News
Featured Image
NEW YORK, NY - SEPTEMBER 17: Naomi Wolf attends "Pump" New York Screening at Museum of Modern Art on September 17, 2014 in New York CityPhoto by Robin Marchant/Getty Images

Help Amanda recover from her vax injuries: LifeFunder

This article has been updated to provide further clarity and context.

(LifeSiteNews) — Feminist writer Naomi Wolf has issued a stark warning about the intended or unintended effects of the experimental mRNA COVID-19 shots: According to Wolf, they’re causing a large-scale “baby die-off” which amounts to “genocide.”

A prominent personality who does not neatly belong to either the pro-life or pro-abortion camp, Wolf famously generated controversy when she admitted that abortion is “evil,” but a “necessary evil.” 

On the issue of COVID-19 lockdowns and jab mandates, however, Wolf has firmly taken the side of opposition.

In a May 29 Substack post, the third-wave feminist author and journalist  – who was suspended from Twitter last year after raising the alarm about menstrual cycle disruptions associated with the coronavirus injections – highlighted an analysis underway by a team of researchers who are actively combing through the 55,000 Pfizer documents disclosed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) after a court order. Previously, the FDA had asked for 75 years to fully release the crucial documents.

According to Wolf, the 3,000 “highly credentialled doctors, RNs, biostatisticians,” and “medical fraud investigators” affiliated with Steven Bannon’s War Room and the Daily Clout, a media company which Wolf co-founded, “are serving humanity by reading through these documents and explaining them in lay terms.”

After pointing out that, per the documents, Pfizer and the FDA knew that the COVID-19 jabs both failed to prevent infection and contributed to a bevy of adverse reactions (including a reported 1,223 deaths), Wolf zeroed in on the impact the injections appear to have had on pregnant and lactating mothers and their babies.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Stop Tedros' WHO Pandemic Treaty
  Show Petition Text
97280 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 100000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The WHO Pandemic Treaty looks set to be one of the biggest power-grabs in living memory, with unelected globalists seeking the power to declare pandemics, and then control your country's response. 

But it's not too late to do something about it. 

SIGN and SHARE this special petition telling Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus that the WHO will never usurp your nation's sovereignty.

The past two years have been rife with infringements on personal liberties and civil rights by national governments, but now the World Health Organization is seeking to appropriate those same abusive powers to itself at a global level. 

194 member states representing 99% of the world's population are expected to sign pandemic treaties with the WHO that would allow Tedros, or any future Director General, to dictate exactly how your nation would respond to a new disease outbreak which they consider a pandemic.

This attack on national sovereignty will come as no surprise to those who for years have listened to elites like Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates discussing their vision for the centralization of power into globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), the WHO and the rest of the United Nations. 

SIGN this petition against the WHO's Pandemic Treaty, before it's too late.

Ludicrously, 20 world leaders calling for the treaty, including Tedros, Boris Johnson and Emmanuel Macron, compared the post-Covid world to the post-WWII period, saying similar co-operation is now needed to "dispel the temptations of isolationism and nationalism, and to address the challenges that could only be achieved together in the spirit of solidarity and co-operation - namely peace, prosperity, health and security."

Australian PM Scott Morrison is the latest leader to express support for a “pandemic treaty”.

The stated intention of the WHO is to “kickstart a global process to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.”

The wheels are already in motion, with the Biden administration officially proposing the initial steps towards handing global pandemic control to the WHO. 

Biden's representatives have submitted amendments to the WHO's International Health Regulations (IHR), which would give the Director General the right to declare health emergencies in any nation, even when disputed by the country in question.

These amendments, which would be legally binding under international law, will be voted on by the World Health Assembly (the governing body of the WHO) at a special convention running from May 22-28 and set the stage for a fully-fledged pandemic treaty to be passed. 

SIGN and SHARE the petition telling the WHO that you won't accept any pandemic treaty

The ball has been rolling since the last World Health Assembly meeting in December, where the United States launched negotiations "on a new international health instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response," a U.S. statement read. 

