News
Featured Image
Martin Blachier, French public health specialistScreenshot/Twitter

PARIS, France (LifeSiteNews) – In 2020, the year COVID-19 made its appearance and triggered hitherto unseen curbs on public liberties in most parts of the world, only 2 percent of patient hospitalizations in France were attributable to the disease. And notwithstanding the hype about intolerable pressure on the French hospital system, only 5 percent of patients in critical care were COVID patients (and 11 percent of patients on life support). 

These figures were released on October 28 by an official agency linked to the French Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, the ATIH (Technical Agency for Information on Hospitalization), and were brought to the public’s attention by Martin Blachier, a data analyst and public health specialist with medical training. 

Blachier told a journalist of La chaîne parlementaire (LCP), the public television station of the French parliament, that the ATIH “manages all hospital data systems and knows about all hospitalizations that take place throughout the French territory as well as the reason for them.” 

“When you read this report, in the very first lines you find that during the year 2020 COVID patients represented 5 percent of all patients cared for in the intensive care units. You read on and learn that COVID patients represented 2 percent of all inpatients in the year 2020. When you see this ATIH report, you are a little surprised, you look up, and you say, ‘We are talking about this year 2020 where there were 2 lockdowns.’ It cost France 200 billion euro, and we know that 35 percent of young people have acknowledged that they had suicidal ideations because of these lockdowns, and I’m not even talking about learning delays and school phobias that haven’t even been quantified by formal studies,” he said. 

Over the last 18 months – and over 500 media appearances – Martin Blachier has wavered between alarmist predictions and reality checks. In recent weeks, he has slammed lockdown policies and, while promoting “vaccination” for the elderly, has also made very clear that he would never agree to force the COVID jabs on his own children. 

On the LCP show, Blachier went on to comment on the official report, noting that “in reality, it is a little more complex.” 

“It is true that these COVID hospitalizations are a little longer than standard hospitalizations, but if you take this factor into account, on the total number of hospitalization days, fewer than one [day] out of five [days] was related to COVID in the year 2020. And yes, you had more saturation during the few weeks of the peak of the waves, but in any case, over the whole year, these two percent of hospitalizations are very, very, very far away from the image we have of them: that is to say, that during the whole year 2020, hospital wards were full to the brim with COVID patients, and that the other patients could no longer go to hospital,” he said. 

Many critics of public COVID policies pounced on the numbers, noting that the scare tactics used by the government to impose restrictions, lockdowns, and now forced vaccination for health and care workers as well as the sanitary pass required of all citizens aged 12 and over are based on realities that are not nearly as concerning as they were made out to be. 

Mainstream media “fact-checked” the data and, although they could not deny the statistics published by a government agency, insisted that things had indeed been very bad during the peaks of the two COVID epidemics registered in France in the spring of 2020 and then in October and November, with up to 35,000 COVID patients in hospital simultaneously for a few weeks in April and November. 

They also stressed that COVID patients stayed up to 18 days on average in life support units, with 11 percent of patients representing 19 percent of hospitalization days. 

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Ban Critical Race Theory in public schools
  Show Petition Text
9764 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 10000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The dangerous ideas of Critical Race Theory (CRT) are being forced on students in public schools around the country.

This is wrong and parents have had enough! It's time to join them in saying "STOP!" to this harmful and racist propaganda.

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition which says "No to CRT" in public schools, and "Yes to parents' right" to strongly protest CRT.

But, what is CRT anyway and why is it so dangerous?

Critical Race Theory is a hateful system of indoctrination which teaches that one race is either superior or inferior to another race, and that the United States is inherently racist.

CRT is dangerous and hateful precisely because it teaches children who are not white to despise and envy white children simply because of their skin color. And, as a result, it also teaches white children to despise themselves simply because of the color of their skin.

CRT also erroneously teaches that American society is inherently racist, and that different, detrimental policies (like reparations for slavery and race-based pay scales) should be imposed on the population to redistribute wealth from whites to non-whites.

This type of racist/marxist propaganda should have NO place in public, taxpayer-funded schools!

And, thankfully, American parents of EVERY COLOR are raising their voices and ballots against it!

Indeed, parents understand the destructive ramifications of CRT and, despite outrageous threats from Biden's Justice Department to prosecute them, they have been strongly protesting CRT at school board meetings across the country!

And now, in the first test of its kind, a candidate who was campaigning hard against CRT just won the governorship of Virginia in a huge upset victory.

That's great news, but we now need to contact every state legislature about this crucial educational issue.

