Brad Mattes, Executive Director, Life Issues Institute

Justice Roberts will forever wear mantle of judicial activist Obamacare ruling

Brad Mattes, Executive Director, Life Issues Institute
By Brad Mattes Executive Director Life Issues Institute

July 4, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – I don’t have to tell you the US Supreme Court decision on Obamacare was a disaster. What makes it doubly tragic is that Chief Justice John Roberts, perceived as “one of our own,” threw every American under the bus, because we’ll all be impacted in some way by this federal legislation.

While writing the majority opinion, Roberts said that Congress could force Obamacare on the American people—complete with its mandatory participation in abortion, healthcare rationing and euthanasia. The mandate was declared constitutional with a legal sleight of hand—provided the price for disobeying the mandate is called a “tax” and not a “penalty”.

Some pundits complimented Roberts’ intellect, saying he was “playing chess” to ensure that the Supreme Court wasn’t viewed as being political under his leadership as chief justice. But the tragic reality is that while Roberts fiddles with the court’s image, Rome burns. During his “chess match” with the Obama administration, our religious rights and basic freedoms were discarded like yesterday’s trash.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in his opinion, “It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices.” At first glance, that has a ring of truth to it, but only until one considers that every law the US Supreme Court considers is the consequence of those the voters have elected. If Roberts is abdicating his court’s responsibility, why do we even need them?

All of this, Roberts claims, was done in the name of judicial restraint—that the Court only interpret the constitution, not legislate from the bench. But that becomes an impossible sell when in the Obamacare decision Roberts first said the mandate wasn’t a tax. This enabled Obamacare to get past the Anti-Injunction Act which would’ve required a citizen be actually taxed and claim damages before it could be brought before the Court. But paragraphs later, the Chief Justice did a complete about-face and declared the mandate could be considered a tax, making it within the powers of congress and thus constitutional.

Roberts’ judicial activism is especially egregious because from the very beginning Congress went out of its way to avoid calling it a tax so they could garner enough votes to pass it. A version of the bill calling it a tax was actually voted down. If Roberts’ judicial version of the bill would’ve been known earlier, Obamacare would have never seen the light of day.

The dissenting opinion, co-written by justices Alito, Scalia, Thomas and Kennedy, shows they know judicial activism when they see it. “To say that the Individual Mandate merely imposes a tax is not to interpret the statute, but to rewrite it. Judicial tax-writing is particularly troubling.”

The Court ruling has thrown us to the wolves of a vast government bureaucracy. This is a government entity that has at times demonstrated an outright hatred of Christianity, morality and the right to life.

An encouraging piece of this judicial disaster was that Justice Anthony Kennedy joined the dissenting opinion denouncing all of Obamacare as unconstitutional. Justice Kennedy’s stand against the legislation underscores what my colleague, Dr. Willke, has been saying about the chances of him siding with us against Roe v. Wade. This gives credibility to his theory.

President George W. Bush must be grieving the Court’s ruling more than anyone. One of his greatest legacies was his impact on the Supreme Court. That legacy is now in tatters—much like our constitution.

Just as Justice Harry Blackmun is notorious for Roe v. Wade, Chief Justice John Roberts will forever wear the mantle of Obamacare, going down in history for imposing anti-life bureaucratic mandates on our nation.

The redeeming news is that the end of this story has yet to be written. We can undo Obamacare if pro-life voters become educated on where every candidate stands on this legislation. This is not the time to sit out the election because a candidate on your ballot is “less than perfect.” This philosophy is partially responsible for the dire straight we’re in now.

If Americans stand in unison and say no to Obamacare and all of its embedded anti-life measures this November, newly elected officials can repeal this tragic behemoth. Electing candidates who will say no to Obamacare should be job one of all pro-life citizens.

It’s not too early to start. Tell everyone you know to support candidates who value innocent human life from fertilization to natural death, and who will walk the talk by repealing Obamacare.

This article has been re-published with permission from the Life Issues Institute.

