News
Featured Image
 Shutterstock.com

BRUSSELS (LifeSiteNews)—In a statement to the mainstream news agency Reuters, the European Commission (EC) has warned EU countries against unilaterally rolling out additional boosters for the COVID experimental “vaccines.”  

The EC holds that there is not enough information available about potential risks linked to giving patients a third dose, as many European countries are already planning to do. 

An extra booster shot is being touted in many countries as capable of substantially raising the immunity of the vaccinated, even against new variants, now that it has become abundantly clear that so-called “fully vaccinated” people are not at all fully protected from contamination and can also spread the coronavirus responsible for COVID-19. 

The European Medicines Agency is at present not prepared to authorize the “third shot,” which means that countries that recommend giving an extra shot to so-called “fully vaccinated” people must face the consequences alone if any problems should arise. 

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Ban COVID vaccine mandates for schools and universities!
  Show Petition Text
39758 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 40000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

With the FDA's decision to officially approve the Pfizer COVID jab, calls to vaccinate schoolchildren and more university students will become louder and more insistent.

But, America's children and young people must be protected from unknown future side-effects of these drugs, and parents' rights must be respected!

Please SIGN this urgent petition which demands that COVID vaccine mandates for schools and universities be prohibited in every U.S. state.

This petition will be sent to the leaders of every state legislature and to every governor in the United States, urging them to pass emergency legislation banning vaccine mandates for primary, secondary and university students.

Students simply have the right to be educated without being forced to violate deeply held principles and their own bodily integrity!

But, unfortunately, some private schools, like the Jesuit-run Brophy College Prep School in Phoenix, Arizona, have already mandated the COVID vaccine for their students, in spite of massive parental opposition. If parents or students reject the vaccine, students face intrusive weekly testing and exclusion from extra-curricular activities.

Also, more and more universities have actually started to disenroll unvaccinated students. But, even where that is not happening, not taking the vaccine often subjects students to masking, extra testing and additional administrative obstacles.

And now, with the Pfizer jab approval, Joe Biden's Surgeon General, Vivek Murthy, is threatening more mandates.

While it is true that the FDA approval for the Pfizer jab only pertains to those over 16 years of age, the pharmaceutical industry and some state actors have been pushing to get approval for pre-teens!

So, it stands to reason that the Federal government will try to impose vaccines on schools, for those 16 and over, as well as on all university students. But, eventually, such mandates could even apply to younger and younger schoolchildren.

That's why state legislatures and governors must fight back against any attempt to coerce school students to take a COVID vaccine against their will!

Science and logic should dictate public health policy. And both say that mandatory vaccination for children and university students is not only unnecessary, but very likely dangerous for the future health of America's youth.

The CDC reports that the rates of death, injury, and hospitalization are very, very low for children and adolescents and that COVID transmission in schools, both from student to staff and between students, is also very low.

And a European CDC study concluded that "no evidence has been found to suggest that children or educational settings are primary drivers of COVID transmission."

So, right now, we know that schoolchildren are at very low risk of becoming very ill as a result of COVID, or of even transmitting the virus.

But, we don't know how a hastily-prepared, unstudied vaccine will affect the health of millions of America's youth in the future.

Gambling with their future, and the future of our nation, should not even be entertained for one second!

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition urging state legislatures to ban COVID vaccine mandates for schools and universities - both public and private. Urge them to respect parents' rights, informed consent and bodily integrity.

Thank you!

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

'Ivy League schools mandate COVID-19 vaccines for fall' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/ivy-league-mandates-covid-19-vaccines-for-the-fall/

'FDA approval of Pfizer jab isn’t about our health, it’s about mandating the shots' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/fda-approval-of-pfizer-jab-isnt-about-our-health-its-about-mandating-the-shots

  Hide Petition Text

Reuters quoted the European Commission, the EU’s executive body, as having said: “Booster doses are currently not part of the marketing authorization of COVID-19 vaccines and have not yet been subject to a scientific assessment by EMA in the absence of sufficient data.” 

The Commission’s statement added that “the responsibility to decide to include boosters in their vaccination campaign remains with the Member States (…) As long as the booster doses are not part of the marketing authorization, companies’ liability is modified.” 

