News
Featured Image
When Christina held Rachael for the first time, she was overwhelmed with joy.

HILLSDALE, Michigan (LifeSiteNews) — The tiny Michigan town of Hillsdale, home of well-known conservative liberal arts university Hillsdale College, may soon become the nation’s 34th sanctuary city for the unborn.

According to reporting by MLive, the Hillsdale City Council of the college town, which boasts a population just over 8,000, is considering passing an ordinance to declare Hillsdale a “sanctuary for the unborn,” imposing a broad spectrum of restrictions on abortions within city limits.

MLive reported that the ordinance, which was presented at Hillsdale’s city council meeting August 2, “would immediately outlaw any person from doing abortions or providing abortion-inducing drugs at any stage of pregnancy in the city.”

Violators would be subject to a $500 fine and 90 days in jail, with each violation constituting a separate offense.

As reported by MLive, State Rep. Andrew Fink (R-MI), representing Michigan’s Branch and Hillsdale counties, issued a statement on July 30 supporting Hillsdale’s effort to protect the unborn.

“I commend the members of the Hillsdale City Council for taking up this issue to defend the lives of the unborn and encourage them to adopt this ordinance that reflects the crucial values of the local citizens they represent,” Fink said.

— Article continues below Petition —
URGENT PETITION: Tell the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade
  Show Petition Text
61037 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 70000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

PETITION UPDATE (9/26/2020):

With President Trump's nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court left by the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, we are closer than we have been in decades to seeing Roe vs. Wade overturned.

We now encourage the Senate to confirm Barrett as the next Associate Justice of the Supreme Court.

Judge Barrett has a fantastic track recond on sanctity of life issues, has seven children, and is a devout believer. She is the perfect remedy for Ruth Bader Ginsburg's radical pro-abortionism.

Please READ the full story here: 'BREAKING: Trump nominates Catholic mom of 7 Judge Amy Coney Barrett to Supreme Court'

And then, please SIGN this petition telling the High Court that it's now time to end the activist Roe vs. Wade judgment. Thank you!

__________________________________________________________________

PETITION UPDATE (6/29/2020):

In a decision which has imperiled more abortion-minded women, sentenced more preborn to death, and upset pro-lifers across the nation,the United States Supreme Court decided 5-4 to strike down a Louisiana law requiring basic medical precautions in the event of abortion complications, with Chief Justice John Roberts reversing his own past decision to uphold a similar Texas law.

Liberal Justice Stephen Breyer wrote the majority opinion, which held that the Louisiana law was unconstitutional for the simple fact that it was “almost word-for-word identical” to the Texas one the court already struck down in 2016.

In his concurring opinion, Chief Justice Roberts acknowledged that he had “joined the dissent in Whole Woman’s Health and continue to believe that the case was wrongly decided. The question today however is not whether Whole Woman’s Health was right or wrong, but whether to adhere to it in deciding the present case.”

We call on the Supreme Court to stop supporting the culture of death and overturn Roe vs Wade, now.

PETITION UPDATE (1/20/2020):

Hundreds of thousands of people will gather in Washington, D.C., this coming Friday, January 24th, for the March for Life. They will be praying for an end to Roe vs Wade, as the Supreme Court will hear a crucial, abortion-related case later this year in March. United our voices can change the course of history. Sign this petition TODAY! (LEARN MORE BELOW)

PETITION UPDATE (1/3/2020):

In advance of the Supreme Court's hearing arguments in an important abortion case later this year in March, 207 U.S. Senators and Representatives have signed amicus briefs supporting a Louisiana law requiring abortionists to have admitting privileges at a hospital nearby an abortion center.

Some of these supporting briefs also suggest that now is the time to reconsider Roe vs Wade as sound law.

Please SIGN this petition, calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down Roe vs Wade.

_____________________________________________________________________________

More than 60 million Americans have been slaughtered in their mother's wombs as a result of Roe v. Wade. This activist, unconstitutional ruling in 1973 has left countless women emotionally and psychologically scarred. 

