Featured Image
Hilary Clinton while participating in an online event on September 26, 2020Getty Images

LifeSiteNews has been permanently banned on YouTube. Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library.

May 20, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton provoked some sharp responses to a Monday tweet which suggested the lifting of government restrictions for the stated purpose of mitigating the COVID-19 virus would only happen with mass reception of experimental COVID-19 gene-therapy vaccination.

“It's pretty simple: Get vaccinated. Get your life back,” wrote the twice-failed Democratic presidential candidate. She also shared the link and phone number to, which is set up with U.S. tax dollars to help facilitate the mass injection of these experimental biological agents into the arms of hundreds of millions of Americans.

Respondents seemed to recognize a suggestion of coercion on the part of Clinton and the Democratic Party, which has imposed decidedly more aggressive unconstitutional violations of freedom over the last 14 months than their Republican counterparts.

“Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you, the Democrat Party,” wrote one Twitter respondent. Others emphasized the implied attempt at coercion: “This seems like a threat,” “Sounds like a hostage situation to me,” “This is called extortion,” and “They're not even attempting to veil their threats.”

Since the post-World War II era, internationally recognized ethics affirm, in the strongest terms, the immorality of coercing anyone to receive an experimental medical treatment. All of the current coronavirus vaccines remain officially classified as experimental by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

In referencing the Nuremberg Code of 1947, among other treaties, Dr. Michael Yeadon, Pfizer’s former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory, summarized:

It is illegal under various international treaties, to coerce somebody to receive a medical treatment. And it derives from the trials following the defeat of Nazi Germany where Josef Mengele, and other people, performed experiments on living humans who were of course not volunteers, sometimes killing them. And this is a faint echo of that.

Indeed, Dr. Joseph Meaney, president of the National Catholic Bioethics Center, affirms that informed consent is not even possible for these new vaccines since long-term effects remain unknown due to the lack of extended testing. Thus, any use of coercion of persons to take such a vaccine remains “ethically unacceptable.”

The motivation behind the coercive, heavy-handed experimental vaccine drive, including mask mandates, lockdowns, and the suppression of civil rights, remains an enigma due to the fact that for those under 70, COVID-19 remains less of a threat than influenza.

And consulting the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), which for many reasons may be significantly overestimating COVID-19 fatalities, one finds their “best estimate” of COVID-19 survival rates to be: 99.997% for those under 20 years of age, 99.98% for those between 20 and 50 years old, 99.5% from fifty to seventy, and 94.6% for those over seventy years. 

Thus, as affirmed several weeks ago by eminent doctor Peter McCullough, M.D., “[For] people under 50 who fundamentally have no health risks, there’s no scientific rationale for them to ever become vaccinated” against COVID-19.

In addition, McCullough spoke to the continually rising levels of herd immunity due to natural infection which he stated was “right now (in Texas), with no vaccine effect, 80 percent.” 

“People who develop COVID have complete and durable immunity,” he said. “And (that’s) a very important principle: complete and durable. You can't beat natural immunity. You can't vaccinate on top of it and make it better. There's no scientific, clinical or safety rationale for ever vaccinating a COVID-recovered patient. There's no rationale for ever testing a COVID-recovered patient.”

And though such information is aggressively suppressed, inexpensive, safe, and very effective treatments are available for COVID-19. Early treatment with hydroxychloroquine, zinc, an anti-biotic, and vitamins is one such option with a phenomenal track record. Another such treatment which is hailed as nothing less than “miraculous” is the use of ivermectin, which is said to “obliterate transmission of this virus.” 

READ: Biden tells Americans to ‘get vaccinated or wear a mask until you do’

Since these experimental vaccines have been in use, data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reveals 192,954 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines, including 4,057 deaths and 17,190 serious injuries between December 14, 2020 and May 7, 2021.