"This momentous step represents our collective responsibility to work together to advance health security and to make the global health system stronger and more responsive. 

"We look forward to broad and deep negotiations using a whole-of-society and whole-of-government approach that will strengthen the international legal framework for public health/pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response and enable us to address issues of equity, accountability, and multisectoral collaboration evident in the COVID-19 pandemic. 

"We know it will take all of us working together across governments, private sector, philanthropy, academia, and civil society to make rapid progress towards a long-term solution for these complex problems," the U.S. statement added.

SIGN the petition today to show the WHO that you won't accept this attack on national sovereignty.

These are precarious times in which freedom and self-determination must be defended from those who would ride rough-shod over your civil rights. 

We do not want to go back to global lockdowns, vaccine mandates and propoganda.

Sign the petition - speak up now!

For More Information:

Biden hands over American sovereignty with proposed WHO treaty - LifeSiteNews

Pandemic Treaty is a backdoor to global governance - LifeSiteNews

Dr. Robert Malone on the WHO's power-grab - LifeSiteNews

**Photo: YouTube Screenshot**

  Hide Petition Text

‘Reproduction itself is targeted, intentionally or not, by the MRNA vaccines’

According to Wolf’s reading of the analysis, the FDA and Pfizer were aware that the mRNA, spike protein, and lipid nanoparticles contained in the experimental COVID injections “did not stay in the injection site in the deltoid,” instead traveling into the bloodstream – and, for women, the ovaries.

“[T]here can indeed be a happenstance genocide,” Wolf said. “Reproduction itself is targeted, intentionally or not, by the mRNA vaccines.”

“And if you know that reproduction is harmed, and babies and fetuses are harmed, and you know that this is at scale, which everyone at Pfizer and at the FDA who read these documents, knew —and if you do not stop — then does that not ultimately become a genocide?” she said.

Spontaneous abortion, neonatal death, intrauterine death following the shots

Though pregnant women were specifically excluded from Pfizer’s COVID jab clinical studies (leading to skepticism regarding the validity of claims that the drugs could be reliably safe and effective for pregnant mothers), Wolf pointed out that 270 women became pregnant during the study, as the documents themselves note. 

LifeSiteNews has reported on the pregnancy-related COVID jab data released by the FDA, noting that a staggering 238 of the 270 of the pregnant women did not report the outcomes of their pregnancies following reception of the jab.

Of the women who did report outcomes, however, 27 of them reportedly lost their babies via spontaneous abortion (23), premature birth with neonatal death (2), or spontaneous abortion with intrauterine death (2). 

It’s unclear whether the jabs directly or indirectly contributed to the losses, which could have had other, natural causes.

Suppressed lactation, inability to produce milk

In her Substack post, Wolf also spotlighted indications in the documents that “some vaccinated mothers had suppressed lactation, or could produce no milk at all,” when attempting to nurse their newborns. Others experienced discolored milk, with one vaccinated mother stating her breast milk was a blue-green.

A pre-print study cited by Wolf found “negligible amounts” of petroleum product (PEG) from the vaccines in the breast milk of vaccinated women, but acknowledged that larger studies would be required to fully understand the risk posed to breastfeeding infants.

“Since no babies died in the brief time frame of the tiny study, the study concluded that nursing babies suffered no real ill effects from vaccinated mothers,” Wolf said. “But the study did not follow these poor babies, with their acknowledged sleeplessness and their confirmed GI distress, to see if they actually ‘thrived’ — gained weight and developed normally.”

“On such faulty science were women assured that the vaccines were ‘safe and effective’ for them and their nursing babies,” she said.

The baby formula shortage and the push for genetically modified ‘BioMilq’

The same FDA that failed to flag potential harms to babies due to the mRNA shots was also behind the catastrophic shutdown of the Abbott baby formula plant in Michigan this spring, Wolf noted.

