Cassie Farrell

Fix that wall

Cassie Farrell
By Cassie Farrell

I never liked Kool-Aid. I didn’t trust its fluorescent colors, the ridiculous amount of sugar that went into its mix, not to mention that it hurt both my teeth and my stomach. Who likes puking blue mush? Not me. I really wanted to like it, and sometimes even deigned to drink some. This was mostly because other kids loved it and seemed excited about it. The image of the Kool-Aid guy crashing through walls unannounced to the jubilation of whoever happened to be in the room also appealed to my paleolithic sensibilities. Still, many birthday parties and Sky Dancers later (seriously my favorite staple gift of the 90’s. Bring them back!) I couldn’t make myself like it. This dislike only intensified as I learned about its affiliation with the Jim Jones Massacre, and understood the meaning of the phrase “drinking the Kool-Aid.”

It hurts my stomach and my empowered feminine mind to think that we live in a world where people still love Kool-Aid, and drink it by the gallon both figuratively and literally.

I realized this as I watched feminist progressives applaud the alleged rapist, serial sexual harasser, and celebrated liar Bill Clinton appear at the DNC to somehow bestow legitimacy upon Barack Obama as an option for president of the United States.

It reoccurred to me as I watched the embarrassingly melodramatic (and predominantly, Canadian) pro-Obama status updates blow up my newsfeed the night of his re-election. Apparently, hysterical tears and anthropomorphic reproductive organs have taken the continent by storm. I didn’t understand it in 2008, and I don’t understand it now – and that’s despite watching several hours of The View.

The only thing that makes less sense to me than self-respecting women valuing an endorsement from Bill Clinton is self-respecting women supporting Planned Parenthood. Cecile Richards was busy licking her chops and writing commander-in-chief love tweets as Tonya Reaves bled to death for over five hours after being irrevocably maimed during a legal abortion and then discarded by a Chicago-area Planned Parenthood. The Planned Parenthood did not give the local emergency room information regarding what went wrong, which only made the situation worse. The Planned Parenthood also refused to call 911, and eventually had her dropped off at the hospital by a Fire Department’s ambulance. Even an emergency hysterectomy couldn’t save her. She was 24 years old.

This came just a few months after Obama called Sandra Fluke to assure her that she wasn’t a slut. One is supposed to be able to tell from this action that he really cares about women, and unequivocally condemns misogynist, demeaning, and insulting speech. Oh, wait. Interestingly, Reaves’ orphaned son didn’t warrant any phone call, condolences, speaking engagements, or even acknowledgement from Obama or Richards. Obama has since made it clear that he wants his ties with Planned Parenthood to be as intimate as possible, and is still pretending that they actually provide mammograms (they don’t), and that they don’t aid and abet sex-trafficking, sex-selective abortion and statutory rape (they do). In a particularly un-feminist move, Planned Parenthood and its presidential advocate also don’t seem to value informed consent. At least they have time to make informative videos like this, and culturally sensitive videos like this. It seems that Reaves, her aborted child, her orphaned son, and all of the other victims of Planned Parenthood’s anti-woman practices are supposed to suck it up for the sake of Obama, his celebrity cheer squad, and free condoms. 

The fact that women voted for this violent and institutional misogyny in droves is disturbing, but not unsurprising given the identical trend that exists in Canada. Unfortunately, Canada remains the only Western industrialized country without any abortion legislation. This has been the case for decades, and means that the unborn child has no rights and no protections under the law. While Joyce Arthur and her supporters at the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada (ARCC) gush about their literally non-existent abortion rights, they simultaneously argue that unrestricted abortion access is necessary regardless of the gestational age of the fetus, but that late-term abortions rarely happen in Canada anyway. They are incorrect on both counts.

