News
Featured Image
Coronavirus in FranceShutterstock

PARIS, France, April 21, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — As the COVID-19 vaccine “roll-out” continues to proceed in France, the National Drug Agency (Agence nationale du médicament, ANSM) has released new figures showing that during the last week it has assessed, from April 2 to April 8, nine new cases of severe thrombosis (blood clots) linked to the AstraZeneca shot were registered. Of these, four resulted in death.

23 cases of thrombosis and blood clots, and a total of 8 deaths, have now been ascribed to the newly named Vaxzevria AstraZeneca mRNA vaccine, as well as a total of 15 facial paralyses; further neurological damage had also been noted in other vaccinated people, but they have since recovered.

Earlier this month, the Tours region of France saw an unheard-of volume of reported adverse effects, mainly with the AstraZeneca shot which has been primarily given to younger people who have more violent immune reactions.

Things even got so bad that people in Touraine with adverse effects were being asked not to report them if they were not very serious.

“By the end of March, in 3 months, we had the same volume of activity as for the whole year 2020: we had received about 1,400 reports, including a large proportion related to vaccines, up to 200 per week, with a peak from 15 to 21 March with more than 200,” explained Dr. Annie-Pierre Jonville-Baré, head of the pharmacovigilance agency (CRPV) of Tours and president of the national network of CRPVs. “There have been very few Moderna and Pfizer jabs in the region, with few reports. The younger people are, the more they have reactogenic effects — that is to say fever, and muscle pain that lasts 24 or 48 hours. Since at the beginning we vaccinated the elderly in retirement homes, these effects, which are not serious and very transient, were hardly ever seen. We expected this increase in reports with the AstraZeneca vaccine, but not to this extent,” she said, adding, “We communicate a lot to ask patients not to declare everything and the ARS (Regional Health Agency) does the same thing at the level of doctors, so the volume has decreased but the situation remains tense.”

By April 8, the French Higher Health Authority (Haute autorité de santé) recommended that people who had received a first injection of AstraZeneca — some 530,000 people at the time — get a different booster jab (Pfizer or Moderna). It should be recalled that all these so-called vaccines are still in the experimental phase and that the mixing of two different gene therapy techniques has not been assessed at all for safety and efficacy.

In some French homes for the elderly, COVID-19 clusters are now appearing among residents and caregivers who actually got the experimental vaccines. In Auzances, in the depopulated Creuse region near Limoges, 24 residents and 14 employees tested positive at the end of March: it was the first time since the beginning of the Wuhan virus crisis that this had happened. Three of the elderly patients died of the South-African or Brazilian variant — two had been fully vaccinated.

The director of the home told the press that the patients who had died were over 90 and had multiple comorbidities and were already very frail when they contracted the virus. But it was precisely these people the experimental vaccines are supposed to protect from severe cases of COVID.

As suspicion grows regarding the AstraZeneca Vaxzevria shot, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved the Johnson & Johnson shot for the whole of the European Union, at the same time admitting that “very rare” blood clotting is linked to the use of the American vaccine, and that this is very similar to the incidents recorded with AstraZeneca. The risk-benefit ratio is in favor of using the jab, according to the EMA. French health minister Olivier Véran declared on Tuesday that France “needs” both the controversial shots in order to keep up with its vaccination schedule.

With this, the EMA moved faster than the U.S. to approve the use of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine.

To date, less than 13 million people out of a population of over 67 million have received a first dose, and some 4.7 million have received the second dose. With less than 20 percent of its population having received the first shot, France is lagging behind — which might turn out to be a blessing in disguise, given the many unknown factors regarding the vaccines in the long run.

At least a third of health workers, especially nurses and nurses’ aides, are continuing to decline the shot, even though so they must then undergo regular COVID-19 testing. While in Italy COVID-19 vaccination is compulsory for health workers, moves in that direction were quickly given up in France, probably due to the known opposition of a significant part of the population.

This opposition has been strengthened by the widely commented decision of several families of victims of the AstraZeneca shot to sue for damages in criminal proceedings: these complaints followed the death of a “perfectly healthy” 24-year-old medical student in Saint-Nazaire, that of a 38-year-old athletic woman in Toulouse, and that of a 63-year-old man who died in the Alps after suffering multiple thromboses. Some fifteen other lawsuits have been opened following severe adverse effects after a Pfizer shot, including stroke and unexplained trembling.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Say 'No' to COVID 'Vaccine Passports'!
  Show Petition Text
215403 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 225000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Powerful nations of the world, including China, the UK, and Canada are discussing plans to require so-called 'vaccine passports' as a condition for travel, and possibly to restrict entry to shopping and entertainment venues.

