News
Featured Image

(LifeSiteNews) — A vaccine adviser to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently suggested that the latest bivalent COVID-19 booster shots should be saved for older adults with previously existing health issues and are unnecessary for healthy young people.

Dr. Paul Offit, who is also a pediatrics professor at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, wrote an article presenting his argument that was published January 11 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

“Booster dosing is probably best reserved for the people most likely to need protection against severe disease — specifically, older adults, people with multiple coexisting conditions that put them at high risk for serious illness, and those who are immunocompromised,” Offit wrote. “In the meantime, I believe we should stop trying to prevent all symptomatic infections in healthy young people by boosting them with vaccines containing mRNA from strains that might disappear a few months later.”

Offit cited a study released in October that was “examining levels of neutralizing antibodies against BA.4 and BA.5 [subvariants of the omicron strain of COVID-19] after receipt of a monovalent or bivalent booster dose.” The researchers reportedly found “no significant difference in neutralization” when comparing the two groups. Offit highlighted another study showing similar results that “BA.5 titers were comparable following monovalent and bivalent mRNA boosters.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Stop Tedros' WHO Pandemic Treaty
  Show Petition Text
103191 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 125000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The WHO Pandemic Treaty looks set to be one of the biggest power-grabs in living memory, with unelected globalists seeking the power to declare pandemics, and then control your country's response. 

But it's not too late to do something about it. 

SIGN and SHARE this special petition telling Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus that the WHO will never usurp your nation's sovereignty.

The past two years have been rife with infringements on personal liberties and civil rights by national governments, but now the World Health Organization is seeking to appropriate those same abusive powers to itself at a global level. 

194 member states representing 99% of the world's population are expected to sign pandemic treaties with the WHO that would allow Tedros, or any future Director General, to dictate exactly how your nation would respond to a new disease outbreak which they consider a pandemic.

This attack on national sovereignty will come as no surprise to those who for years have listened to elites like Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates discussing their vision for the centralization of power into globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), the WHO and the rest of the United Nations. 

SIGN this petition against the WHO's Pandemic Treaty, before it's too late.

Ludicrously, 20 world leaders calling for the treaty, including Tedros, Boris Johnson and Emmanuel Macron, compared the post-Covid world to the post-WWII period, saying similar co-operation is now needed to "dispel the temptations of isolationism and nationalism, and to address the challenges that could only be achieved together in the spirit of solidarity and co-operation - namely peace, prosperity, health and security."

Australian PM Scott Morrison is the latest leader to express support for a “pandemic treaty”.

The stated intention of the WHO is to “kickstart a global process to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.”

The wheels are already in motion, with the Biden administration officially proposing the initial steps towards handing global pandemic control to the WHO. 

Biden's representatives have submitted amendments to the WHO's International Health Regulations (IHR), which would give the Director General the right to declare health emergencies in any nation, even when disputed by the country in question.

These amendments, which would be legally binding under international law, will be voted on by the World Health Assembly (the governing body of the WHO) at a special convention running from May 22-28 and set the stage for a fully-fledged pandemic treaty to be passed. 

SIGN and SHARE the petition telling the WHO that you won't accept any pandemic treaty

The ball has been rolling since the last World Health Assembly meeting in December, where the United States launched negotiations "on a new international health instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response," a U.S. statement read. 

"This momentous step represents our collective responsibility to work together to advance health security and to make the global health system stronger and more responsive. 

"We look forward to broad and deep negotiations using a whole-of-society and whole-of-government approach that will strengthen the international legal framework for public health/pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response and enable us to address issues of equity, accountability, and multisectoral collaboration evident in the COVID-19 pandemic. 

"We know it will take all of us working together across governments, private sector, philanthropy, academia, and civil society to make rapid progress towards a long-term solution for these complex problems," the U.S. statement added.

SIGN the petition today to show the WHO that you won't accept this attack on national sovereignty.

These are precarious times in which freedom and self-determination must be defended from those who would ride rough-shod over your civil rights. 

We do not want to go back to global lockdowns, vaccine mandates and propoganda.

Sign the petition - speak up now!

For More Information:

Biden hands over American sovereignty with proposed WHO treaty - LifeSiteNews

Pandemic Treaty is a backdoor to global governance - LifeSiteNews

Dr. Robert Malone on the WHO's power-grab - LifeSiteNews

**Photo: YouTube Screenshot**

  Hide Petition Text

“Neither research group found the bivalent boosters to elicit superior immune responses,” he wrote.

Additionally, Offit emphasized data from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on “the effectiveness of the BA.4 and BA.5 mRNA vaccines for preventing symptomatic infection within two months after receipt of the booster dose.”

According to this data, “extra protection” as a result of receiving a bivalent booster shot “ranged from 28% to 31%.” People who took a monovalent shot over eight months prior to receiving the booster, “the extra protection ranged from 43% to 56%.”

“Given the results of previous studies, it’s likely that this moderate increase in protection against probably generally mild disease will be short lived. As of November 15, 2022, only about 10% of the population for whom the bivalent vaccine had been recommended had received it. By December 2022, the BA.4 strain was no longer circulating, and BA.5 accounted for less than 25% of circulating SARs-CoV-2 strains.”

Offit explained that “neutralizing antibodies using a bivalent vaccine” was “most likely” a failed attempt because of imprinting. He argued that “the immune systems of people immunized with the bivalent vaccine, all of whom had previously been vaccinated, were primed to respond to the ancestral strain” of COVID.

“They therefore probably responded to epitopes shared by BA.4 and BA.5 and the ancestral strain, rather than to new epitopes on BA.4 and BA.5. This effect could possibly be moderated by immunizing people either with BA.4 and BA.5 mRNA alone or with a greater quantity of BA.4 and BA.5 mRNA.”

“Fortunately, SARS-CoV-2 variants haven’t evolved to resist the protection against severe disease offered by vaccination or previous infection,” Offit wrote, concluding his argument that booster shots for young, healthy individuals are unnecessary. “If that happens, we will need to create a variant-specific vaccine.”

The effectiveness of injecting healthy young people with mRNA vaccines has been a heated debate since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, becoming more prominent with the increase in reports citing adverse effects of the shots.

In September, a newly released study found that young adults are almost 100 times more likely to suffer from serious adverse effects from receiving the vaccine than from being infected with the disease. Another study from Oxford University found that those who receive an initial COVID vaccine and a booster shot are 44% more likely to contract the illness.

Last month, LifeSiteNews reported that a recent study showed COVID boosters are 18 times more dangerous for young people than contracting the virus itself.

RELATED:

Florida says young men should not receive mRNA COVID shots due to cardiac death risks

NBC acknowledges myocarditis link to COVID-19 vaccines after sudden deaths of young adults

COVID jabs are all but guaranteeing the virus will be around forever

2 Comments

    Loading...