Featured Image
The Iowa Judicial Branch building in Des Moines. The state Supreme Court, composed of a Chief Justice and six Associate Justices, is housed in the building.Shutterstock/Steve Kurkov

DES MOINES (LifeSiteNews) – The Iowa Supreme Court has ruled that there is no “right” to abortion in the state constitution, paving the way for new pro-life laws if Roe v. Wade is overturned.  

On June 17, with the U.S. Supreme Court considering whether to overturn Roe v. Wade, the Iowa Supreme Court declared that there is no “right to an abortion” in the Iowa Constitution. 

The Iowa Constitution is not the source of a fundamental right to an abortion necessitating a strict scrutiny standard of review for regulations affecting that right,” Justice Edward Mansfield wrote in the 182-page opinion. 

The Iowa Supreme Court opinion states that a Supreme Court ruling to overturn Roe v. Wadecould decide whether the undue burden test continues to govern federal constitutional analysis of abortion rights.” 

RELATED: South Dakota becomes abortion-free as Planned Parenthood closes state’s last facility

“We expect the opinions in that case will impart a great deal of wisdom we do not have today,” it continued. “Although we take pride in our independent interpretation of the Iowa Constitution, often our independent interpretations draw on and contain exhaustive discussions of both majority and dissenting opinions of the United States Supreme Court.” 

The ruling reverses a previous decision by the Iowa Supreme Court in 2018 holding that,Implicit in the concept of ordered liberty,” under the state’s Constitution, “is the ability to decide whether to continue or terminate a pregnancy,” according to the Ames Tribune. 

Lawmakers have also advanced a constitutional amendment in response to the 2018 decision, with Republican state Sen. Jake Chapman calling the decision an “egregious usurpation of power.” “Regrettably, five unelected judges with the stroke of a pen fabricated, fabricated a constitutional right to an abortion under Iowa’s constitution,” he said. 

The new ruling will allow more pro-life laws to be passed throughout the state if Roe v. Wade is overturned. 

— Article continues below Petition —
Tell Dave Rubin: Aborting disabled babies is cruel.
  Show Petition Text
6301 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 7500!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Dave Rubin (left) hosts one of the most popular conservative chat-shows on YouTube, but we now know his views are as extreme as many on the left.

Not only are Rubin and his homosexual partner using surrogate mothers to bear two babies, thus deliberately depriving the children of their true mothers' care once born, but he also admitted those babies would have been aborted if found to have severe disabilities. 

SIGN the petition telling Dave Rubin that true conservatives protect life and uphold the right of children to be raised by their mothers.

Mr. Rubin recently said he also supports abortion up until 12 weeks, compounding the regrettable pro-eugenics stance he has taken towards unborn babies with severe disabilities. 

There are few things more tragic in our world today than the disposable attitude of many people towards innocent human life, but that is exactly what Rubin thinks is acceptable.

This must be called out - it's simply abhorrent to treat the disabled, the unwanted, and the vulnerable with such callous disregard. 

Tell Dave Rubin that his pro-eugenics views have no place in a humane society.

Can you imagine finding out your parents would have aborted you if you had a severe disability? 

Well, that's unfortunately what will happen to the children Rubin raises if they someday read his latest book, "Don't Burn This Country".

There he shares that he and his family's decision would have been to "terminate the pregnancy" if a severe disability was found in one of the babies now being borne by their surrogate mothers. 

Rubin must understand how cruel this entire situation is, not only for the mothers and their children who will be taken away, but also for disabled people to know they are essentially thought of as "lives unworthy of life."

Real conservatives must speak up now and tell Rubin that his pro-abortion views are abhorrent.

Mr. Rubin's public split with the left is to be welcomed, but "conservative" leaders like him will do much more harm than good if they continue using their platform to undermine the family and the right of children to be born.

If we let these cornerstones of society be attacked from within, what hope have we of building a culture we can be proud to hand on?

Make a stand today for unborn children and their mothers - tell Dave Rubin that he's wrong.

True conservatives cannot afford to take the easy shortcut of ignoring Rubin's cruel position, lest we continue to be shunted further left, becoming radical liberals in everything but name.

So, please SIGN and SHARE this petition today,


Why are leading conservatives congratulating Dave Rubin and his 'husband'? - LifeSiteNews

Dave Rubin says he'd ask his surrogate to abort any disabled child - The Bridgehead

**Main Image: YouTube screenshot of Dave Rubin talking to Donald Trump Jr.**

  Hide Petition Text

Following the Supreme Court leak, new pro-life bills across America have emerged as legislators prepare for the potential overturning of the nearly 50-year-old abortion ruling. 

Last month, Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt signed a new heartbeat law banning all abortions after around six weeks of pregnancy and another bill banning nearly all abortions from conception in anticipation of the overturning of Roe v. Wade. 

Similarly, Many Republican-led states, including Idaho and Florida, have enacted pro-life legislation in anticipation of the Court’s ruling. 

Willey, a small town in Iowa, passed legislation banning all abortions and thereby making their city America’s 49th sanctuary city for the unborn.  


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.