By Hilary White

  LONDON, July 2, 2008 ( – Abortion on demand, without even the token restriction of two doctors’ signatures, and abortions committed by nurses and midwives; these are the proposed amendments made in Parliament to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology bill, a piece of legislation that already allows the use of human beings for experimentation and the creation of human/animal hybrid clones.

  Britain’s All Party Parliamentary Pro-Life Group has issued a letter asking pro-life supporters to contact their MPs to ask them to defeat the pro-abortion amendments being proposed for the bill. They are also urging people to ask for the legislation to be defeated as a whole.

  Signed by MPs Jim Dobbin and Ann Widdecomb, and Lord David Alton, the letter said, “People have to be made to understand that the bill, which is dreadful as it stands can be made even more horrendous by amendments at the Report Stage.”

  The letter also asks for support for a pro-life amendment that would require scientists to show that there are no alternatives to research requiring the creation of hybrid clones and another that would mandate that women receive information about abortion for “informed consent”.

  While encouraging the pro-life amendments to lessen the bill’s damage, the letter says the bill itself is ultimately unsupportable. “We urge people to contact their MPs to vote against it and state that they will bear MPs voting records in mind at the next general election.”

  Read related coverage:
  UK Reproductive Tech Bill Allows Much More Than Human/Animal Hybrids

  Britain’s Labour Party to Force MP’s to Support Embryology Bill

  Three Catholic Labour Cabinet Ministers to Revolt on Embryo Bill

  UK Bill Allows Human Animal Hybrid Embryos


Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.