Israel has already put in place a system to discriminate against those who choose not to take the COVID vaccine, and, in the United States, Joe Biden has signed a new executive order which could pave the way for the implementation of a 'vaccine passport' system. [See more below.]

This kind of medical dictatorship must be resisted, and therefore, we must act quickly before these authoritarian notions take root and spread!

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition to SAY NO to government 'vaccine passports.' Tell your legislators to respect your freedom not to vaccinate without fear of repercussion.

People should not have to live in fear of government retribution for refusing a vaccine which is being rushed to market by Big Pharma and their fellow-travelers in NGOs, like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

It would be intolerable and immoral for the government to coerce someone, and their family, to take a COVID vaccine against their will just so they can do their weekly grocery shopping, go to a high school soccer game, travel on public transport, or visit their relatives who live in a different part of the country, or overseas.

Medical freedom must be respected in principle and also in practice.

So, it is now time that our policy-makers listen to all voices involved in this vital conversation, and start to represent those who will not tolerate being punished, restricted, or tracked for refusing an experimental vaccine.

Simply put, legislatures must begin to act as legislatures again.

Questions must be asked. Hearings and investigations must be held. And, the legislatures of each state and country must return to the business of representing the people who voted for them, assuming their rightful place as the originator of legislation.

We will no longer accept the dictates of executive branches without question. And, neither can we accept the dictates of some doctors who seem detached from reality and from science.

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition which asks national political leaders (as well as state and provincial legislators in the U.S. and Canada) to pledge to respect the rights of those who refuse a COVID vaccine, and NOT introduce 'vaccine passports,' or any other system which would discriminate on the basis of taking the COVID vaccine.

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

'Biden executive order directs government to evaluate ‘feasibility’ of vaccine passports' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/biden-executive-order-directs-government-to-evaluate-feasibility-of-vaccine-passports

'China lobbies WHO to develop COVID vaccine passports for all nations' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/china-lobbies-who-to-develop-covid-vaccine-passports-for-all-nations

'UK advances plans for vaccine passports to travel, enter stores' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/uk-advances-plans-for-vaccine-passports-to-travel-enter-stores

'Canada’s health minister: Gov’t ‘working on the idea of vaccine passports’' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/canadas-health-minister-govt-working-on-the-idea-of-vaccine-passports

'European Commission president plans to introduce vaccine passports' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/european-commission-president-plans-to-introduce-vaccine-passports

'Israel’s ‘Green Passport’ vaccination program has created a ‘medical Apartheid,’ distraught citizens say' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/israels-green-passport-vaccination-program-has-created-a-medical-apartheid-distraught-citizens-say

'LA schools to track every kid using Microsoft’s ‘Daily Pass’ COVID app' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/la-schools-to-track-every-kid-using-microsofts-daily-pass-covid-app

  Hide Petition Text

On April 17, an independent information group regarding COVID-19, “collectif Reinfocovid,” which includes many professional health workers, published an analysis of all the adverse effects of COVID-19 “vaccines” in Europe between January 1 and April 6, 2021.

Its main findings included that the proportion of serious adverse effects linked with the shots is “very high” compared with those of ordinary flu shots with the inactive virus given in 2020. It called the proportion of “sudden deaths,” less than 24 hours after vaccination, and touching victims of all ages, “very disturbing.”

“The supposed lethality rate associated with the COVID-19 vaccine for 18-to-44-year-olds is identical to the mortality rate associated with the COVID-19 disease itself,” said the report. This is true for both AstraZeneca and Pfizer shots, and even seven times higher for the Moderna shot, the report added.

There are 60 times more suspicious deaths after the Pfizer and AstraZeneca shot than after a flu shot, and 400 times more suspicious deaths with the Moderna shot, which means that the risk of sudden death is 20 to 60 times higher after the COVID-19 shot than after a flu shot, according to the report.

The report complained about insufficient information about highly bioactive substances that are being injected into muscular tissue, while the new shots are massively using “genetic engineering for the first time in the history of medicine”: mRNA and genetically modified organism techniques.

The report stressed that for younger people aged under 75, the vaccine is associated with a sudden death risk that is totally absent with COVID-19 itself, in which death occurs after a period of time in resuscitation units.

All the tables of the study can be found here.

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.