News

STRASBOURG, January 23, 2002 (LSN.ca) – The European Court of Human Rights decided yesterday, not only to hear, but to give priority to the case of Dianne Pretty, a UK woman who has become the latest poster-child for euthanasia advocates. The European Court has also decided to “communicate the application to the United Kingdom Government as matter of urgency.” The decision has thrilled euthanasia activists who suggested the case could go to court within months. Last November, the UK House of Lords rejected an appeal by Pretty, a 47-year-old British woman suffering from motor neurone disease, who asked the courts to allow her husband to assist in her suicide without facing criminal charges. Five law lords unanimously dismissed the appeal, saying that human rights legislation, on which grounds Pretty appealed, was in place to protect life rather than end it. Pretty also lost her case in a unanimous ruling at the High Court.

Alex Schadenberg of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition told LifeSite, “The European court of human rights has to recognize the concerns of disabled people throughout all of Europe and how euthanasia and assisted suicide directly threaten their lives. The British courts ruled against Pretty’s request due to their concerns for all vulnerable people in Britain. We strongly object to anybody having the right to kill another person, even for reasons of supposed mercy.”

See the European Court of Human Rights release on the Pretty case:  https://www.echr.coe.int/Eng/Press/jan/Prettyepress.htm

See related LifeSite coverage:  BRITAIN’S TOP COURT REJECTS WOMAN’S APPEAL FOR ASSISTED SUICIDE https://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2001/nov/011129.html#2

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

0 Comments

    Loading...