Featured Image

OSAKA, Japan (LifeSiteNews) – A Japanese court has ruled that the country’s ban on homosexual “marriage” is not unconstitutional. 

A district court in Osaka ruled Monday that Japan’s ban of same-sex unions did not contradict the Japanese constitution. The ruling was the result of a lawsuit filed by three homosexual couples, two of men and one of women. The ruling contradicted a March 2021 ruling from a district court in Sapporo that found that the ban violated the right to free unions and equality. 

Judge Fumi Doi of Osaka ruled that marriage is a system established by society to protect relationships between men and women who bear and raise children, and that homosexual unions are still an object of debate in Japanese society. The court also rejected the plaintiffs’ desire for $7,400 in damages. However, the court opined that the Japanese parliament should look for ways to create legal protections for same-sex relationships and and legalize homosexual “marriage.”  

“From the perspective of individual dignity, it can be said that it is necessary to realize the benefits of same-sex couples being publicly recognized through official recognition,” the court stated. “Public debate on what kind of system is appropriate for this has not been thoroughly carried out.” 

RELATED: Texas GOP platform calls homosexuality an ‘abnormal lifestyle choice’

The Japanese constitution defines marriage as a system based on “the mutual consent of both sexes.” 

Reacting to the ruling, Machi Sakata, one of the plaintiffs, said “I actually wonder if the legal system in this country is really working … I think there’s the possibility this ruling may really corner us.” Sakata “married” her partner in the United States. The pair are expecting a baby in August, according to Reuters, which did not specify how they will obtain the child.

Akiyoshi Miwa, a lawyer working for the plaintiffs, said that the plaintiffs will file an appeal. Speaking to Reuters, Miwa said “We emphasize in this case that we wanted same-sex couples to have access to the same things as regular couples.” 

More than 200 municipalities in Japan have issued non-legally binding partnership certificates that allow homosexual partners to rent housing together and make hospital visits, both of which are currently forbidden under Japanese law. Japanese law also forbids homosexual couples from inheriting each other’s property and having parental rights over each other’s children. 

Last week, the Tokyo metropolitan government voted to issue partnership certificates to homosexual partners. The city will start issuing the certificates in October, though the certificates will offer no legal protections. A similar case to the one in Osaka is set to be decided in Tokyo later this year. Polling shows that 70% of Tokyo citizens are in favor of legalizing homosexual “marriage.” 

According to conservative commentator Douglas Murray, Japanese treat homosexuality with “indifference rather than hate,” as explained in his book The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race, and Identity. However, most Japanese say that they are in favor of legalizing homosexual unions, according to a poll taken last year by Asahi Shimbun. 

RELATED: US Secretary of State says he promotes LGBT agenda ‘in every conversation’ with Saudis

— Article continues below Petition —
Stand with the MLB players who refuse to wear Pride colors
  Show Petition Text
13460 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 15000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Five Tampa Bay Rays pitchers are now subject to a media witch-hunt after refusing to wear LGBT symbols on their hats and shirts because of their faith in God. 

One ESPN commentator called the men "bigoted" for supposedly using "religious exemption BS" to say "no" to the Pride Month clothing.

It's time to stand with these men against the intolerance of the radical left.

SIGN the petition to support the MLB players opposing LGBT Pride

The careers and lives of the five pitchers — Jason Adam, Jalen Beeks, Brooks Raley, Jeffrey Springs and Ryan Thompson — will be greatly harmed if we abandon them to the cancel culture of their critics, like ESPN's Sarah Spain.

“That religious exemption BS is used in sports and otherwise also allows for people to be denied health care, jobs, apartments, children, prescriptions, all sorts of rights,” Spain claimed. 

“We have to stop tiptoeing around it because we’re trying to protect people who are trying to be bigoted...” she continued.

These men should be celebrated for their bravery, but instead are being derided for sticking up for their Christian beliefs. 

SIGN the petition to stand with these five brave Christian players

People are being bullied into conformity by an LGBT movement that claims to be about tolerance and diversity, unless you're a devout Christian.

“Now they’re trying to cancel people for not wearing a gay pride patch,” the Daily Wire’s Matt Walsh remarked. 

“This is always the trajectory for the Left. First they demand tolerance, then acceptance, then celebration, then participation. Learn to say no to these people or it will never end.”

It's hard to imagine sports columnists like Nancy Armour of USA Today attacking Muslims for their rejection of Pride propaganda, but she sees no problem in attacking these devout Christians.

We hope Nancy Armour's reading of the New Testament extends to Romans 1:25-27.

Most commentators simply don't understand that loving everyone as a Christian means telling people certain actions are extremely harmful to the soul.

SIGN: These men were right to reject the LGBT Pride insignias on their hats and jerseys.

Indeed, by peeling off the rainbow logo from their jerseys and wearing the standard team hat, the five pitchers have taken a stand against an ideology that's antithetical to Christianity.

Major League Baseball (MLB) and every other professional sports league have promoted LGBTQ causes in recent years, including showcasing a “marriage” proposal between two homosexuals in front of a stadium packed with families.   

Sports are no longer safe from the tenticles of the LGBT movement, with players being strong-armed into virtue signaling for causes they disagree with.

It's time for people to stand up and say "Enough".

SIGN the petition and play your part in resisting the advances of intolerant wokeism into every sphere of public life.

Thank you for signing and sharing this petition.


ESPN commentator calls players "bigots" for refusing to wear Pride colors - LifeSiteNews

Five MLB players take a stand for God - LifeSiteNews

**Photo: The Tampa Bay Rays’ Jason Adam, Jalen Beeks, Brooks Raley, Jeffrey Springs and Ryan Thompson - Converseer/Twitter**


  Hide Petition Text

Prime Minister Fumio Kishida of the Liberal Democratic Party, discussing homosexual unions, said that the issue needs careful consideration before a decision is made. Senior members of his party have called for legalization, though the party itself has not voiced opinion. 

Activists have pushed for legalizing same-sex unions in Japan as a way to help the country to attract foreign businesses. Speaking to Reuters, Masa Yanagisawa, head of prime services at Goldman Sachs and a board member of Marriage for All Japan, an activist group, said that “International firms are reviewing their Asian strategy and LGBTQ inclusivity is becoming a topic.”  

“International businesses don’t want to invest in a location that isn’t LGBTQ friendly,” continued Yanagisawa. 

 Japan is the only G7 country that has yet to legalize same-sex unions.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.