News
Featured Image
Rebecca Billiard Screenshot/CBC

MONCTON, Canada (LifeSiteNews) — A woman in Canada is being denied treatment for her opioid addiction because she has refused to undergo “invasive” birth control methods. 

According to an investigative report by CBC News, Rebecca Billiard, 32, was told she may not continue her treatments with Sublocade, a drug that helps manage severe withdrawal symptoms, unless she first agrees to one of a limited selection of birth control options, including a hormonal implant or intrauterine device (IUD), or permanent sterilization. 

Given in a monthly injection, Sublocade – a trademarked name for buprenorphine –   provides more convenient and long-lasting relief from symptoms than many typical pharmaceutical options given during more frequent pharmacy visits. 

Billiard said in an interview with the outlet that the lack of “routine or ritual to take a daily medication” helps recipients to “almost forget about the compulsion of the addiction.” 

“It gives you more time to think about things you can do to improve your outlook and your happiness and your routine to get back into the swing of things,” she added. 

However, Billiard’s physician has told her she may not continue taking the crucial treatment unless she submits to an “invasive” form of contraception. 

 

Approved by Health Canada in 2018, Sublocade, like many pharmaceutical drugs, is considered to pose a risk to an unborn baby if the drug is taken during pregnancy.  

According to the product monograph, “Sublocade use should be avoided in women of childbearing potential who are not using an effective and reliable method of contraception or are judged not able to comply with contraceptive methods.” 

Billiard, however, is not pregnant or in a sexual relationship with a man, and Sublocade’s manufacturer told CBC news the company “does not recommend or stipulate a specific method or recommendation for contraception.” 

Nevertheless Billiard’s physician Dr. Frank Lord told her she would need to be on “effective and reliable contraception” to get her second dose of Sublocade, adding that the options were “quite limited.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Ban Critical Race Theory in public schools
  Show Petition Text
9787 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 10000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The dangerous ideas of Critical Race Theory (CRT) are being forced on students in public schools around the country.

This is wrong and parents have had enough! It's time to join them in saying "STOP!" to this harmful and racist propaganda.

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition which says "No to CRT" in public schools, and "Yes to parents' right" to strongly protest CRT.

But, what is CRT anyway and why is it so dangerous?

Critical Race Theory is a hateful system of indoctrination which teaches that one race is either superior or inferior to another race, and that the United States is inherently racist.

CRT is dangerous and hateful precisely because it teaches children who are not white to despise and envy white children simply because of their skin color. And, as a result, it also teaches white children to despise themselves simply because of the color of their skin.

CRT also erroneously teaches that American society is inherently racist, and that different, detrimental policies (like reparations for slavery and race-based pay scales) should be imposed on the population to redistribute wealth from whites to non-whites.

This type of racist/marxist propaganda should have NO place in public, taxpayer-funded schools!

And, thankfully, American parents of EVERY COLOR are raising their voices and ballots against it!

Indeed, parents understand the destructive ramifications of CRT and, despite outrageous threats from Biden's Justice Department to prosecute them, they have been strongly protesting CRT at school board meetings across the country!

And now, in the first test of its kind, a candidate who was campaigning hard against CRT just won the governorship of Virginia in a huge upset victory.

That's great news, but we now need to contact every state legislature about this crucial educational issue.

And, we need to DEMAND that they BAN Critical Race Theory from every public school in their states - both primary and high schools, and colleges!

Whereas advocates of CRT seem more intent on vengence than on teaching children of every race to respect everybody, regardless of skin color, American parents of every race understand that it is not the color of one's skin that matters, but the content of one's character (to paraphrase Martin Luther King, Jr.).

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition asking all state legislatures to BAN Crititical Race Theory from public schools in their respective states.

Thank you!

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

'States are fighting the Left over the morally bankrupt critical race theory' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/states-are-fighting-the-left-over-the-morally-bankrupt-critical-race-theory/

'Parents who oppose Critical Race Theory in schools could be prosecuted by FBI' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/attorney-general-tasks-fbi-to-move-against-parents-protesting-leftist-agenda-in-schools/

Ohio parents testify: Yes, critical race theory is in our schools, and we say NO! - https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/ohio-parents-testify-yes-critical-race-theory-is-in-our-schools-and-we-say-no

An excellent Heritage Foundation document on CRT: Critical Race Theory Would Not Solve Racial Inequality: It Would Deepen It

**Photo Credit: EJ Nickerson / Shutterstock.com

  Hide Petition Text

In a recording obtained by CBC news, Billiard’s physician Dr. Frank Lord suggested Billiard could only continue treatment if she agreed to undergo a hysterectomy, tubal ligation, or one of only two options for “reversible contraception… hormonal implant or an IUD, intrauterine device.” 

“As far as I know, you do not fit those criteria right now,” Lord said. “So with the current guidelines and very new information, Sublocade is not an option for you anymore. So the way to proceed at this time will be to ensure you can meet those criteria for contraception or we’ll have to switch you over to Suboxone again, or maybe another suggestion.” 

Making a medical treatment contingent upon invasive contraceptives or total sterilization has caused outrage among many who argue that invasive birth control should not be a prerequisite to receive potentially life-saving treatments. 

CBC former news director Treena Wood called the matter “egregious.” 

“This woman’s doctor basically told her to get a tubal ligation or be cut off her buprenorphine injection,” commented Reuters reporter Anna Mehler Paperny. 

 

 

The issue has also raised questions about freedom and bodily autonomy within a democratic society, in which all women theoretically have the freedom to decide not to take birth control or undergo sterilization. In Communist China, forcing artificial birth control and abortions upon certain women is typical.  

According to the Associated Press, “The state regularly subjects minority women to pregnancy checks, and forces intrauterine devices, sterilization and even abortion on hundreds of thousands.” 

“God bequeaths children on you,” said Gulnar Omirzakh, a Chinese-born Kazakh woman who was fined thousands of dollars for having more than two children. “To prevent people from having children is wrong.” 

In her interview with CBC, Billiard said she feels she must submit to some form of invasive birth control device or treatment to continue her opioid treatment, arguing that “it’s my life that is on the line.” 

According to the outlet, “[a]s time runs out before her next injection is due,” Billiard is hoping to “see doctors be more understanding that each person they treat is different.” 

“I do feel that I haven’t been heard and that I haven’t been trusted with my own reproductive health here and my own choice to choose what medications work best for me and my situation,” Billiard said.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

12 Comments

    Loading...