Featured Image
Germany’s health minister, Jens Spahnphoenix / YouTube

LifeSiteNews has been permanently banned on YouTube. Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library.

BERLIN, Germany (LifeSiteNews) — Top German officials made multiple comments last month suggesting that vaccinated people in Germany will enjoy “more freedom” than unvaccinated people and implicitly suggested that if a new lockdown were to occur, it would affect only the unvaccinated.

The officials included Germany’s health minister, Jens Spahn, 41, and Angela Merkel’s chief of staff and senior advisor, Helge Braun, 48.

The first comment was made by Braun on July 2 in an interview he gave to German radio news channel MDR during which he discussed the possibility of a new lockdown which he said will depend on the efficacy of the vaccine.

Braun also established a clear distinction between vaccinated and unvaccinated people by stating, “As long as the vaccination works well, a lockdown at the expense of those who are fully vaccinated is out of the question.”

His words were echoed by health minister Jens Spahn at a press conference that also took place on July 2. Spahn told reporters in Berlin, “As long as there are no mutations that impact the protection from vaccines (…), then being fully vaccinated means that restrictions of the kind we saw last winter will not be necessary, needed, or legally appropriate.”

Spahn used similarly divisive language during the last German lockdown in April of this year. Having lifted lockdown restrictions for fully vaccinated people, the German health minister told national newspaper Bild that “anyone who is vaccinated can go to the shop or the hairdresser without further testing.”

Chief of staff Braun echoed this position on July 25 in an interview with Bild: 

“Those who have been vaccinated will definitely have more freedom than those who have not been vaccinated.”

Braun went on to say that even unvaccinated people who present a negative COVID test will still be denied entry to certain venues such as bars, cinemas, and sporting events.

“If we have a high rate of infection despite our testing procedures then the unvaccinated will have to reduce their contacts,” he said.

“That can mean that certain options like restaurants, cinemas, and visits to stadiums, even for unvaccinated people who have been tested, would no longer be possible, because the risk to everyone else is too high.”

The statement was reminiscent of Boris Johnson’s recent announcement regarding vaccine passports in the UK in which the British Prime Minister stated: “Proof of negative test will no longer be sufficient.”

When Braun was asked whether this was legally permissible, and whether the state could dictate such a measure, he replied:

“Yes! The State has the duty to protect the health of its citizens.”

Angela Merkel’s most senior advisor appeared on a Bild live-show the next day to explain his position further, only to be challenged by his interviewer, who pointed out the blatant contradictions in Braun’s statements.

The show host recalled that the chief of staff had said in March: “Once we’ve offered the vaccine to everyone in Germany, then we can go back to normality in all sectors of society. The ones who do not take this opportunity are making their own individual decision to accept the risk of infection. After this, we can no longer justify any restriction on fundamental rights. We can return to full normality, and all restrictions must go.”

Bild’s reporter then pointed out that, from the end of September, everyone in Germany will have been offered the vaccine and asked why Braun’s previous statement no longer applied.

The chief of staff struggled to explain his change of position and contradicted himself again, claiming to stand 100% by his previous statement while at the same time noting that it presented “two problems,” one of which being the lack of available vaccines for children (a fact which was already established in March when Braun made his statement) and the second being the necessity to reach a level of herd immunity which he estimated at around 80%.

Braun’s interviewer did not fail to point out the irony of making the individual right to opt for vaccination or not dependent on an 80% herd immunity through mass vaccination.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: No to mandatory vaccination for the coronavirus
  Show Petition Text
1075366 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 1100000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

People of goodwill can disagree about the safety, efficacy and religious implications of a new vaccine for the coronavirus.

But, everyone should agree on this point:

No government can force anyone who has reached legal adulthood to be vaccinated for the coronavirus. Equally, no government can vaccinate minors for the coronavirus against the will of their parents or guardians.

Please SIGN this urgent petition which urges policymakers at every level of government to reject calls for mandatory coronavirus vaccination.

Fear of a disease - which we know very little about, relative to other similar diseases - must not lead to knee-jerk reactions regarding public health, nor can it justify supporting the hidden agenda of governmental as well as non-governmental bodies that have apparent conflicts of interest in plans to restrict personal freedoms. 

The so-called "public health experts" have gotten it wrong many times during the current crisis. We should not, therefore, allow their opinions to rush decision-makers into policies regarding vaccination.

And, while some people, like Bill Gates, may have a lot of money, his opinion and that of his NGO (the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) - namely, that life will not return to normal till people are widely vaccinated - should not be permitted to influence policy decisions on a coronavirus vaccination program.

Finally, we must also not allow the rush by pharmaceutical companies to produce a new coronavirus vaccine to, itself, become an imperative for vaccination.

Unwitting citizens must not be used as guinea pigs for New World Order ideologues, or Big Pharma, in pursuit of a vaccine (and, profits) which may not even protect against future mutated strains of the coronavirus.

And it goes without saying that the production of vaccines using aborted babies for cell replication is a total non-starter, as the technique is gravely immoral.

However, if after sufficient study of the issue, a person who has reached the age of majority wishes to be vaccinated with a morally produced vaccine, along with his children, that is his business.

But we cannot and will not permit the government to make that decision for us.

Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition, urging policymakers at all levels of government to reject mandatory coronavirus vaccination.


Bill Gates: Life won’t go back to ‘normal’ until population 'widely vaccinated' -

COVID-19 scare leads to more digital surveillance, talk of mandatory vaccine 'tattoos' for kids' -

Trudeau says no return to ‘normal’ without vaccine: 'Could take 12 to 18 months' -

Trudeau mulls making coronavirus vaccine mandatory for Canadians -

US bishop vows to ‘refuse’ COVID-19 vaccine if made from ‘aborted fetal tissue' -

** While LifeSite opposes immorally-produced vaccines using aborted fetal cell lines, we do not have a position on any particular coronavirus vaccines produced without such moral problems. We realize many have general concerns about vaccines, but also recognize that millions of lives have been saved due to vaccines.

*** Photo Credit:

  Hide Petition Text

Braun’s comments have generated much debate within the German political arena, including in Braun’s own party, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU).

Armin Laschet, the 60-year-old leader of the CDU, reacted in an interview with ZDF, Germany’s national public television broadcaster, by saying: “I don’t believe in mandatory vaccination, and I don’t believe in indirectly putting pressure on people so that they get vaccinated (…). In a free country, freedom rights are not just reserved for specific groups of people.”

The left-wing opposition also showed negative reactions. The Vice President of the Bundestag and member of the Free Democratic Party (FDP) Wolfgang Kubicki, 69, warned that Braun’s initiative could mean “the introduction of compulsory vaccinations through the back door,” adding that “the exercise of fundamental rights cannot be made permanently dependent on ‘good behavior’ that the Chancellery defines as correct (…). The federal government hereby accepts a massive division of society.”

Kubicki also deemed Braun’s initiative unconstitutional.

“Such a categorization of basic rights into a first and a second class is clearly unconstitutional,” he said.

There are those, however, who supported Braun’s and Spahn’s view, including Alexander Dobrindt, the 51-year-old leader of the Christian Social Union (CSU) group.

Dobrindt told the Welt newspaper: “Vaccinated people protect themselves and others; that’s why normality is the logical consequence for this group.” He commented further that “this normality for vaccinated people must also be possible when it requires restrictions for the unvaccinated.”

As of July 21, just over 25 million Germans, that is, 31% of the country’s total population, have been fully vaccinated against COVID-19. Overall, 42 million (51%) have received at least their first dose.


Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.