eventually found that the Vancouver victim’s sexual orientation had nothing to do with his murder. The law passed in Sept. 2003. Subsequent revelations that the cases he exploited were in fact not “hate” crimes have not led to calls for the repeal of the “hate” crimes law change.

  Other incidents of recent “gay-bashing” hoaxes include one in 2005 in Mill Valley California where a high school activist faked a series of gay-bashing incidents at a high school that prompted a police investigation. The student who headed her school’s Gay-Straight Alliance admitted that she had herself been the perpetrator of the incidents, including vandalizing her own car with derogatory graffiti and making threatening phone calls to teachers.

  See related LifeSiteNews coverage:

  Prayer and Scripture Reading During Gay Celebration Could Cost Christians 47 Years in Prison 

  Judge drops ‘Hate Crimes’ Charge against ‘Philly 5’ for Preaching at Gay Festival

  Key French “Homophobic” Violence Case Dropped Long After Hate Crimes Law Installed

Share this article

Featured Image
Jonathon van Maren Jonathon van Maren Follow Jonathon


Please, enough with the cult of pop stars. Our kids need real heroes.

Jonathon van Maren Jonathon van Maren Follow Jonathon

April 29, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – Two things happen each time a significant pop culture figure dies: Christians attempt to dredge up some moderately conservative or traditional thing that figure said at some point during his long career, and mainstream media attempts to convince a society thoroughly bored with such things that the person in question was a ground-breaking radical. The two most recent examples are the androgynous David Bowie—a cringe-worthy and possibly blasphemous video of him dropping to his knees during a rock performance and uttering the Lord’s Prayer circulated just following his death--and the pop star Prince.

I’ve had to suppress my gag reflexes many times as I saw my Facebook newsfeed fill up with memes sporting quotes from Prince about his faith and articles announcing that the musician who “embraced gender fluidity before his time,” according to Slate and “will always be a gay icon” according to The Atlantic, was against gay marriage. Sure, maybe he was. But only a Christian community so shell-shocked by the rapid spread of the rainbow blitzkrieg and the catastrophic erosion of religious liberty would find this remarkable. After all, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton said the same thing barely one election cycle ago. As one obituary celebrating Prince’s paradigm-smashing sexual performances written by Dodai Stewart put it:

Dig, if you will, a picture: The year is 1980. Many states still have sodomy laws. The radio is playing feel-good ear candy like Captain and Tennille and KC and the Sunshine Band. TV hits include the sunny, toothy blond shows Three’s Company and Happy Days. There’s no real word for “gender non-conforming.” But here’s what you see: A man. Clearly a man. Hairy, mostly naked body…a satiny bikini bottom. But those eyes. Rimmed in black, like a fantasy belly dancer. The full, pouty lips of a pin-up girl. Long hair. A tiny, svelte thing. Ethnically ambiguous, radiating lust. What is this? A man. Clearly a man. No. Not just a man. A Prince.

Right. So let’s not get too carried away, shall we? I know Christians are desperate to justify their addictions to the pop culture trash that did so much to sweep away Christian values in the first place and I know that latching on to the occasional stray conservative belief that may manifest itself in pop culture figures makes many feel as if perhaps we are not so weird and countercultural, but this bad habit we have of claiming these figures upon their passing is downright damaging.

After all, parents should be teaching their children about real heroes, titans of the faith who changed the world. Heroes of the early church who stood down tyrants, halted gladiatorial combat, and crusaded against injustice in a world where death was all the rage. These men and women were real rebels who stood for real values. If we want to point our children to people they should emulate, we should be handing them books like Seven Men: And the Secret of Their Greatness by the brilliant writer Eric Metaxas rather than the pop albums Purple Rain or Lovesexy by Prince. If parents spend their time glorifying the predecessors of Lady Gaga and Miley Cyrus instead of highlighting heroes like William Wilberforce, they can hardly be surprised when their children choose to emulate the former rather than the latter.

The mainstream media’s adulation of these pop stars is equally irritating. The unspoken truth of these obituaries is that the flamboyant antics of Prince and the rest of the so-called rebellious drag queens populating the rock n’ roll scene have been mainstream for a long time already. Want to see dozens of bizarre body piercings? Weird hairdos? Purple mohawks? Dudes with nail polish? Strange tattoos? Easy. Just go onto any university campus, or any public high school without a dress code. With headphones wedged firmly in their ear canals, they can pump the cleverly commercialized “counterculture” straight into their skulls 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

More than that, some of these courageous rebels have actually sued their employers to ensure that they can let their establishment-smashing freak flag fly at work, too. An Edmonton woman with 22 visible body piercings complained that her employer was unfair because apparently she was being discriminated against “based on body modifications.” Yeah! The Man must be told, after all. And if he doesn’t agree, we will lawyer up. I wonder what the shrieking rebels of the early days would think about the snivelling children of the current grievance culture.