FREE pro-life and pro-family news.

Stay up-to-date on the issues you care about the most. Subscribe today. 

Select Your Edition:


Share this article

Advertisement
Featured Image
Lisa Bourne

‘You can’t have’ marriage equality ‘without polygamy’

Lisa Bourne
By Lisa Bourne

July 3, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) – Motivated by the U.S. Supreme Court ruling legalizing homosexual “marriage,” a Montana polygamist has filed for a second marriage license, so he can be legally wed to two women at once.

"It's about marriage equality," said Nathan Collier, using homosexual advocates’ term to support marriage redefinition. "You can't have this without polygamy."

Collier, who has has appeared on the TLC reality show Sister Wives with his legal wife Victoria, and his second wife Christine, said he was inspired by the dissent in the Supreme Court decision.

The minority Supreme Court justices said in Friday’s ruling it would open the door to both polygamy and religious persecution.

“It is striking how much of the majority’s reasoning would apply with equal force to the claim of a fundamental right to plural marriage,” wrote Chief Justice John Roberts.

Collier and his wives applied for a second marriage license earlier this week at the Yellowstone County Courthouse in Billings, a report from the Salt Lake Tribune said.

Collier, who was excommunicated from the Mormon Church for polygamy, married Victoria in 2000 and had a religious wedding ceremony with Christine in 2007. The three have seven children between them and from previous relationships.

"My second wife Christine, who I'm not legally married to, she's put up with my crap for a lot of years. She deserves legitimacy," Collier said.

Yellowstone County officials initially denied the application before saying they would consult with the County Attorney and get him a final answer.

Click "like" if you want to defend true marriage.

Bigamy, the holding of multiple marriage licenses, is illegal all 50 states, but Collier plans to sue if his application is denied. Officials expect to have an answer for him next week.

While homosexual “marriage” supporters have long insisted legalization of same-sex unions would not lead to polygamy, pro-life and family advocates have warned all along it would be inevitable with the redefinition of marriage.

“The next court cases coming will push for polygamy, as Chief Justice John Roberts acknowledged in his dissent,” said Penny Nance, president of Concerned Women for America, after the Supreme Court ruling. “The chief justice said “the argument for polygamy is actually stronger than that for ‘gay marriage.’ It’s only a matter of time.”

In a piece from the Washington Times, LifeSiteNews Editor-in-Chief and the co-founder of Voice of the Family John-Henry Westen stated the move toward legal polygamy is “just the next step in unraveling how Americans view marriage.”

Advertisement
Featured Image
Christopher Halloran / Shutterstock.com
Ben Johnson Ben Johnson Follow Ben

, , ,

Chris Christie: Clerks must perform same-sex ‘marriages’ regardless of their religious beliefs

Ben Johnson Ben Johnson Follow Ben
By Ben Johnson

TRENTON, NJ, July 3, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) – Chris Christie is not known for nuance. This time, he has turned his fiery personality loose on county clerks and other officials who have religious objections to performing same-sex “marriages.”

In a tone usually reserved for busting teachers' unions, Christie told clerks who hold traditional values, “You took the job, and you took the oath.” He would offer no exemption for an individual whose conscience would not allow him to participate in a union the vast majority of the world's religions deem sinful.

“When you go back and re-read the oath it doesn’t give you an out. You have to do it,” he said.

He told a reporter that there “might” be “individual circumstances” that “merit some examination, but none that come immediately to mind for me.”

“I think for folks who are in the government world, they kind of have to do their job, whether you agree with the law or you don’t,” the pugnacious governor said.

Since the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to legalize homosexual “marriage” last Friday, elected officials have grappled with how to safeguard the rights of those who have deeply held religious beliefs that would not allow them to participate in such a ceremony.

Christie's response differs markedly from other GOP hopefuls' responses to the Supreme Court ruling. Mike Huckabee, for instance, has specifically said that clerks should have conscience rights. Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal signed an executive order granting such rights and ordered clerks to wait until a pending court case was fully adjudicated before any clerk issues a marriage license to a homosexual couple.

