LifeSiteNews has been permanently banned on YouTube. Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library.
VILLA HILLS, Kentucky, March 9, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – Following reports of three nuns from the Benedictine Sisters of St. Walburg in Kentucky dying shortly after receiving their first shot of the mRNA-developed COVID-19 vaccine, a physician and immunologist reached out to the community to warn of the dangers of going ahead with their planned second dose in May.
Dr. Hooman Noorchashm is an American medical doctor and immunologist who advocates for ethics in health care. Before losing his wife, also a doctor, to cancer, Noorchashm successfully fought to have a dangerous surgical tool, called a power morcellator, heavily restricted in its usage. The tool is used to grind up tissue for easier removal, but when applied to cancerous tissue it was found to spread the cancer throughout some patient’s bodies, as was the case with Noorchashm’s wife.
Noorchashm and his wife were able to convince the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2014 to recommend the tool not be used in “the vast majority” of surgeries on women with uterine tumors.
After reading of the Kentucky sisters’ plight with COVID-19 vaccines last month, Noorchashm felt “duty bound as a physician-immunologist” to share with them his “high level of concern and alarm” for their safety. Noorchashm characterized the mRNA-developed Pfizer and Moderna vaccines as “a large-scale public health risk,” which he believes is “directly affecting” the Monastery of St. Walburg community.
Sharing his expertise, the Pennsylvania-based doctor noted the temporal connection between the outbreak of COVID-19 at the monastery and the vaccine regimen implemented there just days before, calling it a “mistake” to assume this sequence of events “was simply a coincidence.”
Noorchashm has previously written to the FDA and Pfizer about the dangers arising from administering the currently available mRNA vaccines to persons who are recovering from COVID-19 or who carry the virus asymptomatically. In his professional study of the conditions arising from COVID-19 exposure, “it is a matter of certainty that viral antigens are present in the endothelial lining of blood vessels in all persons with active or recent SARS-CoV-2 infection — irrespective of whether they are symptomatic or convalescent,” he said.
This means that “it is an almost certain immunological prognostication that if viral antigens are present in the tissues, any tissues, of subjects who undergo vaccination, the antigen-specific immune response triggered by the vaccine will target those tissues and cause inflammation and damage beyond the local anatomic site of vaccine placement,” Noorchashm warned.
He cautioned specifically in the case of frail and elderly people that the damage caused by the vaccine “is certain to cause blood clot formation with the potential for major thromboembolic complications.” Noorchashm also noted the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) own guidance regarding individuals known to be infected with SARS-CoV-2, instructing that their vaccination “should be deferred.” According to Noorchashm, this guidance arises from the medical understanding that “vaccinating the infected poses a risk of exacerbating illness by stimulating an inflammatory response in individuals who are infected.”
On account of the elderliness of the Benedictine sisters and their exposure to COVID-19, Noorchashm believes that some of the nuns may still be at risk of serious injury, even if they have recovered from the virus, by taking the second shot of the COVID vaccine in May: “It is my professional opinion that this could be an extremely harmful error for your community — especially given that some of you are over the age of 65 and may have other cardiovascular risk factors.”
PETITION UPDATE (5/12/2021) -
It seems that Dr. Anthony Fauci's role in the NIH's funding of so-called "gain-of-function" research may be catching up with him.
In the last couple of days, both U.S. Senator Rand Paul and Fox's Tucker Carlson have laid into Fauci for his alleged promotion of this dangerous research which develops bat-based coronaviruses into more potent variants, capable of infecting humans.
Dr. Fauci denied funding this research.
But, Senator Paul noted that a resident virologist at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Dr. Shi Zheng-li and Dr. Ralph Baric, an American virologist funded by Fauci's department in the NIH, "collaborated on gain-of-function research where they enhanced the SARS virus to infect human airway cells and they did it by merging a new spy protein on it. That is gain-of-function. That was joint research between the Wuhan Institute and Dr. Baric. You [Dr. Fauci] can’t deny it."
And, later, Fox News host Tucker Carlson picked up on the discrepancy, noting Fauci’s involvement in the creation and promotion of public health directives on account of COVID-19 while also being allegedly tied to the origin of the virus and its spread throughout the world.
So, the evidence - both in testimony and in the court of public opinion - continues to mount.
Could we ask you to consider SIGNING and SHARING this important petition, which calls for Dr. Fauci to be fired and investigated for any role he played in promoting and funding the dangerous research which may have cost the world dearly in lives and jobs lost.