So these days, the media’s eulogizing about aging culture warriors who went mainstream a long time ago rings a bit hollow. After all, most rock n’ roll stars these days look tame compared to what shows up in the children’s section at Pride Week. Freaky is normal now. Normal is radical. Welcome to 2016.

When Christians are posting nostalgic tributes to the rebels who helped inoculate their children against the radical views of Christianity in the first place, you know that the victories of the counterculture are complete and Stockholm syndrome has set in.

Share this article

Featured Image
Paul McKinnon /
Claire Chretien Claire Chretien


Target boycott climbs to over 1 million

Claire Chretien Claire Chretien

April 29, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – Over 1 million people have signed a pledge to boycott Target over its new policy allowing men to access women’s bathrooms. 

The American Family Association’s Boycott Target petition gained traction immediately, reaching the one million mark in only nine days.

“Corporate America must stop bullying people who disagree with the radical left agenda to remake society into their progressive image,” said AFA President Tim Wildmon. “#BoycottTarget has resonated with Americans.  Target’s harmful policy poses a danger to women and children; nearly everyone has a mother, wife, daughter or friend who is put in jeopardy by this policy.  Predators and voyeurs would take advantage of the policy to prey on those who are vulnerable.  And it’s clear now that over one million customers agree.”

Target defended its policy in a statement saying that it believes everyone “deserves to be protected from discrimination, and treated equally” and earlier this week, a Target spokeswoman defended the policy as “inclusive.” 

The AFA said that unisex bathrooms are a common-sense alternative to allowing men unfettered access to women’s bathrooms.

“Target should keep separate facilities for men and women, but for the trans community and for those who simply like using the bathroom alone, a single occupancy unisex option should be provided,” the petition says. 

The AFA warned that Target’s new policy benefits sexual predators and poses a danger to women and children. 

“With Target publicly boasting that men can enter women's bathrooms, where do you think predators are going to go?” the petition asked. 

There have been numerous instances of predatory men accessing women’s bathrooms and intimate facilities in the wake of “transgender” bathroom policies allowing them to do so. 

“We want to make it very clear that AFA does not believe the transgender community poses this danger to the wider public,” said Wildmon. “Rather, this misguided and reckless policy provides a possible gateway for predators who are out there.”

Share this article

Featured Image
Ben Johnson Ben Johnson Follow Ben


Amazing new video captures the flash of light the moment life begins

Ben Johnson Ben Johnson Follow Ben

CHICAGO, April 29, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – Life begins with a spark – literally.

Researchers at Northwestern University have documented the striking event in a new video that accompanies a study published this week.

At the moment of conception, the egg releases massive amounts of zinc, which creates a spark that can be seen with the aid of a microscope.

“It was remarkable,” said Teresa Woodruff, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Northwestern University's medical school. “To see the zinc radiate out in a burst from each human egg was breathtaking.”

The research team had noted the zinc sparks before in mice eggs but had never observed the process in human beings.

“All of biology starts at the time of fertilization,” Woodruff said, “yet we know next to nothing about the events that occur in the human.”

One of the researchers, Northwestern chemistry professor Thomas O'Halloran, explained the science behind the process in 2014.

“The egg first has to stockpile zinc and then must release some of the zinc to successfully navigate maturation, fertilization and the start of embryogenesis,” he said. “On cue, at the time of fertilization, we see the egg release thousands of packages, each dumping a million zinc atoms, and then it's quiet.”

“Each egg has four or five of these periodic sparks,” O'Halloran said. “It is beautiful to see, orchestrated much like a symphony.”

Since the amount of zinc in an egg correlates with successful implantation and birth, the Northwestern researchers are highlighting that their research may be used to assist in vitro fertilization.

But that raises concerns given the grave moral issues with IVF, which involves creating numerous embryos that are either killed or frozen. Moral theologians also emphasize that IVF is an injustice even for the children who are born as a result, as they are created in a lab rather than in the union of man and woman.

The study may have far-reaching consequences the research team did not intend, such as strengthening public belief in the longstanding scientific consensus that life begins at the moment of conception/fertilization.

Many of those who saw the Northwestern video said it testifies to the beauty of life and the shallow lies that buttress the argument of abortion-on-demand.

“I saw this, and I was blown away by it,” said Rush Limbaugh on his nationally syndicated radio program Thursday afternoon. “For anybody in the mainstream media to openly admit that life begins at conception” defies arguments that an unborn child is only “tissue mass.”

Researchers released a separate video of the zinc spark taking place in a mammalian egg more than a year ago:

The paper, which is entitled “The Zinc Spark is an Inorganic Signature of Human Egg Activation,” was published by Scientific Reports on April 26.


Customize your experience.

Login with Facebook