And, we need to DEMAND that they BAN Critical Race Theory from every public school in their states - both primary and high schools, and colleges!

Whereas advocates of CRT seem more intent on vengence than on teaching children of every race to respect everybody, regardless of skin color, American parents of every race understand that it is not the color of one's skin that matters, but the content of one's character (to paraphrase Martin Luther King, Jr.).

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition asking all state legislatures to BAN Crititical Race Theory from public schools in their respective states.

Thank you!

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

'States are fighting the Left over the morally bankrupt critical race theory' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/states-are-fighting-the-left-over-the-morally-bankrupt-critical-race-theory/

'Parents who oppose Critical Race Theory in schools could be prosecuted by FBI' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/attorney-general-tasks-fbi-to-move-against-parents-protesting-leftist-agenda-in-schools/

Ohio parents testify: Yes, critical race theory is in our schools, and we say NO! - https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/ohio-parents-testify-yes-critical-race-theory-is-in-our-schools-and-we-say-no

An excellent Heritage Foundation document on CRT: Critical Race Theory Would Not Solve Racial Inequality: It Would Deepen It

**Photo Credit: EJ Nickerson / Shutterstock.com

  Hide Petition Text

But they did not acknowledge that these stays were shorter during the first “wave,” when the worst-off patients died within a few days of hospitalization, having been ordered to stay at home until their systems were so bad that they could hardly breathe. This changed somewhat during the second “wave” (called a second epidemic by Dr. Didier Raoult because the virus had mutated considerably), with better care including, in some cases, antibiotics, corticosteroid therapy, and anticoagulant treatments for the hospitalized. This in itself led to longer stays, while less-ill patients were taken into hospitals for oxygen therapy (although this could have been administered at home, as Raoult also underscored in multiple interviews since the epidemic began). 

Nor did anyone mention that the French government and health authorities, like many of their counterparts the world over, refused and are still refusing early treatment including ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and other drugs, supplements, and vitamins that demonstrably prevent a considerable proportion of hospital admissions for COVID. 

Other data that remain difficult to ascertain are regarding the true reason for hospital admissions and deaths in relation with COVID. Many, if not all, people who tested positive were counted as COVID patients even if the main reason for their hospital stay or death was a serious illness they had as well. A number of deaths were even attributed to COVID when patients had COVID-like symptoms but were not tested for the virus. What is known is that hospitals got enhanced public subsidies for COVID hospitalizations, creating a financial incentive for mentioning COVID in their patient files. 

It is also interesting to note that France downsized its ICU capacity in public hospitals over 2020 and that, at the height of the crisis, offers from private clinics to take in COVID patients for intensive care were not followed up by the public hospital sector. In addition, since September 2021, thousands of health care workers, including doctors and nurses, refusing to take the experimental COVID “vaccine” have been dismissed without pay or any kind of social benefit, leading some emergency wards and other departments to close up to half of their beds or more. 

Other details about hospitalizations in France revealed by the ATIH report also show that the situation was less alarming than the incessant media propaganda made out. 

In his interview with LCP, Martin Blachier  said, “Another figure that is particularly interesting is that 2 percent of people over 80 years old who were hospitalized in 2020 were there for COVID reasons, and that a third of them unfortunately died, which adds up to 0.6 percent of the over-80s.”  

“What is interesting is that this report of the ATIH also focuses on heart failure – you know when you have had a heart attack or heart disease or even the heart starts to become a little weak: heart failure in those over 80 years old kills 15 percent of this age group every year,” he continued.  

“Other data that is extremely interesting is that they counted among the patients who were hospitalized for COVID the share of patients who had these famous ‘comorbidities,’ and compared it to influenza. In fact, what is quite interesting is that we see that COVID is more selective regarding comorbidities than influenza: it means that influenza has the ability to attack patients with comorbidities in a slightly more virulent way than COVID does.” 

Blachier concluded: “These data indicate two things: first, that the COVID phenomenon was particularly impactful because it was sudden and because it was essentially unknown and unprecedented, but we also realize that the idea it was COVID patients who filled the hospitals during these two years is a false idea; the true number is between 2 and 5 percent. We had a prism, a vision of the situation that was out of sync with the reality of the hospital. I’m sorry, but it’s true; just look at this report. And the other thing we see is that the fact that COVID mostly targets people with comorbidities means that when there is sufficient immunity in the population, COVID will most likely become a less severe disease than influenza.” 

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

2 Comments

    Loading...