News
Featured Image
 Shutterstock.com

SALEM, Oregon (LifeSiteNews) – The state of Oregon just dropped its residency requirement for assisted suicide, allowing non-Oregonians to come to the Beaver State to end their lives.

On March 28, the state agreed to stop enforcing its current residency requirement after a federal lawsuit was filed. The Oregon Health Authority has also declared it will draft a bill to repeal the requirement altogether.

The lawsuit was filed by Compassion & Choices, an assisted suicide lobby group. The group represented Nicholas Gideonse, a doctor in Oregon who wished to prescribe lethal drugs for people in neighboring Washington state.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Oppose taxpayer-funded abortion #SaveHyde
  Show Petition Text
43750 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 45000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The Hyde Amendment prohibits the use of most federal funds for abortions, except in some limited circumstances.

But, with the Democrats in charge of the Congress and the presidency, the Hyde Amendment is now under severe attack.

That's why 200 Republican Congressmen vowed in a letter addressed to U.S. House and Senate leadership their "unified opposition to Congressional Democrats’ efforts to repeal the Hyde Amendment and other current-law, pro-life appropriations provisions."

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition to signal your support of the effort to keep the Hyde Amendment firmly in place, and prevent our federal tax dollars from funding abortion.

After signing the petition, please take a few minutes to quickly and easily contact your congressmen to politely voice your opposition to the repeal of the Hyde Amendment. Simply click on the link in the 'For More Information' section below, and follow the directions.

No-one should be forced to pay for any abortion, ever, against their will. Forcing taxpayers to pay for abortion would be a gross violation of freedom of conscience, and should be vigorously resisted.

Although President Joe Biden was originally in favor of the Hyde Amendment, even as recently as 2019, he has dramatically altered his position to align with the Democratic Party platform, which has promised to repeal the amendment throughout the 2020 presidential campaign and, indeed, since taking the presidency.

The Democrats officially support unlimited abortion on demand, funded by taxpayers. Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris marked the anniversary of Roe v. Wade by pledging to make abortion available to "everyone."

But, Americans overwhelmingly disagree with this proposed policy change. A 2019 Politico/Morning Consult poll found that 49% of Americans agree with the Hyde Amendment, while only 33% oppose it.

Regardless of polls, though, abortion is always and everywhere wrong.

Abortion is not necessary medical treatment, it is the deliberate destruction of unborn human life at its most vulnerable stage. Forcing taxpayers to pay for abortion would be unconscionable.

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition, telling Congressmen of both political parties, to supports efforts to keep the Hyde Amendment in all federal budgets.

Thank you!

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Please CLICK HERE to CONTACT your congressmen. It only takes a couple of minutes and the platform is very user-friendly. Thank you!

'200 GOP congressmen slam Democrats, say they’ll never vote for tax-funded abortions' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/200-gop-congressmen-slam-democrats-say-theyll-never-vote-for-tax-funded-abortions

2019 Poll on the Hyde Amendment - https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/11/poll-abortion-funding-reversal-helps-biden-with-primary-voters-1359210

**Photo Credit: Shutterstock

  Hide Petition Text

The lawsuit argued that the residency requirement violated a clause of Oregon’s constitution which states, “the citizens of each state shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states.”

Oregon Right to Life sharply criticized the agreement as an attempt to bypass court adjudication of the constitutionality of the current laws. They said it would usher in “death tourism” in Oregon.

“We already have a problem with dangerously short physician-patient relationships and the push to eliminate any waiting period for life-ending drugs. We should not be expanding access to lethal prescriptions,” said Oregon Right to Life Executive Director Lois Anderson.

Oregon was the first state to allow assisted suicide in 1997. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the law in 2006. According to the 2021 data summary of the Oregon Death with Dignity Act, to date 3,280 people have received lethal prescriptions under the law, of which two-thirds – 2,159 people – died from the medications. Ten other U.S. states or jurisdictions currently allow assisted suicide, all of which have residency requirements.

Pro-lifers maintain that suffering cannot be treated by killing the sufferer, and have long warned that legalized assisted suicide can easily be abused.

“Depression is the most common factor in requests for assisted suicide,” notes the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition. “Depression can be diagnosed and treated successfully. Requests for assisted suicide [are] a call for help.”

In the 1995 Encyclical Evangelium Vitae, Pope John Paul II emphasized the need to legally protect human life in its final stages. Citing the Declaration on Euthanasia, Iura et Bona, of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, he summarized the pro-life position, “‘Nothing and no one can in any way permit the killing of an innocent human being, whether a fetus or an embryo, an infant or an adult, an old person, or one suffering from an incurable disease, or a person who is dying. Furthermore, no one is permitted to ask for this act of killing, either for himself or herself or for another person entrusted to his or her care, nor can he or she consent to it, either explicitly or implicitly. Nor can any authority legitimately recommend or permit such an action.’”

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

2 Comments

    Loading...