For Wolf, the baby formula shortage coinciding with apparent lactation issues among vaccinated moms caused her to turn her attention toward those who stand to profit from the crisis.

Prominent elites including Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg have recently “invested in a startup called ‘BioMilq’ — which produces lab grown breast milk from mammary cells,” Wolf pointed out. 

“Reports of this startup include this Frankenstein-like language as if this is normal,” she said, quoting a CNN piece which explained that ‘The BIOMILQ team creates its product from cells taken from human breast tissue and milk, donated by women in the local community, who get a Target giftcard in return.”

‘And now, the babies are dying’

Wolf went on in her May 29 write-up to state that studies from Canada, Scotland, and Israel indicate “that babies are dying disproportionately, during and after 2021, in highly vaccinated countries, and that newborns are dying disproportionately if they have vaccinated mothers versus unvaccinated mothers.”

Scottish authorities launched an investigation after noting an “abnormal spike” in deaths among newborn babies following the rollout of the shots, at a rate nearly double the baseline. It’s unclear how many of the babies’ mothers were fully vaccinated. 

Hebrew University of Jerusalem senior lecturer Josh Guetzkow reported that data from RamBam Hospital in Haifa, Israel, showed that the “odds of having a stillbirth, abortion or miscarriage are 1.36” higher for vaccinated women. According to Guetzkow, 34% more spontaneous abortions and stillbirths occurred among vaccinated women compared with their unvaccinated peers.

Meanwhile in Canada, Dr. Daniel Nagase, an Alberta doctor who was ordered to leave his hospital for treating three COVID patients (all of whom who went home from hospital alive) with ivermectin, told a reporter that he had been informed of 86 stillbirths in Waterloo, Ontario between January and July of 2021.

“Normally, it’s only five or six stillbirths every year. So, about one stillbirth every two months is the usual rate,” he said. “So, to suddenly get to 86 stillbirths in six months, that’s highly unusual. But, the most important confirmation that we have from the Waterloo, Ontario report was that all of the [mothers of the] 86 stillbirths were fully vaccinated.

Nagase’s allegation has been challenged by fact-checkers and hospital authorities, who state that just 12 stillbirths occurred in the last fiscal year. Significantly, however, the previous fiscal year ran from April to August, a different timeframe than that mentioned by Nagase.

‘What do we do with all of this?’

 Wolf is not alone in warning that the COVID jabs could have severe impacts for pregnant women and their babies.

During a “Stop the Shot” conference streamed last year by LifeSiteNews, maternal-fetal medicine specialist Dr. Richard Blumrick explained that the mRNA-developed jabs may be able to cross the placental barrier, putting vaccine recipients at risk of fertility complications.

Likewise, commenting on the effects of the experimental jabs, Dr. Roger Hodkinson, CEO of Western Medical Assessments, argued that continuing to roll out the shots for pregnant women is “stark raving mad.”

“I’m blisteringly annoyed about the risks that we are subjecting pregnant women to, and younger women who might wish to become pregnant in the future, and their husbands,” he said.

For Wolf, the evidence uncovered in the Pfizer documents by the War Room and Daily Clout team has caused her to believe that Pfizer, the FDA, and members of the World Economic Forum (WEF) “are targeting the miraculous female body, with its ability to conceive, gestate, birth and nurture life.”

“They are targeting the human fetus’ very environment, one of the most sacred spaces on this earth, if not the most sacred,” she said. “And they know it.”

There have been 4,668 miscarriages and 133 stillbirths reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) through May 20, 2022. Reports include thousands of miscarriages and early pregnancy losses shortly after reception of the mRNA COVID jabs; babies that abruptly stop growing, or experience a stroke in utero; malformed babies; a baby dying from an inflamed placenta; and a baby born fatally bleeding from its mouth, nose, and lungs

Help Amanda recover from her vax injuries: LifeFunder

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

14 Comments

    Loading...