Groups led by Mexican bishop again promote abortion, despite Vatican investigation
November 14, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Two “human rights” organizations led by Catholic bishop Raul Vera Lopez are continuing to promote the legalization of abortion in Mexico even after the prelate was questioned by Vatican authorities over the matter in 2011, LifeSiteNews.com has learned.
Vera López, who is bishop of the Diocese of Saltillo in the Mexican state of Coahuila, was investigated by the Vatican last year in response to revelations by LifeSiteNews.com that the bishop was leading two organizations that endorse the legalization of abortion and even advocate its funding and provision by the government, facts that the bishop did not deny in a subsequent LifeSiteNews.com interview.
During a meeting with Vatican officials in September 2011, which was scheduled as a result of the reports, the prelate was reportedly admonished to “clarify” his views on human life and sexuality, although Vera Lopez himself played the meeting down as nothing more than a “dialog.” Over a year later, Vera Lopez has not issued any clarification of his views.
Follow us on Twitter: Follow @LifeSite
A new pro-abortion declaration from Bishop Vera Lopez’s “human rights” groups
LifeSiteNews.com has now learned that Vera Lopez’s two organizations - the Fray Bartolome de las Casas Human Rights Center in the state of Chiapas, and the Fray Juan de Larios Human Rights Center, which is administered directly from Vera Lopez’s own diocesan offices - have their names attached to a new “human rights” report calling again for the legalization of abortion and its provision by the government. It also calls for the elimination of state constitutional amendments protecting the right to life in Mexico.
The document, which was submitted to the United Nations Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination in February of this year, and entitled “Additional information on the situation of discrimination suffered by indigenous peoples in Mexico,” claims on page eight that it is “the obligation of governments to adopt all appropriate means to eliminate discrimination against women in the area of medical attention (...) As various Rapporteurs and Committees of the United Nations have indicated, this means that the States should include the elimination of legal barriers as well as de facto barriers to access to the interruption of pregnancy in safe conditions…”
“In this sense, civil organizations in favor of the rights of women indicate that recent ‘antiabortion’ laws in 18 states are a violation of the right to health and do not permit it to be carried out in its full exercise,” the report continues. “For this reason, the Committee is exhorted to make a pronouncement regarding this and to recommend to Mexico that it eliminate the existing barriers to the access to the legal and safe interruption of pregnancy, in accordance with the recommendations made by the special Rapporteur regarding the right of each person to enjoy the highest possible level of physical and mental health…”
The report was produced by the pro-abortion “All Rights for Everyone” National Network of Human Rights Civil Organizations. This is a coalition of groups of which Vera’s two organizations are members, and which includes numerous other “Catholic” groups that claim to defend human rights as well, including the Jesuit-run Miguel Augustín Pro Júarez Center for Human Rights. They share membership with the pro-abortion “Catholics for the Right to Decide,” which has been repudiated by the Catholic Church for its opposition to Catholic doctrine on the right to life.
The names of Vera’s organizations, in Spanish, appear on pages 24 and 25 of the report as members of the coalition. In addition, the Fray Bartolome de Las Casas Human Rights Center is given special credit for its contribution to the report on page 24.
Bishop Vera Lopez responds with silence
The report’s militantly pro-abortion stance is in perfect agreement with the position on abortion given by the spokesman of the Fray Bartolome de las Casas Human Rights Center, Jorge Armando Gomez, in an interview with LifeSiteNews in August of last year.
“We are in favor of the depenalization of abortion because we are against criminalizing women who opt for that,” said Gomez, who also said that doctors should not be penalized for performing abortions.
“In this sense we say that the government should guarantee the right to health, because quite often abortion is done in Mexico in unhealthy conditions or in hospitals where women aren’t guaranteed a good service.”
“So the government should provide the service in that case?” LifeSiteNews.com asked.
“Yes, in the framework of the right to health, like with many other services such as births, care for when we get sick, in the same way this action of opting to abort should be done in good conditions and life should not be endangered,” Gomez answered.
While researching this article, LifeSiteNews.com again contacted Gomez to ask for his comments on the report bearing his organization’s name. Gomez responded that he cannot give us further interviews, and declined to state that his organization had changed its pro-abortion stance. When this reporter asked Gomez if he could send him the information on the reports to give him an opportunity to respond, Gomez offered the email address of Bishop Vera Lopez himself. However, neither Bishop Vera nor Gomez responded to a written inquiry about the matter.
