Featured Image
Sharon GustafsonSenator Kaine / YouTube

WASHINGTON, D.C, April 14, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – An employment law attorney who was appointed as the first female General Counsel to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in 2019 by then-President Donald Trump has been fired at “the direction of President Biden” after writing a report on religious discrimination in the workplace.

Sharon Fast Gustafson was asked by Deputy Assistant to the President Gautam Raghavan, who claimed to be acting at “the direction of President Biden,” to voluntarily resign her position at the White House by the end of the same week, just three days later.

Gustafson “respectfully” declined the invitation to resign in a three-page response to the president on March 5, wherein she acknowledged that she had served only about half of her appointed four-year term due to end in August 2023.

“At the time I was nominated, I was asked if I would commit to do my best to fulfil my four-year term, and I answered yes,” she wrote in the letter. “Unless prevented from doing so, I intend to honor that commitment.”

Within a few hours of sending her letter to the president, Raghavan responded in a curtly worded email, informing Gustafson that her “employment as General Counsel of the EEOC is terminated,” effective end-of-day that day.

Gustafson noted that her removal was unprecedented, describing the decision as motivated by partisanship: “So far as I know, no previous General Counsel has been fired for being appointed by the wrong political party.” She later told CBN News that she “was given no reason at all for the termination,” but speculated that it involved her unabashed support for religious liberty.

The EEOC was established in 1964 and is responsible “for enforcing federal laws that make it illegal to discriminate against a job applicant or an employee because of the person’s race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, transgender status, and sexual orientation), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information,” according to the agency’s website.

Despite reportedly covering religious discrimination in the workplace, Gustafson noticed that no cases had ever been brought before the commission “to protect somebody who was discriminated against because they had traditional religious beliefs about sexual morality.” Accordingly, she established a “Religious Discrimination Work Group” that investigated the extent to which the EEOC is understood to protect religious freedoms by members of numerous religious bodies.

The group subsequently published a report and accompanying press release on the EEOC’s website on January 13, 2021, Gustafson said. The report detailed that “some participants shared that their members do not view the EEOC as friendly to their religious beliefs.”

Gustafson noted that both the report and press release were removed “shortly after” Biden’s inauguration.

Furthermore, Gustafson related that, in addition to the Work Group’s report being removed, an eight-minute podcast on the group’s findings published February was removed “days later.” She therefore accused Biden of firing her for her stance on religious freedom, suggesting that her “resignation would be followed by similar suppression of [the EEOC’s] work promoting religious freedom.”

Given Gustafson’s suspicion of partisanship in her termination, she proposed that there will be a concomitant “chilling effect to other people at the EEOC,” insofar as “the word gets out, you know, to the public generally that the EEOC is not interested in these types, certain types of religious discrimination claims, and that is to everybody’s loss.”

Andrea Lucas, a Republican-appointed commissioner to the EEOC, excoriated her colleague’s dismissal, calling the action “deeply troubling, a break from long-established norms respected by presidents of both parties, an injection of partisanship where it had been absent, and telling evidence of what ‘unity’ actually means to this President and his Administration.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Protect U.S. election integrity and oppose dangerous H.R. 1
  Show Petition Text
31464 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 35000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

House Democrats, in a strict party-line vote, recently passed legislation to conduct a massive federal overhaul of America’s elections and voting protocols, making the inconsistency, confusion, and funny business that plagued 2020 the new, permanent norm in our country.

The bill is called H.R. 1 (also known, ironically, as the “For the People” Act), and, if passed by the Democrat-controlled Senate, will mark the beginning of a once-in-a-generation transfer of power from the people of our country to its politicians.

That’s we must act NOW, and implore our U.S. Senators to vote against this dangerous legislation when it comes before them for a vote.

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition asking all U.S. Senators to oppose H.R. 1 as a matter of national importance.

Democrat sponsors have attempted to promote H.R. 1 as a bill to expand voting rights in America, but, in reality, it is the exact opposite.

Among the 791-page bill’s provisions are the following:

  • Transfer of control over congressional elections from state governments to the federal government, even though the Constitution explicitly states that such authority belongs solely to states.
  • Automatic voter registration, which would require every state to add all eligible citizens to their voting rolls (unless they manually opt out) under the law. This would, additionally, shield illegal aliens who are automatically registered to vote from prosecution, without making an affirmative declaration about the status of their citizenship.
  • Mandatory early voting in all 50 states for at least 15 days prior to an actual election, as well as unlimited ballot harvesting and a 10-day deadline extension past an election for mail-in ballots to be received and processed.
  • Mandatory, nationwide mail-in voting, without any requirement that individuals provide a form of personal identification upon applying for their mail-in ballot. This would also require that those individuals who request a mail-in ballot be automatically registered to receive mail-in ballots in every election to follow.
  • Transfer of control over drawing congressional district maps from each individual state’s legislature to “independent” commissions – another power reserved, in the Constitution, for states specifically.
  • Federal funding of campaigns, which would use taxpayer dollars to match campaign contributions made by Americans citizens to candidates for federal office at a rate of 600% (you read that right – your money, being used to fund campaigns and candidates you may not support, nor even have the chance to actually to vote for).

And, that's just the tip of the iceberg.

If H.R. 1 passes the Senate and goes to Joe Biden’s desk, the American people may never participate in a free, open, and fair election ever again.

It is, therefore, imperative that we act to save our Republic from this disastrous legislation NOW.

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition which urges all U.S. Senators to oppose the anti-democratic piece of legislation, H.R. 1, today.

And, after signing this petition, please CLICK HERE to DIRECTLY CONTACT your U.S. Senators by using the simple contact form LifeSite is providing, here. It is a simple, one-click process, and you don't even have to look up any of your Senators' contact information.

Thank you!


'Here’s the anti-people agenda of HR 1 on election reform' -

'Democrats’ horrifying ‘For the People’ Act would supercharge vote fraud, end America' -

'The Democrats’ ‘For the People’ Act would make it impossible to hold free and fair elections in America' -

**Photo Credit: Shutterstock

  Hide Petition Text

Republican lawmaker Virginia Foxx, in a press release on the day of Gustafson’s termination, described her dismissal as the “unprecedented firing of an honorable public official.”

“This is a pattern. President Biden calls for the end to ‘partisan warfare,’ only to turn around and demand that Senate-confirmed officials resign so he can make room for his left-wing friends,” she argued, adding that “President Biden should take a note from General Counsel Gustafson, who stuck to her commitment and refused to cave to partisan pressure.”

Gustafson’s short tenure was not received favorably by pro-homosexual and pro-transgender advocates within the EEOC’s ranks.

She faced backlash last year after taking on retail giant Kroger for firing two employees who refused to wear uniforms in support of homosexual and transgender issues. Gustafson said that the women “simply said that because of their religious beliefs they could not celebrate this and so they asked to be permitted to wear aprons that did not include that symbol [the rainbow flag],” which resulted in disciplinary action for the women and their eventual dismissal by the grocery firm.

She explained that “Title 7 [of the Civil Rights Act] doesn’t permit people to require that no one disagrees with them,” adding “[we] all have to sometimes work with people who may not approve of our beliefs.”

“They may not approve of our actions but as Americans, we still have an obligation, a duty to work shoulder to shoulder with each other and to do it in a non-discriminatory, non-harassing way,” she said.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.