When concerned scientists warned the US government of the great danger of creating superviruses in the lab, one man publicly defended the risky experiments: that man was the influential head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), none other than "Mr. Science" himself: Dr. Anthony Fauci.
In 2014, the same year the US government called for a moratorium on this insanely dangerous research, Dr. Fauci's NIAID began funding a program to study the transmission of bat coronaviruses to humans.
Not only did his funding go to develop the technology for making bat coronaviruses spread more easily to humans, but much of it went to the lab located in the exact location where the Covid pandemic eventually emerged: Wuhan, China.
Like every person, Dr. Fauci deserves to be presumed innocent until proven guilty.
But the evidence is so overwhelming that Fauci gambled with a supervirus and lost (the whole world lost), that, at a minimum, he needs to be fired from his position of public trust and must be investigated for possible violations of US law which mandated a moratorium on this extremely dangerous practice of creating superviruses in the lab.
However Dr. Fauci, far from being held responsible for his dangerous gamble, has been promoted to the point where, currently, he is the highest paid employee in the US Government.
Please SIGN and SHARE this petition if you agree that Dr. Anthony Fauci should instead be immediately fired and investigated for his role in causing the Covid-19 pandemic.
Just like the Wall Street moguls, whose financial negligence precipitated the financial crisis of 2008, received massive bailout bonuses, Dr. Anthony Fauci recklessly pushed for the research that probably caused the deadly pandemic. And now, he, too, has been rewarded with money and power.
As has been carefully and meticulously documented by Steve Hilton of Fox News, the probable origins of the coronavirus point to Dr. Anthony Fauci.
Dr. Fauci was one of the greatest proponents of developing superviruses in labs.
Dr. Fauci was responsible for the funding of much of the research through the NIAID.
And, it appears that Dr. Fauci funneled taxpayer funds through an intermediary to allow the research to continue in the unsafe Wuhan Institute of Virology, even after the US government banned the funding of this dangerous research.
Until a thorough investigation into his role of the origins of the current pandemic has taken place, Dr. Fauci should not be in a position of public trust.
Please SIGN and SHARE this petition to demand that Dr. Fauci be fired immediately and investigated fully for his role in the creation of Covid-19 and the ensuing pandemic.
P.S. It should be noted that Dr. Fauci not only has proven to be catastrophic for public health with his advocacy of dangerous research, but he has also been a disastrous public health advisor, advocating measures that have negatively impacted every aspect of our lives, from the economy to our most fundamental liberties.
P.P.S. Dr. Anthony Fauci, recently stated that he is delighted to be pushing Joe Biden's return to US taxpayer funding of abortions abroad. So, evidently, not only does Dr. Fauci have problems with public health, public safety, and economics, but also with basic human rights and embryology.
FOR MORE INFORMATION
**Photo Credit: Official White House Photo by Tia Dufour
Noorchashm recommends the sisters take further PCR tests to determine if any members of the community are still infected with COVID-19. He also recommends waiting between six and eight months after a positive test before taking any COVID vaccine, the reasons for which are twofold.
In the first place, Noorchashm advises that having the antibodies that would supposedly give rise to a positive PCR test suggest that a person is “almost certainly immune.” Second, “vaccinating persons with recent or current natural infections risks re-activating … a potentially deadly inflammatory response in their bodies.”
“(The) naturally infected are likely to be at risk of harm from indiscriminate COVID-19 vaccination,” he added.
Before signing off on his letter, Noorchashm expressed his wish for the good health and recovery of all the sisters of St. Walburg Monastery, invoking the name of Christ.
Despite Noorchashm’s recommended use of PCR testing to discover cases of COVID-19, recent research suggests that the method is not reliable in detecting COVID. At the end of last year, a group of 22 independent research scientists released an analysis thoroughly critcizing and debunking the Corman-Drosten paper (CD), a study that gave rise to the widespread use of PCR testing for COVID-19.
The consortium identified “numerous technical and scientific errors,” noting that neither the “test nor the manuscript itself fulfils the requirements for an acceptable scientific publication.” They dubbed the CD paper as “flawed science” and called its authors “intellectually dishonest.”
The scientists drew attention to the fact that the team that initially developed PCR testing had no access to COVID-19 and thus were unable to verify its application. On account of this, the group called the tests “useless” and “completely unsuitable” to sufficiently detect cases of COVID.