News
Featured Image
Vice-President of the Honduran Parliament Mario PérezConfidencial Honduras / YouTube

Big Tech is censoring us. Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news.  Subscribe now.

January 27, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – The Congress of Honduras has voted to enact a “constitutional lock” to make it nearly impossible for any future government to try and overturn the central American nation’s decades-long ban on abortion. 

Last Thursday, the Congress of Honduras voted 88 to 28 to require a three-quarters majority of congress to allow articles of its constitution to be changed, which currently protects the unborn. 

All abortions, including in a case of rape or incest, have been illegal in Honduras since 1982. Currently, Article 67 of the Honduran Constitution states that “the unborn will be considered born for everything that favors within the limits of the law.” 

The new “Shield Against Abortion in Honduras” bill will enshrine in the Honduran constitution the illegality of abortion, saying “it is considered prohibited and illegal by the mother or a third party to practice any kind of interruption of a life that is about to be born.” 

The bill will also apply to the Honduran law that recognizes marriage as between a man and a woman. 

The bill was brought forth on January 11 by the Vice-President of the Honduran Parliament Mario Pérez, who is part of the ruling National Party of President Juan Orlando Hernandez.

Honduras’s new pro-life bill comes only weeks after the Senate of Argentina in December 2020 passed a law allowing abortion in the first 14 weeks of pregnancy. 

According to Pérez, the new law was brought forth in response to the push for legalizing abortion in other Latin American nations such as Argentina. 

“This reform arises from the wave of constitutional reforms in Latin American countries, promoted by leftist governments led to legalize abortion, as happened in Argentina recently, and that cannot be allowed in Honduras,” said Pérez prior to the vote. 

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Keep abortion out of the Smithsonian!
  Show Petition Text
2526 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 4000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Congress's huge omnibus spending bill, attached to the COVID relief bill, funds a new 'Women's History' museum for the Smithsonian Institution.

And, while it is debatable whether or not "equality" demands a whole museum dedicated to women's accomplishments as distinct from those of men, what is not debatable is the potential for using this new museum as a platform for the promotion of abortion.

Please SIGN this petition demanding that the new 'Women's History' museum will not now, or ever, promote abortion in any of its exhibits or programs.

But, why is this even a question?

Because, House Bill HR 1980, which authorized the building of a women's museum on the Mall in Washington, D.C., and which passed the House by wide margins in February, 2020, states that curators will take steps to ensure "diversity of political viewpoints in exhibits and programs."

This is a bad sign, one which could lead to the promotion of abortion as a "political viewpoint."

Therefore, we must remind the curators of the Smithsonian, the Congress and the President that abortion is not a "political viewpoint." Abortion is, rather, the barbaric killing of an innocent human being and a personal tragedy for the mother and others involved.

And, it is also a national tragedy - not something which can be reduced to "civil discourse," as there is nothing "civil" about abortion.

As such, abortion should never be promoted, and especially never by any agency or museum receiving federal funding.

This petition is being CC'ed to the Congress and the President so that if this museum ever starts to promote abortion, they can intervene to stop funding the museum or the Smithsonian.

Please SIGN and SHARE this important pro-life petition today, and keep abortion out of the Smithsonian!

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

'Congressman asks Smithsonian to remove bust of Planned Parenthood’s racist founder' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/congressman-asks-smithsonian-to-remove-bust-of-planned-parenthoods-racist-founder

'House passes bill to build women’s history museum on National Mall' - https://www.archpaper.com/2020/02/house-passes-womens-history-museum-bill/

  Hide Petition Text

“The National Party is pro-life and will vote in favor of this reform that represents a lock on the legalization of abortion; and whoever does not want it and wants the death of a baby in the mother's womb approved, will vote against it.” 

During a virtual floor debate of the bill, Pérez said that the bill will enact a “constitutional lock” which will stop any future meddling or liberalization of the nation’s current pro-life laws protecting the unborn. 

According to a BBC report, Pérez said that “every human being has the right to life from the moment of conception.”

Before the bill officially becomes law, it needs another ratification from Congress which is expected to happen this week.

According to the Honduran Congress website, the support for the bill came from those in parties other than the ruling National Party. 

“As a woman and a mother, I am in favor of life and against abortion, I want to speak on behalf of those who are in the mother's womb and cannot be opposed,” stated Gloria Bonilla of the Liberal Party. 

I was struck by the fact that this issue was hardly beginning to be heard in the media, I began to receive calls from medical industries asking me to vote against, companies that I didn't even know, that's why today I say that I always go to vote in favor of life, even if that means that I will not be elected deputy again, but I will not contradict my principles,” said Luis Redondo of the PINU party.

Francisco Rivera of the National Party said: “As a representative of my department in Olancho,” she knew that “putting the lock on this reform so that a qualified majority is needed is the right thing to do, and I vote in favor of the initiative.”

Abortion activist groups in the nation called the move an “abysmal step backwards.” 

“Women will continue having unsafe abortions,” said Cristina Alvarado of the Women for Peace. “We’re on our own.”

Many politicians of Latin American countries blasted the legalization of abortion in Argentina after it was enacted in late 2020. 

The President of Brazil, Jair Bolsonaro, came out strongly against pro-abortion laws, saying on Twitter: “I deeply regret the lives of Argentine children, now subject to being cut from their mothers' wombs with the consent of the state. As far as it depends on me and my government, abortion will never be approved on our soil. We will always fight to protect the lives of the innocent!”

Mexico’s President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador has declined to entertain the idea of legalizing abortion via Mexico’s Congress. The day after Argentina legalized abortion, Obrador said abortion is “a decision for women” and a national referendum should be the only way for the nation to decide if it ever becomes legal. 

In Mexico, abortion is allowed in Mexico City and the state of Oaxaca, but most Mexican states have enacted laws protecting the unborn. 

In a recent pro-life Mexican victory, the Mexican Supreme Court ruled against legalizing abortion in a 4-1 vote. 

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.