News
Featured Image
Alisa CampauPhoto provided by We the Patriots USA

You’re invited! Join LifeSite in celebrating 25 years of pro-life and pro-family reporting at our anniversary Gala August 17th in Naples, Florida. Tickets and sponsorships can be purchased by clicking here. 

GRAND RAPIDS, Michigan (LifeSiteNews) — Michigan mom Jenna Campau, who filed a federal lawsuit against a hospital for allegedly denying her daughter crucial medical treatment due to her COVID-19 vaccination status, scored a resounding legal and medical victory.

Jenna, the adoptive mother of then-17-year-old Ukrainian girl Alisa, had decided to pursue legal action against Spectrum Health and Helen Devos Children’s Hospital in Grand Rapids, Michigan earlier this year, LifeSiteNews previously reported.

The move came after the hospital had allegedly refused to put Alisa on the wait list for a kidney transplant because she was not vaccinated against the coronavirus. The family has chosen not to receive the abortion-tainted COVID-19 shots due to religious objections.

READ: Michigan family sues hospital for requiring daughter to get COVID jab before getting kidney transplant

With the clock running down and Alisa in urgent need of a transplant, Jenna Campau reached out to We the Patriots USA, a nonprofit that helps raise funds and connect people with legal representation to help them fight discrimination and the violation of their fundamental rights.

We the Patriots USA then connected the Campau family with a team of attorneys, who filed a federal lawsuit in the Western District of Michigan on May 13, naming Jenna Campau as the plaintiff.

The hospital has now reversed course, allowing Alisa to start her medical evaluations without requiring her to get the jab.

“As soon as we filed, everything changed for Jenna Campau and her daughter Alisa,” We the Patriots USA co-founder and vice president Brian Festa told LifeSiteNews in a phone interview Thursday.

“Suddenly, whereas before they hadn’t been willing to have her go through any of the evaluations necessary for the transplant, suddenly they were calling her up and scheduling her for all of the evaluations,” he said.

In a statement, Jenna Campau expressed gratitude for “the quick and laser-focused help we received from We the Patriots USA when we reached out for legal assistance.”

“We are convinced that their facilitation of legal defense was absolutely the reason that Alisa has now received the medical evaluations that were previously denied,” she said, adding that “Given these new developments, and after prayerful consideration, we have decided to withdraw our lawsuit against the hospital.”

“They are very, very religious people,” Festa told LifeSite, adding that the family “prayed on this, and they felt that the best option was to withdraw the litigation” since “the doors were being opened” to move ahead with the kidney transplant process.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Stop Tedros' WHO Pandemic Treaty
  Show Petition Text
100900 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 125000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The WHO Pandemic Treaty looks set to be one of the biggest power-grabs in living memory, with unelected globalists seeking the power to declare pandemics, and then control your country's response. 

But it's not too late to do something about it. 

SIGN and SHARE this special petition telling Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus that the WHO will never usurp your nation's sovereignty.

The past two years have been rife with infringements on personal liberties and civil rights by national governments, but now the World Health Organization is seeking to appropriate those same abusive powers to itself at a global level. 

194 member states representing 99% of the world's population are expected to sign pandemic treaties with the WHO that would allow Tedros, or any future Director General, to dictate exactly how your nation would respond to a new disease outbreak which they consider a pandemic.

This attack on national sovereignty will come as no surprise to those who for years have listened to elites like Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates discussing their vision for the centralization of power into globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), the WHO and the rest of the United Nations. 

SIGN this petition against the WHO's Pandemic Treaty, before it's too late.

Ludicrously, 20 world leaders calling for the treaty, including Tedros, Boris Johnson and Emmanuel Macron, compared the post-Covid world to the post-WWII period, saying similar co-operation is now needed to "dispel the temptations of isolationism and nationalism, and to address the challenges that could only be achieved together in the spirit of solidarity and co-operation - namely peace, prosperity, health and security."

Australian PM Scott Morrison is the latest leader to express support for a “pandemic treaty”.

The stated intention of the WHO is to “kickstart a global process to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.”

The wheels are already in motion, with the Biden administration officially proposing the initial steps towards handing global pandemic control to the WHO. 

Biden's representatives have submitted amendments to the WHO's International Health Regulations (IHR), which would give the Director General the right to declare health emergencies in any nation, even when disputed by the country in question.

These amendments, which would be legally binding under international law, will be voted on by the World Health Assembly (the governing body of the WHO) at a special convention running from May 22-28 and set the stage for a fully-fledged pandemic treaty to be passed. 

SIGN and SHARE the petition telling the WHO that you won't accept any pandemic treaty

The ball has been rolling since the last World Health Assembly meeting in December, where the United States launched negotiations "on a new international health instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response," a U.S. statement read. 

"This momentous step represents our collective responsibility to work together to advance health security and to make the global health system stronger and more responsive. 

"We look forward to broad and deep negotiations using a whole-of-society and whole-of-government approach that will strengthen the international legal framework for public health/pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response and enable us to address issues of equity, accountability, and multisectoral collaboration evident in the COVID-19 pandemic. 

"We know it will take all of us working together across governments, private sector, philanthropy, academia, and civil society to make rapid progress towards a long-term solution for these complex problems," the U.S. statement added.

SIGN the petition today to show the WHO that you won't accept this attack on national sovereignty.

These are precarious times in which freedom and self-determination must be defended from those who would ride rough-shod over your civil rights. 

We do not want to go back to global lockdowns, vaccine mandates and propoganda.

Sign the petition - speak up now!

For More Information:

Biden hands over American sovereignty with proposed WHO treaty - LifeSiteNews

Pandemic Treaty is a backdoor to global governance - LifeSiteNews

Dr. Robert Malone on the WHO's power-grab - LifeSiteNews

**Photo: YouTube Screenshot**

  Hide Petition Text

It’s unclear whether the family will ultimately decide to pursue treatment through Helen Devos Children’s Hospital after their legal victory.

Festa told LifeSite the federal lawsuit and resulting publicity have opened up a swath of new opportunities that could perhaps suit the family better.

Since the family filed their lawsuit in May, Festa said doctors have reached out to offer to perform the operation without requiring Alisa to get the COVID jab, and some people have even offered to donate their own kidneys.

“She’s got other options,” Festa explained, adding that “Quite frankly, I’m not sure that she would want to” continue working with Helen Devos after “the way they treated her,” since “there are places who are much more accommodating and respectful of her religious belief.”

RELATED: Wisconsin hospital accused of refusing to resuscitate unvaccinated Down syndrome patient
Festa told LifeSite his organization feels “very strongly that the reason that doors were opened to Alisa in this case is because we took legal action, because our donors stepped up, and our supporters stepped up for Alisa.”

He said Jenna and Alisa’s case “sets an important precedent that hospitals and doctors cannot deny life-saving, critical care simply because someone has refused a shot, especially when that refusal is on the basis of one’s sincerely-held religious beliefs.”

“So, what we’re hoping is that other hospitals take notice, other doctors take notice, and just know that we’re watching,” he added, noting that it’s “really dangerous” to allow doctors to deny life-saving care simply because a patient refused to get their “fifth COVID booster.”

Festa said anyone who has been denied medical care due to their religious beliefs can reach out to We the Patriots USA for help, noting that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 affirms that public accommodations, including hospitals, cannot deny services on the basis of religious beliefs.

Those interested in following legal updates from We the Patriots USA can visit the organization’s Telegram channel at t.me/wethepatriotsusa.

Help Jenny Porter recover from her vaccine injury: LifeFunder

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

4 Comments

    Loading...