News

By Peter J. Smith

SACRAMENTO, California, April 13, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Homosexual activists eager to repeal California’s ban on same-sex “marriage” have admitted defeat for this year, as they could not gather enough signatures from Californians who share their enthusiasm to put their initiative on the November ballot.

Supporters for same-sex “marriage” gathered under the banner of Restore Equality 2010 were determined to repeal Proposition 8, a state constitutional amendment approved by Californians in 2008 defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman. 

The group said they missed the state’s Monday filing deadline, because they did not have the requisite 695,000 signatures to put the measure on the ballot. They did not reveal by how much their effort had failed. 

“Our signature collection effort may have fallen short, but we stand tall as being the only statewide campaign that fought for repealing Proposition 8 in 2010,” said Sean Bohac, Chairman of the Restore Equality 2010, in a statement reported by the Sacramento Bee.

Restore Equality 2010 originally formed as an offshoot of Equality California, one of the largest homosexualist organizations in California, over a strategic disagreement on when to press for a repeal. Equality California wanted to wait until 2012 to mount a challenge to Prop. 8 at the ballot box, arguing they would have more time to prepare and a better advantage with younger voters in a presidential election.

Restore Equality says they instead will now return to the original plan, and coordinate with other same-sex “marriage” proponents to overturn Prop. 8 in 2012.

The Sacramento Bee reports that the pro-family National Organization for Marriage believes that Californians have already decided on the issue, and are unlikely to want to decide the question again.

“Efforts to repeal Prop 8 failed because the majority of Californians do not want to revisit this issue,” said Brian Brown, NOM’s Executive Director. “Even the minority of Californians who voted against Prop 8 have accepted that the majority rules and moved on to other issues.”

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.