News
Featured Image
 Claire Chretien / LifeSiteNews

WASHINGTON, D.C., July 18, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) – After a U.S. House Committee voted to invalidate Washington, D.C.'s legalization of assisted suicide, the district's mayor Muriel Bowser announced the law would immediately go into effect.

On July 17, the Bowser administration announced it was implementing the law and that the D.C. department of health would begin overseeing the doctor-prescribed death program. Bowser self-identifies as a Catholic.

On July 13, the House Appropriations Committee advanced a measure overturning the law 28-24. Congress may repeal local D.C. laws 30 days after they're passed. Because it's been much longer than that, Rep. Andy Harris, R-MD, proposed an amendment to a budget bill that would nulify the D.C. assisted suicide law.

After the committee accepted the amendment, the pro-assisted suicide group Compassion & Choices sent out a panicked email to supporters.

“Lawmakers did not just vote to block funding for the D.C. Death with Dignity Act that authorizes medical aid in dying for district residents. They voted to invalidate the law altogether,” wrote Charmaine Manansala. “If this outrageous power grab succeeds, it will inspire opponents of medical aid in dying to seek a nationwide ban on medical aid in dying.”

“Medical aid in dying” and “death with dignity” are euphemisms for assisted suicide and sometimes euthanasia. 

“Our opponents succeeded in amending the appropriations bill to stop Washington, D.C. from participating in medical aid in dying,” Compassion & Choices' Manansala wrote on July 14.

The D.C. government's Department of Health website now has a page devoted to educating people on their “right” to obtain lethal drugs with which to commit suicide.

The page directly links to Compassion & Choices. 

Image
The D.C. Department of Health's website links to assisted suicide advocacy group Compassion & Choices.

A “Frequently Asked Questions” sheet from the government assures people that they don't have to kill themselves at home or at a doctor's office. It can be done “any other location where the patient has permission to take the end of life medication.” However, “the patient’s estate will be responsible for any costs incurred by the District associated with taking the end of life medication in a public location,” it warns.

If the U.S. House and U.S. Senate pass the bill with Harris' amendment intact, and President Trump signs it, then it will still be a victory for life. Until then, the nation's capital is considering it “care” for doctors to help end their patients' lives.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.