Meanwhile, another prominent pro-choice hypocrisy and insult to human intelligence is noted by the National Post’s George Jonas:

…the pro-choice crowd usually opposes capital punishment — except for the crime of inconveniencing a woman. Inconveniencing men is okay. Fathers can’t opt out of child-support if the mother decides to keep the baby, no matter how “inconvenient” fatherhood may be for them. Nor could a father save his child’s life even by assuming sole responsibility for its maintenance. Men and women are supposed to be equal… Yet fatherhood is compelled by law, while motherhood is a matter of choice. How do lawmakers get around this hurdle? In the same way they get around any question for which there’s no answer in logic or equity. They ignore it.

Despite these issues, and that polls show that most Canadians believe that there should be abortion restrictions, Canadians are still obligated to pay for these abortions through the public healthcare system, and do so without complaining. While there is a strong and growing youth movement to defund abortion in Canada, that Canadians have been complacent and comfortable with such an unjust situation for so long is troublesome.

It seems that blindly drinking “Kool-Aid” has a healthy history in both Canada and the United States, and the practice isn’t going away any time soon.  What is the solution to this problem?  It’s simple: spit that Kool-Aid out and think twice before taking another sip. It’s never too late to inform the Kool-Aid guy that somebody’s going to have to fix that wall. There is no reason to be satisfied with and accept something that is unsatisfactory and unacceptable. That includes blood-soaked misogyny dressed in a pink ribbon and peddled by direct beneficiaries in smart pantsuits, and generic ARCC rhetoric, logical inconsistencies, and general disdain for human life. Don’t forget about women, like Tonya Reaves, who are sacrificed on the altar of pro-choice politics and don’t receive even a sliver of the attention that Sandra Fluke received.

To read more blogs by CLC Youth, please click here.

FREE pro-life and pro-family news.

Stay up-to-date on the issues you care about the most. Subscribe today. 

Select Your Edition:

Share this article

Featured Image
Dustin Siggins Dustin Siggins Follow Dustin

Pelosi asked: Is unborn baby with human heart a ‘human being’? Responds: ‘I am a devout Catholic’

Dustin Siggins Dustin Siggins Follow Dustin
By Dustin Siggins

Tell Nancy Pelosi: No, supporting abortion and gay 'marriage' is not Catholic. Sign the petition. Click here.

WASHINGTON, D.C., October 2, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) -- Top Democrat Nancy Pelosi, D-CA, won't say whether an unborn child with a “human heart” and a “human liver” is a human being.

Pelosi, who is the Minority Leader in the House, was asked a question about the issue by CNS News at a press conference last week. The conservative news outlet asked, "In reference to funding for Planned Parenthood: Is an unborn baby with a human heart and a human liver a human being?”

Pelosi stumbled over her answer, saying, “Why don't you take your ideological questions--I don't, I don't have—”

CNS then asked her, "If it's not a human being, what species is it?”

It was then that Pelosi got back on stride, swatting aside the question with her accustomed reference to her “devout” Catholic faith.

“No, listen, I want to say something to you,” she said. “I don't know who you are and you're welcome to be here, freedom of this press. I am a devout practicing Catholic, a mother of five children. When my baby was born, my fifth child, my oldest child was six years old. I think I know more about this subject than you, with all due respect.”

“So it's not a human being, then?” pressed CNS, to which Pelosi said, “And I do not intend to respond to your questions, which have no basis in what public policy is that we do here.”

Pelosi has long used her self-proclaimed status as a “devout” practicing Catholic to promote abortion.

In response to a reporter’s question a proposed ban on late-term abortion in 2013, Pelosi said that the issue of late-term abortion is "sacred ground" for her.

"As a practicing and respectful Catholic, this is sacred ground to me when we talk about this," Pelosi said. "This shouldn't have anything to do with politics."

In 2008, she was asked by then-Meet the Press host David Gregory about when life begins. Pelosi said that "as an ardent, practicing Catholic, this is an issue I have studied for a long time. And what I know is that over the centuries, the doctors of the Church have not been able to make that definition....We don't know."

The Church has always taught that unborn human life is to be protected, and that such life is created at the moment of conception.

