Featured Image

Congress' Republican majority is taking its first step in sending pro-life legislation to the desk of President Obama.

According to Politico, the House has timed a vote on the Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act to take place on January 22, the 42nd anniversary of Roe v. Wade. The vote will coincide with the arrival of at least 300,000 pro-life Americans who are expected to brave the cold at the annual March for Life.

The Senate, which has returned to regular order under new Republican Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, is expected to vote on the measure in the spring. Two Senate staffers told LifeSiteNews last week that a 20-week ban is expected to get through the Judiciary Committee and be a priority of the upper chamber's Republican majority.

President Obama has threatened to veto the bill, but whether he will need to is still an open question. Republicans will need at least six Democrats to join them in supporting the bill, and possibly more if as many as four Republican Senators do not support the ban, to overcome a filibuster.

Polls show that a majority of Americans support the late-term ban — which includes exceptions for life of the mother, rape, and incest — and at least eight possible 2016 GOP presidential candidates have publicly stood with the ban. If made into law, as many as 18,000 unborn children could be saved from abortion.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.