By Hilary White

Bishop Patrick O'DonoghueLANCASTER, UK, August 19, 2008 ( – Roman Catholic Bishop Patrick O’Donoghue of the Lancaster diocese in northwest England, has heavily criticised his fellow bishops of England and Wales for what he sees as a weak, “flat” response to many of today’s moral crises, especially that of the radical homosexualist and anti-Catholic,  secularist lobby. has exclusively obtained a copy of a document that is due to be published next week, in which O’Donoghue calls on his fellow bishops to “rediscover” and fearlessly exercise their teaching authority in union with the Pope.

  In the densely packed 92-page document, “Fit for Mission? Church”,  Bishop O’Donoghue writes of the failure of the Catholic bishops of England and Wales forthrightly to face the issues of homosexual activism as a body. He especially emphasizes his “disappointment that our Bishops’ Conference recently could not agree on a collegial response to the Government’s legislation on same-sex adoption.”

“Attempting to arrive at a consensus among bishops with sometimes divergent views, Episcopal Conference statements and documents have a tendency to be often flat and ‘safe’ at a time when we need passionate and courageous public statements that dare to speak the full truth in love.”

“I must admit that during my 15 years as a bishop I have increasingly come to share certain concerns about the relationship between individual bishops and the National Conference.” Bishop O’Donoghue says he agrees with the warning of the 1985 Synod on the “necessity of limiting the authority of national Episcopal conferences.”

  The Bishop writes that the idea of dividing the areas of responsibility, such as education, liturgy and healthcare, among the bishops, has resulted in a “reluctance among the rest of the bishops to speak out on these issues.” He notes particularly that some bishops had reacted with “surprise” that he had dared to produce his own teaching document, “Fit for Mission? Schools”, earlier this year.

“The effort to achieve a consensus” he says, “results…often in the loss of the ‘scandal’ and the ‘folly’ of the Gospel, so that we are no longer the ‘salt’ and ‘leaven’ so urgently needed.”

“Confident, courageous and prophetic bishops [are] vital for the well-being of the Church during this time of increasingly aggressive secularism.”

  Citing the great 5th century bishop St. Augustine, Bishop O’Donoghue calls for bishops to “re-exercise their individual teaching charism.”  This rediscovery of the charism of bishops, he says, is needed to combat the loss of passion for Catholicism notable in many parishes and lay people.

“The passion to serve the Lord is noticeably absent in many cases –  there seems to be at times a tiredness and reticence to preach the gospel.” He says that in the course of the 16-month consultation in preparation for the document, he saw a “lack of confidence and knowledge of the Catholic faith.” He therefore calls for a revival of apologetics, the reasoned defence of Christianity, especially in the face of increasingly popular atheist polemics from writers such as Richard Dawkins.

  In the document, produced as Bishop O’Donoghue prepares to retire, he says that “Agencies and Commissions of national conferences” have failed to uphold the “fullness of the Church’s teaching”, particularly “doctrinal and moral teaching, in their collaboration with secular agencies.”

“I’m thinking in particular of agencies with a responsibility for education or economic development. The staff of these agencies are often in a position to witness to the truth of the Church’s teaching on, say, the theology of the body with its positive refutation of pre-marital sex, ‘safe sex’, or artificial birth control, in their dealings with government departments and committees.”

  Bishop O’Donoghue does not name names, but many have made similar criticisms of the English Catholic bishops’ overseas aid and development agency, CAFOD, that has insisted on promoting condoms as a means of controlling the spread of HIV/AIDS.

  In another case, at least one Catholic adoption agency has opted to abandon its association with the Catholic Church to adhere to the government’s requirement to adopt children to homosexual “partners.”  When the problem of the Sexual Orientation Regulations and the Catholic adoption agencies arose in the news last year, it was revealed that many agencies held the policy of allowing children to be adopted to single homosexuals, and this with at least the tacit blessing of the local bishop.

  Bishop O’Donoghue’s own suggestion for the Catholic social services agency was to have it adopt an uncompromisingly Catholic position and refuse to adopt to anyone who is not in a legal marriage. In the document he criticises the administrators of Church institutions,  saying, “There must be no back peddling on these issues just because certain truths are unwelcome in the corridors of power.”

“We have talked too much and done too little. We have witnessed over the past forty years a growing crisis in the Catholic understanding or self-identity of the Church…Have we forgotten what it is to be Catholic?”

  Hope for the future, he says, lies with the younger generation who are notably more interested in reviving the essentials of the Catholic religion. “The maturity of the Pope John Paul II generation will lead,  I hope, to a resurgence of orthodox, committed adults in the Church,  gradually renewing vocations to the priesthood, religious life and marriage.”

  News of the document was first publicized on Damian Thompson’s Daily Telegraph weblog, “Holy Smoke.”

  Daphne McLeod, a Catholic lay activist and head of the organisation Pro Ecclesia et Pontifice, who has been campaigning for years to restore the Catholic Church in Britain, said: “What he’s saying is what we’ve all been saying for years, but now it’s a bishop saying it. We can use it and quote it and build on it. So yes, it’s a very good thing.”

  To Contact Bishop O’Donoghue:
  Phone: (01524) 596050

  Cathedral House,
  Balmoral Road,
  Lancaster, UK
  LA1 3BT


Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.