Featured Image
 Ricky Of The World/Shutterstock

(LifeSiteNews) – The CEO of the popular alternative search engine DuckDuckGo, which prides itself as a privacy-centric alternative to Google, has said that despite claims from some, there will not be any “purging” of independent media from its search results 

Hoping to clear up some misconceptions about our private search engine. First, there is a completely made up headline going around this weekend. We are not purging any media outlets from results. Anyone can verify this by searching for an outlet and see it come up in results,” tweeted DuckDuckGo CEO Gabriel Weinberg on April 17.  

The statement from Weinberg comes after News Punch claimed in a March 11 report that DuckDuckGo would be clearing its site of independent media.   

Wrote News Punch, DuckDuckGo CEO Gabriel Weinberg has announced that the search engine will begin purging all independent media outlets from the platform and will replace them with trusted mainstream media outlets instead. 

Weinberg stated today on Twitter that the News Punch report is “completely false.” 

“To clear up any confusion, the ‘made up headline’ referenced in the first tweet of this thread was referring to a newspunch headline claiming we were ‘purging all independent media outlets from the platform.’ As stated above, that is completely false,” tweeted Weinberg.  

Weinberg wrote on April 17 that DuckDuck Go “is not ‘purging’ YouTube-dl or The Pirate Bay and they both have actually been continuously available in our results if you search for them by name (which most people do). Our site: operator (which hardly anyone uses) is having issues which we are looking into.” 

Weinberg clarified that DuckDuckGo is “not and have never been owned by Google, and we also don’t rely on Google’s results for any of our search results.” 

“We have been an independent company since our founding in 2008,” added Weinberg.  

He also said that DuckDuckGo does not “track our users so don’t have any search histories and therefore cannot alter results based on search history.” 

“This is different from ‘unfiltered’ because every search engine’s job is to filter millions of possible results down to a ranked order of just a handful,” noted Weinberg.  

Weinberg then said that “Search ranking and censorship are entirely different things.” 

We make our results useful by ranking spam lower. We are not ranking based on any political agenda or my (or anyone else’s) personal political opinions. We are also not assessing any individual news stories,” he added.  

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION CONGRESS: Ban all males from female sports
  Show Petition Text
8524 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 9000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The entire country has seen what happens when men enter women's sports.

Lia Thomas is a biological male, but he was nonetheless allowed swim against elite female competitors to win an NCAA Freestyle competition, much to the disappointment of those women who had trained so hard to compete.


Males have a natural advantage over females in the vast majority of sports, so allowing them to enter women's sports can:

  • crush the motivation of the biological girls who have worked hard to compete on a level playing field
  • put females into harm's way in contact sports and locker rooms
  • deprive women of their right to fairly compete for college scholarships and many other accolades

We all know the spectacle of Lia Thomas defeating those female swimmers was a charade, a mockery of women's sports, but now it's time to do something about it.

Please SIGN this urgent petition calling on members of Congress to pass a law banning the participation of biological males in women's sports.

This is not just about ensuring biological girls and women can compete fairly and win in their chosen sports, but it's also a major safety issue in contact sports and the dangerous use of women's locker rooms by gender-confused males.

Some of you will remember Fallon Fox, the male MMA fighter who claimed to be a woman and left his female opponent concussed and with a fractured skull.

Fox later announced on social media that he enjoys "smacking up" women who "talk transphobic nonsense."

Any reasonable person knows men shouldn't compete against women, but some people are too politically correct to take a stand and protect girls and women from this madness.

It's now time to join the growing pushback against the gender-confused lobby and their dangerous beliefs that have literally left some female competitors in the hospital.

Please SIGN this common sense petition calling on Congress to ban all males from competing in women's sport.

Future generations will look back with gratitude on those who stood on the right side of history, defending women from these very confused males.

Nothing less than a federal ban on biological males forcing their way into women's sport is enough, so this petition will be sent to all members of Congress demanding legislative action.


'Olympians, coaches, swimmers write open letter demanding NCAA protect women’s sports' -

'Female swimmer torches NCAA after losing spot to William ‘Lia’ Thomas: ‘Make the right changes’' -

'Rep. Boebert files resolution declaring female runner-up to ‘Lia’ Thomas the rightful winner' -

**Photo Credit: Fox News/YouTube screenshot

  Hide Petition Text

In March, DuckDuckGo caused many to question whether it would continue to be billed as a neutral search engine after it announced it would “downrank” websites connected to Russian disinformation in its search results. 

About this, on April 17, Weinberg said that “Unlike independent media, Russian state-sponsored media is highly censored and violations are punishable by jail time or worse.” 

“This makes it inherently more spammy relative to independent media. The same is true for all censored media,” added Weinberg.  

DuckDuckGo was launched in 2008 and quickly became popular as an alternative to Google, Apple, and Microsoft-based search engines which have been known to manipulate search results. 

An example of search manipulation is the information war that took place, and is still underway, regarding COVID-19, in particular with regard to the COVID jabs.  

Mainstream tech companies Google and Microsoft and social media giants Twitter and Facebook in March, 2020, billed themselves as the sole judges of what is deemed to be “authoritative content” regarding COVID-19 in a joint statement they released.  


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.