Featured Image
Ben Johnson Ben Johnson Follow Ben

New video: Planned Parenthood abortionist jokes about harvesting baby’s brains, getting ‘intact’ head

Ben Johnson Ben Johnson Follow Ben
By Ben Johnson

I interviewed my friend, David Daleiden, about his important work exposing Planned Parenthood's baby body parts trade on the Glenn Beck Program. David urged Congress to hold Planned Parenthood accountable and to demand the full truth. He also released never-before-seen footage showing a Planned Parenthood abortionist callously discussing how to obtain an intact brain from aborted babies.

Posted by Lila Rose on Monday, October 5, 2015


Sign the petition to defund Planned Parenthood here

WASHINGTON, D.C., October 5, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) - In the newest video footage released by the Center for Medical Progress, a Planned Parenthood abortionist laughs as she discusses her hope of removing the intact "calvarium," or skull, of an unborn baby while preserving both lobes of the brain.

She also describes how she first dismembers babies up to twenty weeks gestation, including two twenty-week babies she said she aborted the week before.

Dr. Amna Dermish, an abortionist with Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas, told undercover investigators she had never been able to remove the calivarium (skull) of an aborted child "intact," but she hopes to.

"Maybe next time," the investigator said.

"I know, right?" Dr. Dermish replied. "Well, this'll give me something to strive for."

Dermish, who performs abortions up to the 20-week legal limit in Austin, then described the method she used to collect fetal brain and skull specimens.

"If it’s a breech presentation [in which the baby is born feet first] I will remove the extremities first - the lower extremities - and then go for the spine," she began.

She then slides the baby down the birth canal until she can snip the spinal cord.

The buyer noted that intact organs fetch higher prices from potential buyers, who seek them for experimentation.

"I always try to keep the trunk intact," she said.

"I don't routinely convert to breech, but I will if I have to," she added.

Converting a child to the breech position is the first step of the partial birth abortion procedure. The procedure has been illegal since President Bush signed legislation in 2003 making it a federal felony punishable by two years in prison and a fine of $250,000.

According to CMP lead investigator David Daleiden, who debuted the video footage during an interview with Lila Rose on The Blaze TV, Dr. Dermish was trained by Planned Parenthood's senior director of medical services, Dr. Deborah Nucatola.

Dr. Nucatola was caught on the first CMP undercover video, discussing the side industry while eating a salad and drinking red wine during a business luncheon.

Between sips, she described an abortion process that legal experts believe is a partial birth abortion, violating federal law.

“The federal abortion ban is a law, and laws are up to interpretation,” Dr. Nucatola said on the undercover footage. “So, if I say on day one that I don't intend to do this, what ultimately happens doesn't matter.”

Daleiden told Rose he hoped that Congressional investigators would continue to pressure the organization about whether the abortion technique it uses violates federal law, as well as the $60-per-specimen fee the national organization has admitted some of its affiliates receive.

Trafficking in human body parts for "valuable consideration" is also a federal felony carrying a penalty of up to 10 years in prison and a $500,000 fine.

"That would be enough to construct a criminal case against Planned Parenthood," Daleiden said.

Share this article

Featured Image
Nancy Flanders


He used to be an abortionist; now, he fights to save the lives of the preborn

Nancy Flanders
By Nancy Flanders

October 5, 2015 (LiveActionNews) -- In 1976, Dr. Anthony Levatino, an OB/GYN, graduated from medical school and was, without a doubt, pro-abortion. He strongly supported abortion “rights” and believed abortion was a decision to be made between a woman and her doctor.

“A lot of people identify themselves as pro-life or pro-choice, but for so many people, it doesn’t really touch them personally; it doesn’t impact their lives in the way that I wish it would. If nothing more than in the voting booth, if nowhere else,” said Levatino in a speech for the Pro-Life Action League. “But when you’re an obstetrician / gynecologist and you say I’m pro-choice – well, that becomes rather a more personal thing because you’re the one who does the abortions and you have to make the decision of whether you’ll do that or not.”

