Featured Image

Help Canadian Dad who was fired for refusing vax: LifeFunder

OTTAWA (LifeSiteNews) – Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) MP and leadership candidate Leslyn Lewis insisted the Canadian government “defend our healthcare sovereignty” and vote against proposed U.S. amendments to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Health Regulations (IHR).

“Canadians are concerned about the vote this week and are counting on you as their representative to defend our healthcare sovereignty and take steps to ensure that the declaration of pandemics and management thereof, are not ceded to the unelected, unaccountable World Health Organization,” said Lewis in a press release Monday addressed to Canada’s Minister of Health Jean-Yves Duclos.

Lewis wrote that on behalf of “tens of thousands of concerned Canadians,” she is “respectfully asking” Duclos to “vote against all 13 amendments to the IHR proposed by the Working group.”

Duclos should “launch public consultations with Canadians to receive their views on whether you should engage in the broader Pandemic Treaty process,” said Lewis.

“Call the long-awaited public inquiry into your government’s handling of COVID-19. So we can all learn from mistakes that were made in the management of the COVID-19 and create our own pandemic response policy,” she added.

READ: DeSantis rips World Health Organization power grab, says ‘no way’ Florida would support it

Lewis noted that “Canadians are concerned about the vote this week and are counting on you as their representative to defend our healthcare sovereignty and take steps to ensure that the declaration of pandemics and management thereof, are not ceded to the unelected, unaccountable World Health Organization.”

She added that the “immediate concern” are proposed amendments to the WHO’s IHR stemming from U.S President Joe Biden’s regime. In January, the Biden administration quietly submitted to the IHR 13 proposed amendments to IHR articles for the health assembly to consider. The amendments were made public in April.

There are fears that the 13 amendments submitted to the IHR from the Biden administration and which Lewis noted are of concern, will strip signatory nations of their medical sovereignty.

In particular, the proposed amendments could allow WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, or any future Director-General, unchecked powers to declare a “health emergency” at any time.

“With the Pandemic Treaty still in the pre-drafting phase, Canadians are concerned that if the 13 amendments outlined in the April 2022 WHO Working Group for Pandemic Response document are passed, it largely lays the foundation for the future drafting and passing of the WHO Global Pandemic Treaty,” wrote Lewis.

“Most of the pandemic management responsibility powers would have been granted to the WHO under this amendment,” Lewis added.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Stop Tedros' WHO Pandemic Treaty
  Show Petition Text
101114 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 125000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The WHO Pandemic Treaty looks set to be one of the biggest power-grabs in living memory, with unelected globalists seeking the power to declare pandemics, and then control your country's response. 

But it's not too late to do something about it. 

SIGN and SHARE this special petition telling Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus that the WHO will never usurp your nation's sovereignty.

The past two years have been rife with infringements on personal liberties and civil rights by national governments, but now the World Health Organization is seeking to appropriate those same abusive powers to itself at a global level. 

194 member states representing 99% of the world's population are expected to sign pandemic treaties with the WHO that would allow Tedros, or any future Director General, to dictate exactly how your nation would respond to a new disease outbreak which they consider a pandemic.

This attack on national sovereignty will come as no surprise to those who for years have listened to elites like Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates discussing their vision for the centralization of power into globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), the WHO and the rest of the United Nations. 

SIGN this petition against the WHO's Pandemic Treaty, before it's too late.

Ludicrously, 20 world leaders calling for the treaty, including Tedros, Boris Johnson and Emmanuel Macron, compared the post-Covid world to the post-WWII period, saying similar co-operation is now needed to "dispel the temptations of isolationism and nationalism, and to address the challenges that could only be achieved together in the spirit of solidarity and co-operation - namely peace, prosperity, health and security."

Australian PM Scott Morrison is the latest leader to express support for a “pandemic treaty”.

The stated intention of the WHO is to “kickstart a global process to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.”

The wheels are already in motion, with the Biden administration officially proposing the initial steps towards handing global pandemic control to the WHO. 

Biden's representatives have submitted amendments to the WHO's International Health Regulations (IHR), which would give the Director General the right to declare health emergencies in any nation, even when disputed by the country in question.

These amendments, which would be legally binding under international law, will be voted on by the World Health Assembly (the governing body of the WHO) at a special convention running from May 22-28 and set the stage for a fully-fledged pandemic treaty to be passed. 

SIGN and SHARE the petition telling the WHO that you won't accept any pandemic treaty

The ball has been rolling since the last World Health Assembly meeting in December, where the United States launched negotiations "on a new international health instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response," a U.S. statement read. 

