News
Featured Image
Maggie DeJongAlliance Defending Freedom

Help a brave therapist being attacked by Southern Poverty Law Center: LifeFunder

EAST ST. LOUIS, Illinois (LifeSiteNews) – A former graduate student is suing her alma mater after being given “no contact” order over expressing her Christian beliefs and political views to classmates.

The lawsuit, filed Tuesday by the conservative Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) on behalf of Maggie DeJong alleges that she “suffered sleeplessness, anxiety, chest pains, feelings of sadness, loss of appetite, weight loss, lack of concentration, harm to her reputation, and future loss of employment and wages” as a result of a “no contact” order issued by Southern Illinois University Edwardsville (SUIE).

The lawsuit further alleges that SIUE “acted with malice or a reckless and callous indifference” regarding DeJong’s First Amendment right to speech and her Fourteenth Amendment right to due process.

DeJong, an art therapy student, graduated last month.

According to the lawsuit, DeJong received the orders in February after at least three students complained about her views on religion, politics, critical race theory, COVID-19 regulations, and censorship. The lawsuit further states that DeJong was not given the opportunity to defend herself or was told which policy or rule she violated.

“This order is being issued upon information and belief that interactions between yourself and [redacted] would not be welcome or appropriate at this time,” one of the orders read. The orders also stated that any infringement could lead to further “disciplinary consequences.”

SIUE later rescinded the orders after receiving from ADF a letter that stated legal action would be taken if the orders were not lifted.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION CONGRESS: Stop the grooming & sexualization of children in schools
  Show Petition Text
6950 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 7500!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

At least 135 U.S. teachers and teachers’ aides have already been arrested in 2022 for child-related sex crimes, ranging from child porn possession to rape, and these are only the cases reported by the media.

And, while the vast majority of teachers are upstanding citizens, we also know some are indoctrinating our children with the LGBT ideology and practices to "make an ally of them" at a wholly inappropriate age.

This is not acceptable, and must be stopped now.

SIGN: Congress must ban federal funding for schools promoting sex or LGBT ideologies among children.

With Governor Ron DeSantis already taking action in Florida, banning instruction on sexuality and gender identity by teachers among third graders and younger, it's now time to see a federal push to effectively end such meddling in the minds of our children.

Parents have a responsibility to defend their children from those who overstep boundaries, whether that's in the form of LGBT propaganda, pornography, or other forms of sexualization in schools.

Too often the media downplays what's at stake: nothing less than the innocence of our children, and sometimes even their very lives, as this grieving Mom explained in March.

SIGN and SHARE: Congress must ban federal funding for schools who attempt to sexualize children.

76% of the arrests of teachers and aides for child-related sex-crimes this year involved assaults on students. 

Jonathan van Maren reports that while one California teacher was charged with aggravated assault of a child, another was charged with 29 counts of child molestation. 

A North Carolina science teacher was charged with 27 counts of first-degree sexual exploitation of a minor and 28 counts of “indecent liberties with a student.”

Parents need to construct every possible barrier to more children being abused, and one important way is to stop groomers and potential groomers from discussing sex with children in the classroom. 

It is a violation of trust to introduce someone else's precious child to the minefield of sexuality, and it breaks down inhibitions that are meant to protect our most vulnerable young people.

SIGN TODAY: Pull federal funding from any school that sexualizes children

We already know that drag queens, some of whom admit to grooming, have no place in the classroom, and that teaching children about gender identities and sexual preferences is wholly inappropriate, but it's beyond time we took action.

Thank you for signing the petition today.

More Information: 

Groomer: An empty slur or based in reality? - LifeSiteNews

Grooming begins with teacher's personal disclosure of sexual preferences - LifeSiteNews

Gay Choir sings "We'll convert your children" - LifeSiteNews

**Photo: Visual aid from National Association of Independent Schools (NAIS)**

  Hide Petition Text

Speaking to Campus Reform in April, DeJong commented, “Because of these orders, I was unable to fully participate in my classes, go to certain locations on campus when the other students were present, and fully take part in the academic program. Students should not be bullied and intimidated because of their viewpoints, and I hope that the university will never let this happen again.”

The lawsuit also details how Megan A. Robb, graduate director of the art therapy program at SIUE, emailed more than 30 students about DeJong, telling them that she was the target of a “misconduct” and “oppressive acts” investigation. According to the lawsuit, SIUE policy holds that school officials are to “take all reasonable steps to ensure confidentiality” during such an investigation.

“University officials then sat on their hands as Defendant Robb, her student followers, and even alumni dragged Ms. DeJong’s reputation through the mud simply because she holds views on an array of topics that differ from those espoused in the echo chamber that is the SIUE Art Therapy Program,” the lawsuit states.

Speaking to The Daily Citizen, ADF attorney Gregg Walters said that it was necessary to sue SIUE in spite of the school dropping the no-contact orders, saying “Maggie not only asked the University to rescind the no-contact orders and to drop its investigation, she also requested that the University publicly clear her of any wrongdoing and change its unconstitutional speech policies.”

“Officials have refused those requests. Maggie won’t be the last student afflicted by the university’s unconstitutional speech policies – policies that officials have shown they will use to silence speech they don’t agree with,” Walters concluded.

In a statement released by ADF, Walters further stated, “Rather than accept and embrace diverse ideological perspectives, SIUE officials are determined to force their graduate students to think and speak exactly the same – or stay silent – and they will punish anyone who steps out of line.”

“It is a sad day for civil dialogue and freedom of speech when universities can issue gag orders like those issued against Maggie for nothing more than expressing her beliefs – beliefs held by millions of Americans.”

The lawsuit seeks unspecified “compensatory, nominal, and punitive damages,” and that SIUE pay for DeJong’s legal fees. The lawsuit also asks the court to find that SIUE violated DeJong’s constitutional rights and was subject to an unconstitutional investigation.

Early last month, a tenured Christian professor at a public Ohio university who refused to use the “preferred pronouns” of some of his students won a settlement with the help of ADF.

In March 2021, a study found that conservative academics “experience a hostile work environment” at most universities in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.

SIUE did not immediately respond to LifeSite’s request for comment.

Help a brave therapist being attacked by Southern Poverty Law Center: LifeFunder

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

4 Comments

    Loading...