Levatino learned how to do first and second trimester abortions. Thirty to forty years ago, second trimester abortions were done by saline injection, which was dangerous.

"For the first time in my life, after all those years, all those abortions, I really looked, I mean I really looked at that pile of goo on the side of the table that used to be somebody’s son or daughter and that’s all I could see."

At that same time, Levatino and his wife were struggling with fertility problems and were considering adoption. They knew however, how difficult it was to adopt a newborn.

“It was the first time that I had any doubts about what I was doing because I knew very well that part of the reason why it’s difficult to find children to adopt were that doctors like me were killing them in abortions,” said Levatino.

Finally, in 1978, the couple adopted their daughter, Heather. Right after the adoption, they discovered they were expecting a baby, and their son was born just 10 months later.

Levatino describes a “perfectly happy” life at this time and says that despite those first qualms about abortion, he went right back to work performing them.

In 1981, after graduating from his residency, Levatino joined an OB/GYN practice which also offered abortions as a service. Saline infusion was the most common method for second trimester abortions at the time, but it ran the risk of babies born alive. The procedures were also expensive, difficult, and required the mother to go through labor. Levatino and his partners trained themselves to perform the D&E abortion procedure, which is used today.

In his speech, he describes what it’s like to perform the now routine procedure:

You take an instrument like this called a sopher clamp and you basically – the surgery is that you literally tear a child to pieces. The suction is only for the fluid. The rest of it is literally dismembering a child piece by piece with an abortion instrument […] absolutely gut-wrenching procedure.

Over the next four years, Levatino would perform 1,200 abortions, over 100 of them D&E, second trimester abortions.

But then everything changed. On a beautiful day in June of 1984, the family was at home enjoying time with friends when Levatino heard tires squeal. The children were in the street and Heather had been hit by a car.

“She was a mess,” he explained. “And we did everything we possibly could. But she ultimately died, literally in our arms, on the way to the hospital that evening.”

After a while, Levatino had to return to work. And one day, his first D&E since the accident was on his schedule. He wasn’t really thinking about it or concerned. To him, it was going to be a routine procedure he had done many times before. Only it wasn’t.

“I started that abortion and I took that sopher clamp and I literally ripped out an arm or a leg and I just stared at it in the clamp. And I got sick,” he explained. “But you know something, when you start an abortion you can’t stop. If you don’t get all the pieces – and you literally stack them up on the side of the table […] your patient is going to come back infected, bleeding or dead. So I soldiered on and I finished that abortion.”

But by the time the abortion was complete, Levatino was beginning to feel a change of heart:

For the first time in my life, after all those years, all those abortions, I really looked, I mean I really looked at that pile of goo on the side of the table that used to be somebody’s son or daughter and that’s all I could see. I couldn’t see what a great doctor I was being. I didn’t see how I helped this woman in her crisis. I didn’t see the 600 dollars cash I had just made in 15 minutes. All I could see was somebody’s son or daughter. And after losing my daughter this was looking very, very different to me.

Levatino stopped performing second trimester abortions but continued to provide first trimester abortions for the next few months.

“Everybody puts doctors on a pedestal and we’re all supposed to be so smart but we’re no different than anybody else,” he said.

Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!

He realized that killing a baby at 20 weeks gestation was exactly the same as killing one at nine weeks gestation or even two weeks gestation. He understood that it doesn’t matter how big or small the baby is, it’s a human life. He has not done an abortion since February 1985 and says there is no chance he will ever perform one again.

Adamant that he would never join the pro-life movement because of the media’s portrayal of pro-lifers as crazy, he was eventually invited to a pro-life potluck dinner where he met people who he realized were intelligent volunteers who spent their time defending preborn humans.

After that, Levatino began speaking out against abortion specifically with young people, graphically describing for them what an abortion really is.

Levatino has also testified before Congress, asking our government to end legal abortion.

Reprinted with permission from Live Action News

Share this article


Customize your experience.

Login with Facebook