"This momentous step represents our collective responsibility to work together to advance health security and to make the global health system stronger and more responsive. 

"We look forward to broad and deep negotiations using a whole-of-society and whole-of-government approach that will strengthen the international legal framework for public health/pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response and enable us to address issues of equity, accountability, and multisectoral collaboration evident in the COVID-19 pandemic. 

"We know it will take all of us working together across governments, private sector, philanthropy, academia, and civil society to make rapid progress towards a long-term solution for these complex problems," the U.S. statement added.

SIGN the petition today to show the WHO that you won't accept this attack on national sovereignty.

These are precarious times in which freedom and self-determination must be defended from those who would ride rough-shod over your civil rights. 

We do not want to go back to global lockdowns, vaccine mandates and propoganda.

Sign the petition - speak up now!

For More Information:

Biden hands over American sovereignty with proposed WHO treaty - LifeSiteNews

Pandemic Treaty is a backdoor to global governance - LifeSiteNews

Dr. Robert Malone on the WHO's power-grab - LifeSiteNews

**Photo: YouTube Screenshot**

  Hide Petition Text

Lewis noted that “Canadians feel very passionately about our healthcare system” and want to know that their federal government and elected officials at all levels are “entrusted to act in their best interest, and are accountable to them.”

“There is growing concern about unelected officials within international organizations making healthcare decisions on their behalf during a pandemic,” noted Lewis.

I pray you make the wise decision, and protect Canada’s healthcare sovereignty.

The WHO’s IHR provides an “overarching legal framework that defines countries’ rights and obligations in handling  public health events and emergencies that have the potential to cross borders.”

“The IHR are an instrument of international law that is legally-binding on 196 countries, including the 194 WHO Member States,” notes the WHO.

READ: We must reject the World Health Organization’s ‘science’ based power grab

The WHO temporarily withdrew 12 of the 13 Biden amendments to the IHR after some nations voiced concerns about the proposed changes, meaning sufficient votes to pass the amendments were lacking. However, these amendments could resurface at any time, including at future meetings next month.

Lewis recently launched a petition demanding the Canadian federal government not give away its medical “sovereignty” by being involved with WHO’s pandemic treaty. It now has over 23,000 signatures.

Lewis remains the only pro-life candidate in the CPC leadership race, with Campaign Life Coalition (CLC) giving her a “green light” rating as a “supportable” pro-life candidate for her strong voting record in favor of life. The CPC will elect a new leader on September 10.

WHO meeting this week to discuss its ‘pandemic treaty’ 

The WHO is currently holding its “Seventy-fifth World Health Assembly” in Geneva, Switzerland, which is its “first in-person Health Assembly since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.” This event goes until May 28.

The World Health Assembly is the “decision-making body of WHO,” which this week at its 75th assembly event.

At the event, the assembly will hold “a series of strategic roundtables” with world government health officials to strengthen “WHO preparedness for and response to health emergencies” and work towards an “implementation road map 2023–2030 for the global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases.”

The International Treaty on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response, or what is known as the WHO Pandemic Treaty, is due to be signed in May 2024 by many governments around the world. Amendments to the IHR would most likely affect how the WHO’s pandemic treaty would be worded.

The treaty is still in draft form but will be discussed in length at the 75th assembly event.

Lewis warned the treaty includes “190 countries and would be legally binding.”

“It defines and classifies what is considered a pandemic and would give the WHO legal power over Canada’s pandemic response, including the ability to force lockdowns and dictate which drugs or vaccines can be used,” she said.

Government officials from around the world along with the WHO will be meeting this month to discuss the treaty in greater detail.

The group will meet again on August 1 to draft the exact wording of the treaty, which will legally bind signatory nations under international law to follow the convention’s articles.

According to the WHO, it will hold public hearings to “inform its deliberations,” before delivering a progress report to the WHA in 2023 and submit the outcome of the deliberations to the WHA in 2024.

Article 19 of the WHO Constitution leaves the “World Health Assembly with the authority to adopt conventions or agreements on any matter within WHO’s competence.”

The WHO’s pandemic treaty flew under the radar for months but has risen to social media prominence in recent weeks.

Recently, German Member of European Parliament (MEP) Christine Anderson warned that the WHO pandemic treaty would bring the “the abolition of democracy by the global elites.”

No doubt due to the current global hysteria and media hype surrounding monkeypox, the WHO’s pandemic treaty has received more scrutiny, from both those for and against it, in recent days.

In November 2021, Canada Health Minister Jean-Yves Duclos said that the government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau supports the creation of a WHO pandemic treaty.

Help Canadian Dad who was fired for refusing vax: LifeFunder


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.