It was believed by many that Roe would be overturned in 1992 with Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Despite having eight Republican-appointed judges at the time, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to uphold it. 

Since then, major gains have been made in the fight for life, and many lives have been saved. 

However, Roe v. Wade remains the law of the land, leaving millions of defenseless pre-born children vulnerable to murder.

According to a 2016 study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 35% of aborted babies are African American, despite black women only making up six percent of the U.S. population. 19% of aborted babies are Hispanic.

We thus again call on the court to do everything they can to end Roe vs Wade.

Now is the time for pro-lifers to join together and ensure that all of God's children have a right to life.

Roe v. Wade must come to an end!

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/supreme-court-strikes-down-louisiana-abortion-regulations

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/over-200-congressmen-as-us-supreme-court-to-reconsider-roe-v-wade

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/congress-members-file-competing-legal-briefs-in-key-scotus-abortion-case

  Hide Petition Text

“The premise of this measure is simple: no longer would abortion procedures or abortion-inducing drugs be legal within the city bounds of Hillsdale,” the statement continued.

“Our area is deeply rooted in family values and our people are longstanding defenders of the sanctity of life and the right to life that every U.S. citizen is entitled [to], including those still in the womb.”

Under the ordinance it would be illegal to “knowingly aid in an abortion, including providing transportation to an abortion provider, providing instructions or providing payment or insurance toward the abortion,” MLive reported.

33 other towns, predominantly in Texas, have become sanctuaries for the unborn ahead of Hillsdale, criminalizing abortion within city limits and even empowering family members to seek restitution if a child in the family is killed through abortion.

For example, in Lubbock, Texas, which became the state’s 24th sanctuary city, relatives of an aborted child are permitted to sue for compensatory or punitive damages. In addition, any private citizen is authorized to file a lawsuit seeking injunctive relief or statutory damages.

The Hillsdale provision would be similar, granting private citizens the ability to file civil lawsuits against violators of the ordinance.

Exemptions to the ordinance, according to the report, include “if the procedure is done as part of an accidental miscarriage, to remove an ectopic pregnancy or if the mother’s life is at risk due to the pregnancy.”

A section of Hillsdale’s pro-life ordinance would also seek to forbid residents of Hillsdale from obtaining an abortion even outside of city limits. But as MLive noted, the section would not be enforceable unless Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, two landmark Supreme Court decisions which established a precedent for legalized abortion throughout the United States, are overturned by the Supreme Court.

A reversal of court precedent legalizing abortion at the federal level is possible by next year.

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, with a decision expected by next summer. The case is expected to address the legality of the current precedent for legalized abortion, and a deluge of amicus briefs have called upon the Court to immediately overturn both Roe and Casey.

In late July Mississippi made headlines by explicitly asking the Supreme Court to overturn the prior rulings. As of last week about 230 GOP lawmakers have joined in the call to throw out the previous rulings.

Pro-life and pro-abortion advocates alike have recognized the case as having the potential to overturn existing abortion precedent, allowing states to outlaw abortion.

Some governments have already pivoted in anticipation of an outcome favorable to pro-life policy.

In Texas, Gov. Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1280 earlier this year, which would outlaw all abortions in the state within 30 days of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade.

The bill would “amend the Health and Safety Code to create the criminal offense of prohibited abortion,” making it a crime to perform any abortion.

Under the Texas law, “knowingly performing a partial-birth abortion or intentionally performing a dismemberment abortion unless in a medical emergency is punishable as a state jail felony.”

As noted in the text of the legislation, “[a] first degree felony is punishable by confinement in prison for life or a term from 5 to 99 years and a second degree felony is punishable by confinement in prison for a term from 2 to 20 years.”

WTVB reports that Hillsdale’s ordinance to make the town a “sanctuary for the unborn” has been sent to the Council’s Operations and Governance Committee for further review following Monday’s three-hour-long meeting.

LifeSiteNews has been permanently banned on YouTube. Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.