Featured Image
Nicolaus Festscreenshot

BRUSSELS (LifeSiteNews) — A German Member of the European Parliament (MEP) has demanded an investigation into deaths related to the abortion-tainted COVID-19 shots. He asked that manufacturers be held liable for damages arising from their jabs in a penetrating speech to parliament Monday.

German MEP Nicolaus Fest, a member of the conservative AfD party, addressed the gathered parliamentarians by accusing European governments of lying about their intentions with the widespread inoculation programs against the novel coronavirus.

Whereas leaders had first stated “they only wanted to vaccinate the vulnerable groups,” which he said covers — for the most part — people aged 60 and over, “now they say, no, you have to start at the age of 18.”

“So now we want to vaccinate the entire world,” Fest lamented. “Naturally one wonders why, because up until now the reasons have all been either wrong or misleading.”

The politician said leaders had lied about the level of “vaccine” coverage required before considering the population to have reached herd immunity, first claiming that 70 percent uptake in “vaccination” would suffice to reach the threshold. “Now they say we need 100 percent,” Fest stated.

“The peak of this absurdity is that the unvaccinated are a danger to the vaccinated,” he added, calling into question the justification for the jab rollout based on acting “out of solidarity with vulnerable groups.”

Fest referenced the mounting studies which indicate that the double jabbed carry “a particularly high viral load,” arguing that, contrary to governmental advice suggesting only those who have received the jab should be in close contact with the most vulnerable, for such groups “it is obviously safest if they are visited by unvaccinated people.”

Indeed, Dr. Paul Elias Alexander, Ph.D., a former professor at McMaster University in evidence-based medicine and former COVID pandemic advisor in Washington, D.C., has warned that the current crop of experimental COVID injections opens the risk of carrying increased viral loads, leading him to state that “the vaccinated must not be overlooked as a key source of infection.”

Fest highlighted the occurrence of “vaccine breakthroughs” — those who have contracted the virus following a full regimen of immunization — as further evidence of the failure of the jabs.

Regarding the push for booster shots, Fest said “the newest rationale to be heard here now is, since the first two vaccinations have thus totally failed, we should urgently be vaccinated a third time, with a vaccine that will probably fail just like the last two vaccines did the first time around.”

“That’s really smart,” the lawmaker sardonically added.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Ban Critical Race Theory in public schools
  Show Petition Text
9395 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 10000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The dangerous ideas of Critical Race Theory (CRT) are being forced on students in public schools around the country.

This is wrong and parents have had enough! It's time to join them in saying "STOP!" to this harmful and racist propaganda.

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition which says "No to CRT" in public schools, and "Yes to parents' right" to strongly protest CRT.

But, what is CRT anyway and why is it so dangerous?

Critical Race Theory is a hateful system of indoctrination which teaches that one race is either superior or inferior to another race, and that the United States is inherently racist.

CRT is dangerous and hateful precisely because it teaches children who are not white to despise and envy white children simply because of their skin color. And, as a result, it also teaches white children to despise themselves simply because of the color of their skin.

CRT also erroneously teaches that American society is inherently racist, and that different, detrimental policies (like reparations for slavery and race-based pay scales) should be imposed on the population to redistribute wealth from whites to non-whites.

This type of racist/marxist propaganda should have NO place in public, taxpayer-funded schools!

And, thankfully, American parents of EVERY COLOR are raising their voices and ballots against it!

Indeed, parents understand the destructive ramifications of CRT and, despite outrageous threats from Biden's Justice Department to prosecute them, they have been strongly protesting CRT at school board meetings across the country!

And now, in the first test of its kind, a candidate who was campaigning hard against CRT just won the governorship of Virginia in a huge upset victory.

That's great news, but we now need to contact every state legislature about this crucial educational issue.

And, we need to DEMAND that they BAN Critical Race Theory from every public school in their states - both primary and high schools, and colleges!

Whereas advocates of CRT seem more intent on vengence than on teaching children of every race to respect everybody, regardless of skin color, American parents of every race understand that it is not the color of one's skin that matters, but the content of one's character (to paraphrase Martin Luther King, Jr.).

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition asking all state legislatures to BAN Crititical Race Theory from public schools in their respective states.

Thank you!


'States are fighting the Left over the morally bankrupt critical race theory' -

'Parents who oppose Critical Race Theory in schools could be prosecuted by FBI' -

Ohio parents testify: Yes, critical race theory is in our schools, and we say NO! -

An excellent Heritage Foundation document on CRT: Critical Race Theory Would Not Solve Racial Inequality: It Would Deepen It

**Photo Credit: EJ Nickerson /

  Hide Petition Text

More pressing still are the deaths linked to use of the experimental shots. “In Germany, we have 48 confirmed cases of deaths that occurred in connection with the vaccination,” Fest said, qualifying that those 48 “are just the cases that were autopsied.”

“Of course, we know that many people who died after a vaccination were not autopsied at all. That means the unreported number is probably many times higher.”

The EU’s adverse event tracking system for newly developed drugs, Eudravigilance, includes a staggering 2,890,000 injury reports on its database following administration of the COVID jabs up until November 20. Of that number, 31,014 deaths have been reported in the days and weeks since receiving the jab.

Eudravigilance does not account for the entire continent of Europe, rather recording only those injuries reported within the 27 European Union member states.

Regarding the 48 deaths which German autopsies have confirmed were caused by the COVID jabs, Fest demanded accountability on the part of the pharmaceutical companies.

“If any company, let’s say Nestlé or Pepsi or any other company, were to put a product on the market and then 48 people were to die from it within a year, we wouldn’t talk about whether we should or should not distribute this product to the world. We would talk about whether or not we should enforce liability on the management.”

Accordingly, Fest “urgently” requested the European Parliament to consider “discussing the [lack of] efficacy of these vaccines and about liability issues for the management of the vaccine manufacturers.”

“I think that’s what this parliament should concentrate on, not on vaccinating the world.”


Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.