It remains a concern that these figures are just “the tip of the iceberg,” as a “2010 Harvard-executed study commissioned by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) revealed that reported vaccine injuries to VAERS represent an estimated 1% of actual injuries.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Say 'No' to COVID 'Vaccine Passports'!
  Show Petition Text
217389 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 225000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Powerful nations of the world, including China, the UK, and Canada are discussing plans to require so-called 'vaccine passports' as a condition for travel, and possibly to restrict entry to shopping and entertainment venues.

Israel has already put in place a system to discriminate against those who choose not to take the COVID vaccine, and, in the United States, Joe Biden has signed a new executive order which could pave the way for the implementation of a 'vaccine passport' system. [See more below.]

This kind of medical dictatorship must be resisted, and therefore, we must act quickly before these authoritarian notions take root and spread!

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition to SAY NO to government 'vaccine passports.' Tell your legislators to respect your freedom not to vaccinate without fear of repercussion.

People should not have to live in fear of government retribution for refusing a vaccine which is being rushed to market by Big Pharma and their fellow-travelers in NGOs, like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

It would be intolerable and immoral for the government to coerce someone, and their family, to take a COVID vaccine against their will just so they can do their weekly grocery shopping, go to a high school soccer game, travel on public transport, or visit their relatives who live in a different part of the country, or overseas.

Medical freedom must be respected in principle and also in practice.

So, it is now time that our policy-makers listen to all voices involved in this vital conversation, and start to represent those who will not tolerate being punished, restricted, or tracked for refusing an experimental vaccine.

Simply put, legislatures must begin to act as legislatures again.

Questions must be asked. Hearings and investigations must be held. And, the legislatures of each state and country must return to the business of representing the people who voted for them, assuming their rightful place as the originator of legislation.

We will no longer accept the dictates of executive branches without question. And, neither can we accept the dictates of some doctors who seem detached from reality and from science.

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition which asks national political leaders (as well as state and provincial legislators in the U.S. and Canada) to pledge to respect the rights of those who refuse a COVID vaccine, and NOT introduce 'vaccine passports,' or any other system which would discriminate on the basis of taking the COVID vaccine.


'Biden executive order directs government to evaluate ‘feasibility’ of vaccine passports' -

'China lobbies WHO to develop COVID vaccine passports for all nations' -

'UK advances plans for vaccine passports to travel, enter stores' -

'Canada’s health minister: Gov’t ‘working on the idea of vaccine passports’' -

'European Commission president plans to introduce vaccine passports' -

'Israel’s ‘Green Passport’ vaccination program has created a ‘medical Apartheid,’ distraught citizens say' -

'LA schools to track every kid using Microsoft’s ‘Daily Pass’ COVID app' -

  Hide Petition Text

Also of relevance is the fact that in response to only 40 sudden deaths and several hundred reports of Guillian Barre syndrome, the U.S. government suspended its swine flu vaccine campaign after just ten weeks in 1976. There appears to be no consideration for such a move now in regard to these current experimental agents, despite a death toll at least 101 times higher.

Due to the risks mentioned above, and numerous other reasons, many doctors strongly advise against the reception of these experimental biological agents, concluding that they are “not safer” than the China virus itself. 

Touching upon the incongruity between the stated motivations for massive vaccination and the logical facts which contradict them, another responder to Clinton drew a rational conclusion: “And there ladies and gentlemen is the problem… Summed up in one tweet, it's not about cases or deaths, it's about a ‘vaccine.’”


Biden tells Americans to ‘get vaccinated or wear a mask until you do’

US doctors propose ‘Vaccine Bill of Rights’ to protect citizens from forced shots

160+ experts slam COVID vaccines as ‘unnecessary, ineffective and unsafe’ in powerful letter

The Leprechaun has no clothes: Notre Dame violates the Nuremberg Code of 1947

EXCLUSIVE – Former Pfizer VP: ‘Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death.

Dr. Peter McCullough: given an 80% level of herd immunity, broad vaccination has ‘no scientific, clinical or safety rationale.’

‘Miraculous’ ivermectin approved for use in the US for the treatment of COVID-19