In other words, neither the EU nor Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, and AstraZeneca, the four labs that have gained exclusive approval for their “vaccines” on the territory of the EU, would be considered responsible for any adverse effect that would normally allow victims to seek compensation. 

At present, who takes what responsibility for adverse effects of the experimental Spike protein injections is not very clear. European Union rules apply when adverse effects are deemed to be “unexpected” and related either to the product’s general characteristics or to the way it was manufactured. Member countries are expected to manage compensation according to EU rules while the labs involved have negotiated specific clauses with the EU that remain confidential for the most part. 

The issue raised by the European Commission is that of “unexpected” adverse effects that would be proved to be linked to the administration of an extra booster shot. Such boosters are already being recommended by France, Austria, Belgium, Hungary, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, and Slovenia in order to counter – they say – dwindling “protection” as the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant continues to replace the coronavirus the approved “vaccines” were designed to combat. 

Germany and 13 other EU countries are also considering offering third doses to their “fragile” citizens – if not imposing them, for it appears more and more probable that the definition of “full vaccination” will be modified as regards sanitary passes now required in several EU countries for many daily activities. 

The Commission is in effect telling those who will go ahead with the third dose – as France intends to do with its elderly population as of September 13, as well as with patients with comorbidities – that governments themselves would likely be obliged to bear the brunt of any successful lawsuits linked to such serious side-effects. 

A non-EU country, Israel, has already started rolling out extra booster shots; the “third dose” campaign began for over-60’s over a month ago and has now been extended to all citizens aged 12 and over. This means that, in Israel, adolescents are now being pushed to get a third jab which even such a pro-vaccination body as the European Commission is warning against. 

The number of dead in Israel attributed daily to COVID has risen steadily since July 29, and “cases” are also continuing to rise, reaching levels that had not been attained since the beginning of the COVID crisis. The proportion of deaths is less high than previously, a fact that is officially being attributed to widespread vaccination, but in nearby Jordan, where the vaccination rate is twice as low, both “cases” and deaths remain extremely low. In Israel, there is even talk of forcing the population into a new lockdown. 

While the mainstream media are pushing for an extra booster shot, once more telling the population that it is the only way out of COVID restrictions and of “beating” the virus, alternative sites have long been warning the population against specific risks linked with taking a third dose of the mRNA shots (Pfizer and Moderna) or the adenoviral shots (AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson). 

Critics contend that the “live” Spike protein which is the basis of the four authorized jabs in the EU is in itself toxic and responsible for the disease developed by people who get a severe form of COVID. and that having it repeatedly be produced by tricking individuals’ cells into making it is putting them at increased risk of severe complications. 

Jean-Marc Sabatier, a director of research at the French national research center CNRS and a doctor in cellular biology and microbiology, believes that manufacturers should have been careful to ensure that the Spike proteins injected by the current “vaccines” were unable to fix themselves on receptors in the human body, thereby avoiding the possibility that the vaccinated would develop a disease similar to COVID, as is happening when they get blood-clot related adverse effects. 

He is against to giving people third, and (why not?) fourth jabs (as total immunity fails to be reached) because the present two-jab (or one, for Johnson & Johnson) vaccine process has  already given rise to incidents of antibody dependent enhancement, or ADE, by which the vaccinated are exposed to infection by the internalization of virus and antibody complexes. 

Sabatier warns that if extra boosters are delivered, the third and fourth shots would augment the risk of forming “facilitating” antibodies that would help the virus to prosper. 

Other respected scientists and medical scientists have repeatedly warned against getting third or fourth injections. They include Michael Yeadon and Sucharit Bhakdi who, as early as February 2021 in the debate about Spike protein injections, warned that blood-clot complications would arise and would become more numerous with booster shots. 

At present, adverse effect vigilance has already established that a number of thromboses and heart problems are linked with the reception of the existing COVID-19 “vaccines.” 

In France only, by August 19, 78,639 adverse effects had been registered by the National Agency for Drug Security for the four authorized COVID-19 “vaccines,” of which one quarter were considered “serious.” Under-reporting of complications is a known issue. Sociologist and CNRS researcher Laurent Mucchielli recently published a study according to which the global mortality linked with COVID “vaccines” in France has reached 3.7 deaths per 100.000 vaccinated individuals, that is about 1,000 deaths by July 2021.  

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.