News

WASHINGTON, January 29, 2004 (LifeSiteNews.com/c-fam.org) – The Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute reported today in its Friday fax that the US Congress has voted to permanently reallocate $56 million in funding previously earmarked for the United Nations Population Fund.  The money represents the amount withheld from UNFPA for the past two years because of the UNFPA’s known participation in coercive abortions in China.  Under the U.S. Foreign Operations, Export Financing and Related Programs Appropriations Act, any organization which participates in coercive abortion precludes them from any financial support.

UNFPA and its closest ally, International Planned Parenthood Federation, are still claiming victory, because the budget still allocates 34 million new dollars for the agency.  But the money is available only with the condition that the UNFPA certify that it no longer participates in coercive abortions policies, which is the same course of action Congress has taken for the past two years.

In a conversation with C-FAM, a congressional staff member said that “since UNFPA’s actions in China have not changed, we fully expect the administration to take the same action it has taken for the past two years regarding UNFPA.”  C-FAM urges Americans to email the President at [email protected] and say “No funding for UNFPA. No money for coerced abortions.” He will listen.  https://www.c-fam.org/

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.