Marc Cardinal Ouellet, Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops
Palazzo della Congregazioni,
Piazza Pio XII, 10
Phone: (011) 39-06-6988-4217
Fax: (011) 39-06-6988-5303
Gerhard Ludwig Müller, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
Piazza del S. Uffizio, 11, 00193 Roma, Italy
phone: (011) 39-06-6988-3357
phone: (011) 39-06-6988-3413
Fax: (011) 39-06-6988-3409
E-mail: [email protected]
(fax and email are most effective)
‘Little miracles’: Mom gives birth to naturally-conceived quintuplets after refusing ‘selective reduction’
AUSTRALIA, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) -- A 26-year-old Australian mom has given birth to five healthy babies, all conceived naturally, after refusing the doctor’s advice that she must abort three of them in order to give the remaining two a better chance at life.
“After my initial ultrasound I was told I could consider the selection method to give 2 babies the best chance in life,” wrote mom Kim Tucci in a Facebook post last September.
“I watched a YouTube video on the procedure and I cried. I could never do that! Was I selfish for not giving two the chance of 100% survival? All I knew is that I already love them and that every heart beat I heard I connect with them more. For me life starts when a heart starts beating and all I know for sure is that I will do whatever it takes to bring them into this world healthy,” she wrote.
Last Thursday Kim and her husband Vaughn welcomed the five new members into their family — one boy and four girls —increasing the number of their children from 3 to 8. The babies were born at 30 weeks, 10 weeks early, due to insufficient space in Kim’s womb. They weighed on average about 2.5 pounds.
The quintuplets’ story began last March, after Kim and Vaughn had been trying for six months to conceive just one more child for their family. Due to health complications, Kim wondered if she would ever become a mother again.
After what she thought was an extra long cycle, she decided to take a pregnancy test.
“I was feeling tired and a little nauseated and thought I would take a pregnancy test just to get the ‘what if’ out of my head. To my shock and utter excitement it was positive,” she wrote on a Facebook post.
The parents got the shock of their lives when doctors confirmed in an ultrasound examination that there was not one baby, but five.
“After a long wait for the ultrasound we finally went in. The sonographer told me there were multiple gestational sacks, but she could only see a heart beat in two. I was so excited! Twins!”
“I was moved to another machine for a clearer view and had the head doctor come in and double check the findings. She started to count, one, two, three, four, five. Did i hear that correctly? Five? My legs start to shake uncontrollably and all i can do is laugh. The sonographer then told me the term for five is ‘quintuplets,’” Kim wrote.
Even though Kim began to feel stretched to the limit with all those human lives growing inside her, she chose to focus on her babies, and not herself, referring to them as “my five little miracles.”
“It's getting harder as each day passes to push through the pain, every part of my body aches and sleeping is becoming very painful. No amount of pillows are helping support my back and belly. Sometimes I get so upset that I just want to throw my hands up and give in.”
“Sometimes my pelvis becomes so stiff I can barely walk and my hips feel like they are grinding away constantly. I'm finding it hard to eat as I basically have no room left in my stomach, and the way it is positioned it's pushed all the way back with the babies leaning against it.”
“My skin on my belly is so stretched its painful and hot to touch. It literally feels like I have hives! No amount of cream helps relieve the discomfort. I have a lot of stretch marks now. Dealing with such a huge change in my body is hard.”
“Is it all worth it? Yes!!!! I will keep pushing through,” she wrote in one Facebook post days before the babies were born.
The newborns' names are Keith, Ali, Penelope, Tiffany, and Beatrix. They were born at King Edward Memorial Hospital in Subiaco, Western Australia. Mother and babies are reported to be doing well.
UN rights chief tells Catholic countries to legalize abortion over Zika virus: bishops and cardinal react
GENEVA, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) -- The United Nations, following the lead of international abortion activists, is now urging Latin American countries hit by the mosquito-borne Zika virus to lift restrictions on abortion for pregnant women who have contacted the virus and whose pre-born children may be at risk for birth defects, including having smaller than normal heads.
The UN human rights office said today that it is not enough for South American countries to urge women to postpone pregnancy without also offering them abortion as a final solution.