Christie gave up a legal appeal after a superior court judge struck down his state's voter-approved constitutional marriage protection amendment. New Jersey is the only state where such a low court overturned the will of the voters.

The decision to ignore conscience rights adds to the growing number of Christie's positions that give conservatives pause.

The natural locus of support for a Christie 2016 presidential run is the Republican's socially liberal donor class, for personal as well as political reasons. His wife works on Wall Street, and some of the GOP's high-dollar donors – including Paul Singer – have courted Christie for years.

However, this year Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, and to a lesser degree Scott Walker have eclipsed Christie as the preferred candidates of the boardroom donors – who sometimes prefer Democrats to Republicans.

Christie also used language during a speech before the Republican Jewish Coalition last year, which concerned some major GOP donors.

Christie is reportedly spending this weekend with Mitt Romney and his family at Romney's New Hampshire home. Romney declined to enter the 2016 race himself and may be able to open his donor list to Christie's struggling campaign.

Advertisement
Featured Image
Shutterstock.com
Ben Johnson Ben Johnson Follow Ben

After having a girl with Down syndrome, this couple adopted two more

Ben Johnson Ben Johnson Follow Ben
By Ben Johnson

LINO LAKE, MN, July 3, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) – For most people, having five biological children would have been enough. In fact, for many Americans, large families are treated as a scandal or a burden.

But one family made the decision, not just to have a large family, but to give a home to some of the most vulnerable children in the world: Girls born overseas with Down syndrome.

Lee and Karen Shervheim love all seven of their children, biological or otherwise. Undeterred by having twin boys – Daniel and Andrew, 18 – they had Sam four years later.

They now have three daughters who are all 11 years old. All three have Down syndrome.

And two of them are adopted.

About the time their eight-year-old son, David, was born, Lee and Karen decided to adopt a child with Down syndrome to be a companion to their daughter, Annie.

They made the further unexpected choice to adopt a child from Eastern Europe with the help of Reece's Rainbow, which helps parents adopt children with Down syndrome.

“Between my wife and I, we couldn’t get it out of our heads,” Lee told the Quad City Press. “So many children need families and we knew we could potentially do something about it.”

After originally deciding to adopt Katie, they spent six weeks in Kiev, visiting an orphanage in nearby Kharkov. While there, they decided they may have room in their heart, and their home, for another child.

When they saw a picture of Emie striking the same pose as their biological daughter in one of their photographs, they knew they would come home with two children.

Both girls were the same age as their Annie. She would not lack for companionship, as they worried.

Lee said after the Ukrainian government – finally – completed the paperwork, they returned to the United States, when the real challenges began.

“The unvarnished truth,” Lee told the Press, is that adopting the Russian-speaking special needs children “was really disruptive to our family. They came with so many issues that we had not anticipated.”

After teaching them sign language and appropriate behavior, they moved to Lino Lake, Minnesota and found a new support group in Eagle Brook Church. There they found personal assistance and spiritual solace.

Every year in the past seven years has been better and better, they say.

“I think my girls can do almost anything they want to do,” he said, “and that’s what I want to help them become.”

The family's devotion is fueled by their faith, and it informs the sense of humor Lee showed in a tweet during the 2014 midterm elections:

It takes a special person to believe in the potential of the “mentally retarded,” as they were once labeled. Today, 90 percent of all babies diagnosed with Down syndrome in the womb will be aborted. The percentage is higher in some countries. Some have even spoken of "a world without people with Down syndrome."

Their God, and their experience, tell them that every child has infinite worth and potential, Lee told local media, and he would encourage anyone to follow his footsteps and adopt a Down syndrome child – or two.

“The message is that it really doesn’t matter where you started or where you came from,” Lee said. “There are endless opportunities for everyone, whether they have disabilities or not. They deserve a shot.”

Advertisement

Customize your experience.

Login with Facebook