“How can they ask these women not to become pregnant, but not offer… the possibility to stop their pregnancies?” UN spokeswoman Cecile Pouilly told reporters.
UN human rights chief Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein said that governments should make available contraception and abortion services.
“Laws and policies that restrict (women’s) access to these services must be urgently reviewed in line with human rights obligations in order to ensure the right to health for all in practice,” he said.
But Brazil’s bishops strongly asserted yesterday that efforts should be made to eradicate the virus, not the people who may be infected by it.
The disease is “no justification whatsoever to promote abortion,” they said in a statement, adding that it is not morally acceptable to promote abortion “in the cases of microcephaly, as, unfortunately, some groups are proposing to the Supreme Federal Court, in a total lack of respect for the gift of life.”
Honduras Cardinal Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga has also come out strongly against the notion of “therapeutic abortions” as a response to the problem. Unlike Brazil where abortion is legal in the case of rape or health of the mother, abortion remains entirely illegal in Honduras.
“We should never talk about ‘therapeutic’ abortion,” the cardinal said in a homily at a February 3 Mass in Suyap. “Therapeutic abortion doesn’t exist. Therapeutic means curing, and abortion cures nothing. It takes innocent lives,” he said.
While the World Health Organization (WHO) declared an international public health emergency February 1 on account of concerns over the virus, critics have pointed out, however, that not one death as resulted from the virus. Even on WHO’s own website the virus is described in mild terms.
“It causes mild fever and rash. Other symptoms include muscle pain, joint pain, headache, pain behind the eyes and conjunctivitis. Zika virus disease is usually mild, with symptoms lasting only a few days,” the website states. “To date, there have been no reported deaths associated with Zika virus,” it added.
Critics suspect that the crisis is being manipulated to advance an anti-human agenda on the pre-born.
“Is Zika, actually, a hideous virus that threatens to spread uncontrollably across the world creating an army of disabled children with tiny heads and low IQ’s? Or might this be a willful misinterpretation of the scarce data to manipulate public opinion and legislatures?” wrote pro-life critic Mei-Li Garcia earlier this week.
“It becomes very clear that the publicity surrounding this story has a very little to do with medicine and a lot to do with a convenient crisis that is being used by those pushing for the legalization of abortion around the world,” she wrote.
Hillary’s litmus test for Supreme Court picks: They must ‘preserve Roe v. Wade’
DERRY, NH, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) - Hillary Clinton has a litmus test for Supreme Court nominees - several, in fact. At a Democratic event on Wednesday, Clinton unveiled her criteria in selecting a judge for the nation's highest court.
“I do have a litmus test, I have a bunch of litmus tests," she said.
"We’ve got to make sure to preserve Roe v. Wade, not let it be nibbled away or repealed,” she said.
That echoes her recent call to arms speech before Planned Parenthood last month, when she stated that taxpayers must fund abortion-on-demand in order to uphold the "right" of choice.
“We have to preserve marriage equality,” Clinton said, referring to last summer's Obergefell v. Hodges case, a 5-4 ruling that redefined marriage nationwide. “We have to go further to end discrimination against the LGBT community."
Her views differentiate her from the Republican front runners. Ted Cruz has called the court's marriage ruling "fundamentally illegitimate," and Donald Trump told Fox News Sunday this week that he would "be very strong on putting certain judges on the bench that I think maybe could change things." Marco Rubio has said he won't "concede" the issue to the one-vote majority.
All Republican presidential hopefuls say they are pro-life and will defund Planned Parenthood.
Her husband, Bill Clinton, raised the makeup of the Supreme Court early last month in New Hampshire, saying it receives "almost no attention" as a campaign issue.
On Wednesday, Hillary said "the next president could get as many as three appointments. It’s one of the many reasons why we can’t turn the White House over to the Republicans again.”
Clinton said her judicial appointees must also reverse the Citizens United ruling on campaign finance and oppose a recent decision striking down a portion of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. In 2013's Shelby County v. Holder, justices struck down Section 4(b) of the act, which said that certain states and jurisdictions had to obtain permission from the federal government before changing their voting laws.
At one time, most politicians frowned upon any "litmus test" for judicial nominees, emphasizing the independence of the third branch of government. "I don't believe in litmus tests," Jeb Bush told Chuck Todd last November.
But with the rise of an activist judiciary in the middle of the 20th century, constitutionalists have sought to rein in the power of the bench.